From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB682A5E for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 12:13:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id f82so56992568wmf.1 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 03:13:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z4Ct6C+AhJi3r4XgK4zQEWyBDXjt/i2HDY4MyRM+wDg=; b=NC8HwTtiVxuiEg85bwfflxzmwG2D+l+Gq+fFuLGW5YuL01yWfzhekDxbxXyip0re9o DNJe4VzZy6jafFmeOa0FaLofNb1Km9TRkUcUZTqWDzUbHxdVzuR6vb3SiyVjEhM3kU1z A5hvhXw9IQtOdXqlQEqaOg9lWqwkL4ix/N0xRIpOm/PqHTz3GC6kG1GwvBEbMtj1Qlj2 NVCb/X28PHe6WyxLP4OmtyZd16jUUSHAuqL10rAdgEmvMXSGbQjrcPrq+qniwyZNcM3g mJFAK7UkkG4DrJKgFUQxnmtmk2KaH2k/fAud3+B8tqWTtdD5ZugcCE2zgnh2TWRvCei4 wz6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z4Ct6C+AhJi3r4XgK4zQEWyBDXjt/i2HDY4MyRM+wDg=; b=RZMgDIg/8Z+EcHOzEM7oX8rmwqajXZKmjuW3k28UVAjGFkBgqLd7IE3PN/rxyVsgcY 9T77siHo6eYR+iDGbpGLcNyqcOH5UJvK9yDbl2k96dvZfva0E8QhQzBtyWdqbZZjd6B7 iSfUhXCAMd99WC0zfUJonMtsAGhSfXk3AFG6Uih/72o5WXH71PQJbmYY6II/J/j9HvQT d9SMsjZgLlm+hgAeU4sQORS9R/JEsPVtFnb/MbOFcLUr6LqW2+KhFLawzBURXNCx6V+K GxmG4CgpKlFuT4tCO0F50EHP93FzLZTZ1s5bB36vNuq0sQG9xlpHPelq6V1/xZex37Zf 9t+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00s4F7w29Kv1PwTpk02MaRfif7HFVq80FZTgsI0v87iOluxF+Nd1wDxNkr5X42xgM11 X-Received: by 10.28.137.193 with SMTP id l184mr1697520wmd.88.1479986007649; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 03:13:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from 2a01cb0c08e311000226b0fffeed02fc.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr (2a01cb0c08e311000226b0fffeed02fc.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr. [2a01:cb0c:8e3:1100:226:b0ff:feed:2fc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c133sm7683197wme.12.2016.11.24.03.13.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Nov 2016 03:13:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1479986003.31853.4.camel@6wind.com> From: Olivier Matz To: Ferruh Yigit , dev@dpdk.org Cc: thomas.monjalon@6wind.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, helin.zhang@intel.com Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 12:13:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1479981261-19512-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <1479981261-19512-2-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.2-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/9] ethdev: clarify api comments of rx queue count X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 11:13:28 -0000 On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 10:52 +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 11/24/2016 9:54 AM, Olivier Matz wrote: > > The API comments are not consistent between each other. > > > > The function rte_eth_rx_queue_count() returns the number of used > > descriptors on a receive queue. > > > > PR=52423 > > What is this marker? > Sorry, this is a mistake, it's an internal marker... I hoped nobody would notice it ;) > > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz > > Acked-by: Ivan Boule > > Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit > Thanks for reviewing! Regards, Olivier