DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] lpm: add strict if control etc. on version 1.2.3
@ 2015-10-23  7:38 mablexidana
  2015-11-01 18:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: mablexidana @ 2015-10-23  7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

hi:
This is test on dpdk version 1.2.3.         
Fixes: 2a2174801fa4 ("    fix lpm bugs     add strict if control,do not let tbl24 process run into tbl8 process     add valid_group = valid, incase ,the valid_group is write to invalid")


add strict if control,do not let tbl24 process run into tbl8 process
add valid_group = valid, incase ,the valid_group is write to invalid


Regards


yuerxin


---
 lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)


diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
index bb1ec48..8fabf30 100644
--- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
+++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
@@ -423,33 +423,35 @@ add_depth_small(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip, uint8_t depth,


 continue;
 }
-
-/* If tbl24 entry is valid and extended calculate the index
- * into tbl8. */
-tbl8_index = lpm->tbl24[tbl24_index].tbl8_gindex *
-RTE_LPM_TBL8_GROUP_NUM_ENTRIES;
-tbl8_group_end = tbl8_index + RTE_LPM_TBL8_GROUP_NUM_ENTRIES;
-
-for (j = tbl8_index; j < tbl8_group_end; j++) {
-if (!lpm->tbl8[j].valid ||
-lpm->tbl8[j].depth <= depth) {
-struct rte_lpm_tbl8_entry new_tbl8_entry = {
-.valid = VALID,
-.valid_group = VALID,
-.depth = depth,
-.next_hop = next_hop,
-};
-
-/*
- * Setting tbl8 entry in one go to avoid race
- * conditions
- */
-lpm->tbl8[j] = new_tbl8_entry;
-
-continue;
-}
-}
-}
+        if (lpm->tbl24[i].ext_entry == 1) {
+
+            /* If tbl24 entry is valid and extended calculate the index
+             * into tbl8. */
+            tbl8_index = lpm->tbl24[i].tbl8_gindex *
+                RTE_LPM_TBL8_GROUP_NUM_ENTRIES;
+            tbl8_group_end = tbl8_index + RTE_LPM_TBL8_GROUP_NUM_ENTRIES;
+
+            for (j = tbl8_index; j < tbl8_group_end; j++) {
+                if (!lpm->tbl8[j].valid ||
+                    lpm->tbl8[j].depth <= depth) {
+                    struct rte_lpm_tbl8_entry new_tbl8_entry = {
+                        .valid = VALID,
+                        .valid_group = VALID,
+                        .depth = depth,
+                        .next_hop = next_hop,
+                    };
+
+                    /*
+                     * Setting tbl8 entry in one go to avoid race
+                     * conditions
+                     */
+                    lpm->tbl8[j] = new_tbl8_entry;
+
+                    continue;
+                }
+            }
+        }
+    }


 return 0;
 }
@@ -569,6 +571,7 @@ add_depth_big(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip_masked, uint8_t depth,
 .valid = VALID,
 .depth = depth,
 .next_hop = next_hop,
+          .valid_group = lpm->tbl8[i].valid_group,      //save for old groups g_valid flags
 };


 /*
@@ -634,7 +637,7 @@ rte_lpm_add(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip, uint8_t depth,
 }


 static inline int32_t
-find_previous_rule(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip, uint8_t depth)
+find_previous_rule(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip, uint8_t depth, uint8_t *sub_rule_depth)
 {
 int32_t rule_index;
 uint32_t ip_masked;
@@ -645,8 +648,10 @@ find_previous_rule(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip, uint8_t depth)


 rule_index = rule_find(lpm, ip_masked, prev_depth);


-if (rule_index >= 0)
+if (rule_index >= 0) {
+            *sub_rule_depth = prev_depth;
 return rule_index;
+        }
 }


 return -1;
@@ -654,7 +659,7 @@ find_previous_rule(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip, uint8_t depth)


 static inline int32_t
 delete_depth_small(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip_masked,
-uint8_t depth, int32_t sub_rule_index)
+uint8_t depth, int32_t sub_rule_index, uint8_t sub_rule_depth)
 {
 uint32_t tbl24_range, tbl24_index, tbl8_group_index, tbl8_index, i, j;
 uint8_t new_depth;
@@ -677,7 +682,7 @@ delete_depth_small(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip_masked,
 lpm->tbl24[i].depth <= depth ) {
 lpm->tbl24[i].valid = INVALID;
 }
-else {
+else if (lpm->tbl24[i].ext_entry == 1) {
 /*
  * If TBL24 entry is extended, then there has
  * to be a rule with depth >= 25 in the
@@ -703,19 +708,21 @@ delete_depth_small(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip_masked,
  */


