From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <john.mcnamara@intel.com> Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281E758DB for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 17:44:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2016 08:44:14 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,287,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="1093738928" Received: from sivswdev02.ir.intel.com (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([10.237.217.46]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2016 08:44:13 -0800 From: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com> To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 16:44:12 +0000 Message-Id: <1480697052-21951-1-git-send-email-john.mcnamara@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.0.7 Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc: add details of sub-trees and maintainers X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 16:44:16 -0000 Add a new section to the Code Contributors Guide to outline the roles of tree and component maintainers and how they can be added and removed. Signed-off-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com> --- doc/guides/contributing/patches.rst | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/patches.rst b/doc/guides/contributing/patches.rst index fabddbe..3b5746b 100644 --- a/doc/guides/contributing/patches.rst +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/patches.rst @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ The rationale for many of the DPDK guidelines is explained in greater detail in The DPDK Development Process ------------------------------ +---------------------------- The DPDK development process has the following features: @@ -21,13 +21,9 @@ The DPDK development process has the following features: * There are maintainers for hierarchical components. * Patches are reviewed publicly on the mailing list. * Successfully reviewed patches are merged to the repository. - -| - -* There are main repository ``dpdk`` and sub-repositories ``dpdk-next-*``. -* A patch should be sent for its target repository. Like net drivers should be on top of dpdk-next-net repository. -* All sub-repositories are merged into main repository for -rc1 and -rc2 versions of the release. -* After -rc2 release all patches should target main repository. +* Patches should be sent to the target repository or sub-tree, see below. +* All sub-repositories are merged into main repository for ``-rc1`` and ``-rc2`` versions of the release. +* After the ``-rc2`` release all patches should target the main repository. The mailing list for DPDK development is `dev@dpdk.org <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>`_. Contributors will need to `register for the mailing list <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>`_ in order to submit patches. @@ -37,6 +33,60 @@ The development process requires some familiarity with the ``git`` version contr Refer to the `Pro Git Book <http://www.git-scm.com/book/>`_ for further information. +Maintainers and Sub-trees +------------------------- + +The DPDK maintenance hierarchy is divided into a main repository ``dpdk`` and sub-repositories ``dpdk-next-*``. + +There are maintainers for the trees and for components within the tree. + +Trees and maintainers are listed in the ``MAINTAINERS`` file. For example:: + + Crypto Drivers + -------------- + M: Some Name <some.name@email.com> + T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-crypto + + Intel AES-NI GCM PMD + M: Another Name <another.name@email.com> + F: drivers/crypto/aesni_gcm/ + F: doc/guides/cryptodevs/aesni_gcm.rst + +Where: + +* ``M`` is a tree or component maintainer. +* ``T`` is a repository tree. +* ``F`` is a maintained file or directory. + +Additional details are given in the ``MAINTAINERS`` file. + +The role of the component maintainers is to: + +* Review patches for the component or delegate the review. + This should be done, ideally, within 1-2 weeks of submission to the mailing list. +* Add an ``acked-by`` to patches, or patchsets, that they agree are ready for committing to a tree. + +Component maintainers can be added or removed by submitting a patch to the ``MAINTAINERS`` file. +Maintainers should have demonstrated a reasonable level of contributions to the component area or to a similar area. +This should be confirmed by an ``ack`` from an established contributor. +There can be more than one component maintainer if desired. + +The role of the tree maintainers is to: + +* Maintain the overall quality of their tree. + This can entail additional review, compilation checks or other tests deemed necessary by the maintainer. +* Commit reviewed patches. +* Prepare the tree for integration. + +Tree maintainers can be added or removed by submitting a patch to the ``MAINTAINERS`` file. +The proposer should justify the need for a new sub-tree and should have demonstrated a sufficient level of contributions in the area or to a similar area. +This should be confirmed by 3 ``acks`` from established contributors. +Disagreements on trees or maintainers can be brought to the Technical Steering Committee. + +Tree backup maintainers, when required, can be selected from the active tree maintainers. +This can be agreed and coordinated by the tree maintainers. + + Getting the Source Code ----------------------- -- 2.7.4