From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699843B5 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 15:57:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D915A68BF for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 14:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25-97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-117-179.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.117.179]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v0REvAmI010562 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:57:12 -0500 From: Aaron Conole To: dev@dpdk.org Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:56:39 -0500 Message-Id: <1485529023-5486-2-git-send-email-aconole@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1485529023-5486-1-git-send-email-aconole@redhat.com> References: <1485529023-5486-1-git-send-email-aconole@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Fri, 27 Jan 2017 14:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/25] eal: CPU init will no longer panic X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 14:57:12 -0000 After this change, the EAL CPU NUMA node resolution step can no longer emit an rte_panic. This aligns with the code in rte_eal_init, which expects failures to return an error code. Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole --- lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_lcore.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_lcore.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_lcore.c index 2cd4132..84fa0cb 100644 --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_lcore.c +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_lcore.c @@ -83,16 +83,17 @@ rte_eal_cpu_init(void) config->lcore_role[lcore_id] = ROLE_RTE; lcore_config[lcore_id].core_id = eal_cpu_core_id(lcore_id); lcore_config[lcore_id].socket_id = eal_cpu_socket_id(lcore_id); - if (lcore_config[lcore_id].socket_id >= RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES) + if (lcore_config[lcore_id].socket_id >= RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES) { #ifdef RTE_EAL_ALLOW_INV_SOCKET_ID lcore_config[lcore_id].socket_id = 0; #else - rte_panic("Socket ID (%u) is greater than " + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Socket ID (%u) is greater than " "RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES (%d)\n", lcore_config[lcore_id].socket_id, RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES); + return -1; #endif - + } RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "Detected lcore %u as " "core %u on socket %u\n", lcore_id, lcore_config[lcore_id].core_id, -- 2.7.4