 /* Calculate depth of sub_rule. */
+
 new_depth = (uint8_t) (sub_rule_index /
 lpm->max_rules_per_depth);


 struct rte_lpm_tbl24_entry new_tbl24_entry = {
 .valid = VALID,
 .ext_entry = 0,
-.depth = new_depth,
+            .depth = sub_rule_depth,
 {.next_hop = lpm->rules_tbl[sub_rule_index].next_hop,}
 };


 struct rte_lpm_tbl8_entry new_tbl8_entry = {
 .valid = VALID,
-.depth = new_depth,
+            .valid_group = VALID,
+.depth = sub_rule_depth,
 .next_hop = lpm->rules_tbl
 [sub_rule_index].next_hop,
 };
@@ -726,7 +733,7 @@ delete_depth_small(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip_masked,
 lpm->tbl24[i].depth <= depth ) {
 lpm->tbl24[i] = new_tbl24_entry;
 }
-else {
+else if (lpm->tbl24[i].ext_entry == 1){
 /*
  * If TBL24 entry is extended, then there has
  * to be a rule with depth >= 25 in the
@@ -807,7 +814,7 @@ tbl8_recycle_check(struct rte_lpm_tbl8_entry *tbl8, uint32_t tbl8_group_start)


 static inline int32_t
 delete_depth_big(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip_masked,
-uint8_t depth, int32_t sub_rule_index)
+uint8_t depth, int32_t sub_rule_index, uint8_t sub_rule_depth)
 {
 uint32_t tbl24_index, tbl8_group_index, tbl8_group_start, tbl8_index,
 tbl8_range, i;
@@ -843,7 +850,8 @@ delete_depth_big(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip_masked,
 /* Set new tbl8 entry. */
 struct rte_lpm_tbl8_entry new_tbl8_entry = {
 .valid = VALID,
-.depth = new_depth,
+.valid_group = lpm->tbl8[tbl8_group_start].valid_group,
+.depth = sub_rule_depth,
 .next_hop = lpm->rules_tbl[sub_rule_index].next_hop,
 };


@@ -900,6 +908,7 @@ rte_lpm_delete(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip, uint8_t depth)
 {
 int32_t rule_to_delete_index, sub_rule_index;
 uint32_t ip_masked;
+    uint8_t sub_rule_depth;
 /*
  * Check input arguments. Note: IP must be a positive integer of 32
  * bits in length therefore it need not be checked.
@@ -931,7 +940,8 @@ rte_lpm_delete(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip, uint8_t depth)
  * replace the rule_to_delete we return -1 and invalidate the table
  * entries associated with this rule.
  */
-sub_rule_index = find_previous_rule(lpm, ip, depth);
+    sub_rule_depth = 0;
+sub_rule_index = find_previous_rule(lpm, ip, depth,&sub_rule_depth);


 /*
  * If the input depth value is less than 25 use function
@@ -939,10 +949,11 @@ rte_lpm_delete(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip, uint8_t depth)
  */
 if (depth <= MAX_DEPTH_TBL24) {
 return delete_depth_small(lpm, ip_masked, depth,
-sub_rule_index);
+sub_rule_index, sub_rule_depth);
 }
 else { /* If depth > MAX_DEPTH_TBL24 */
-return delete_depth_big(lpm, ip_masked, depth, sub_rule_index);
+return delete_depth_big(lpm, ip_masked, depth, sub_rule_index,
+                                sub_rule_depth);
 }
 }


--
1.8.5.2 (Apple Git-48)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-11-01 18:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-23  7:38 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] lpm: add strict if control etc. on version 1.2.3 mablexidana
2015-11-01 18:24 ` Thomas Monjalon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).