From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f54.google.com (mail-lf0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D641094 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:24:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-lf0-f54.google.com with SMTP id k86so110484508lfi.0 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 07:24:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AhlmGKeAWWnmdJ5qW4hlUH7adKjI5VGfCsGReGtVTxI=; b=FxagmArxKWRt3780lFvCcwpPUN39hAz49ielYCKzX0pyzYVhsngWJuKX4alCUMQfEA ueRVpSv1hvw/UVh6Jr8/Yur1B6G8oJ4panc++COm52Sz+d2CNE/ZjgEh5WAFb+4AvDon li0lLf6BBPWxrTpVnem/qBGKyaPHrBxANRybDDXKMxmMo7elsWAHfSknU2vMb0lE/OdH XDG1r8AdDd0Sl8eZscEImV0YZW0nXUn79BR/mEb0zWOLI+uzM95+fdH0b/KXM4KAkTM7 G0nvNT1Pr14ZZguXUEyY7fDwcNkxwkcAMlwTEVHMaR1aQv5sVXrwWCDD3bckIId1rMYy V1LA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AhlmGKeAWWnmdJ5qW4hlUH7adKjI5VGfCsGReGtVTxI=; b=YXkEU/Gl1ohC2KqJVgfuYAE9SF6APjMhZhLU6dGtyr9mJmH1R1NPbA5ytZwssdQsLF Qy4jTtorOgZGHyGw4dWrXTsmOs/Jakp3AVQVTVl77GaasJXT8RV14sEfEd0pFUVurhgk U3OFM+xO90hqGjpOOLq+B8r29y7df5D/U1upX3Zst3cJFI2337/i3Fb9+gyZn2LB2ST9 31iqKAGI9z9f4Hp7vwGFsxT5UrIKbpntjTx3lhgLafBaEPbeo8P5RPyg4Rm5Ds+Bf6WE GF0jHl4iKVs9GX4coN3AUzoztQKgrw1YK0mJXpilJflD/O/TQQeIEJdHk2XVnv451qZv 8ZTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLmJkhuPRy4WHM0NxHCdYKkuUWd6YUHZbd76L7jZDXrUOIzUTTSvICrwdzsE9/FoYm9 X-Received: by 10.25.151.20 with SMTP id z20mr14588678lfd.92.1484666663020; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 07:24:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 28sm9229434ljw.17.2017.01.17.07.24.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 07:24:22 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" , Michal Miroslaw Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:24:21 +0100 Message-ID: <1502594.BWgYCgn4M3@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0F876A@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20161223014752.wicbgkvlotllsfc6@rere.qmqm.pl> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0F876A@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] acl: remove invalid test X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:24:24 -0000 2016-12-23 09:36, Ananyev, Konstantin: > From: Michal Miroslaw [mailto:mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl] > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 06:48:52PM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > > > I suppose that changes have to be inside: > > > [PATCH v2] acl: allow zero verdict. > > > > The 'allow zero verdict' patch depends on this one if we are to not have > > a breaking tests inbetween. > > Exactly, that's why I think they either has to be in one series of patches, > with this one coming first and ' PATCH v2] acl: allow zero verdict' as the second one, > or just merge them into one. No progress here. Konstantin, do you ack this patch? I could apply it as a standalone patch.