From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com (mail-wm0-f68.google.com [74.125.82.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44421B1AA for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 11:43:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id 131so13654146wmk.3 for ; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 02:43:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=5t3YiKTlxX77NBXMyjLwxgD25+C+k1qQ2URsGBsb8dA=; b=BQj7s3AY21/3ddeiBuSRKN+E1F2rfocEvvK2a4kbtbBx+taPprqe436HiaZHfs47Pm WkYsPh2UCs4G6Sdn/11xCXwUXKquglcMNODkLEktNw6nqFfJk+cL3ydGVdqnLim5zR3a urR3locbI97LJv0gSRxp0upk0zIs+SGrPkeJC0VKvXcXJGznDqdIej+c8BlcpTXn6WqB ECNHD4lYUkQVv7rwe3i9hJJniCNR3F7W/3SvII2kMzj62VhB2YKQhKdORMuraBkdQAln nkejZe4vJYQLF93HlM9dWJBn9VkjAjjf+3nvIhrQ4BnSALzcSf0Mf49hR+aVBHQ1kdhr QWTA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaViHvV9nVs8hcLtkOJXSHJF7DKeMd2fjREd+Ocv20qeJIxoPzm1 hOmrdweBT8Vk0Yv16KkcRpiwNtQV X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QAPb/jZztBXh3dswuNa5/cGZBPmZ/25HaDFbgMTnrG1DA2pT033ZJKK43IUDAgrN+EXo4ysQQ== X-Received: by 10.80.182.7 with SMTP id b7mr12649696ede.61.1507542233278; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 02:43:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([213.251.34.151]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s26sm6067039eds.68.2017.10.09.02.43.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 Oct 2017 02:43:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1507542231.28033.5.camel@debian.org> From: Luca Boccassi To: Yuanhan Liu , Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Mcnamara, John" Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 10:43:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20171009080137.GM1545@yliu-home> References: <2385365.XUACAUbIaV@xps> <20171009014420.GG1545@yliu-home> <3748687.9eGIfCGZ7i@xps> <20171009080137.GM1545@yliu-home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK 17.11 LTS X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:43:54 -0000 On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 16:01 +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 09:49:27AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 09/10/2017 03:44, Yuanhan Liu: > > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 07:12:45PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > 06/10/2017 18:25, Luca Boccassi: > > > > > On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 16:05 +0000, Mcnamara, John wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > At the recent DPDK 2017 Userspace in Dublin it was agreed > > > > > > that we > > > > > > should have a DPDK 17.11 LTS with 2 year support that would > > > > > > run in > > > > > > parallel with the DPDK 16.11 LTS. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > However, if order for this to happen the community will > > > > > > have to > > > > > > provide a maintainer, either for 17.11 LTS or for 16.11 LTS > > > > > > (to allow > > > > > > Yuanhan to move from 16.11 LTS maintenance to 17.11 LTS > > > > > > maintenance). > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Ideally this person should come from one of the OSVs. > > > > > > Either way if > > > > > > we don't get a volunteer we won't have a 17.11 LTS. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Volunteers please step forward. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > John > > > > >=20 > > > > > Hello John, > > > > >=20 > > > > > I was just about to write you :-) > > > > >=20 > > > > > I am available to volunteer. I've just got permission from > > > > > AT&T > > > > > management to dedicate some working hours every week to the > > > > > project > > > > > (this is the reason why I didn't say anything on the spot - I > > > > > needed to > > > > > ask first due to the time requirements). > > > > >=20 > > > > > I am fine with either 16.11 or 17.11, whichever Yuanhan > > > > > prefers. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Thanks! > > > >=20 > > > > Thanks a lot Luca, and welcome :) > > >=20 > > > +1 :) > > >=20 > > > > You will have to send me a public SSH key. > > >=20 > > > And we may should have a short chat, about the scripts I used for > > > managing > > > the stable/LTS releases. > > >=20 > > > > Yuanhan, how do you prefer to split the workload? > > >=20 > > > I'd prefer 17.11. > > >=20 > > > Thanks. > >=20 > > You mean that you are interested in managing 17.11 LTS yourself? > > So Luca would become the new maintainer of 16.11 LTS? >=20 > Yes. Luca, okay to you? Deal :-) I'll unicast you later today with a few questions, and we can chat about the scripts you use and everything else. Thanks! --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi