From: Anoob Joseph <anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>,
Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
Cc: Anoob Joseph <anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>,
Narayana Prasad <narayanaprasad.athreya@caviumnetworks.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix usage of incorrect port
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:32:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1513067545-19311-1-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1513006557-14898-1-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
When security offload is enabled, the packet should be forwarded on the
port configured in the SA. Security session will be configured on that
port only, and sending the packet on other ports could result in
unencrypted packets being sent out.
This would have performance improvements too, as the per packet LPM
lookup would be avoided for IPsec packets, in inline mode.
Fixes: ec17993a145a ("examples/ipsec-secgw: support security offload")
Signed-off-by: Anoob Joseph <anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
Acked-by: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
---
v5
* Updated comments as suggested by Akhil
v4
* Made get_hop_for_offload_pkt() be aware of the packet type (ipv4/ipv6) and
return success/error values accordingly
v3
* Bug fix (fixed a wrong if condition)
* Minor changes in documentation
v2:
* Updated documentation with the change in behavior for outbound inline
offloaded packets.
doc/guides/sample_app_ug/ipsec_secgw.rst | 10 ++-
examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/ipsec_secgw.rst b/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/ipsec_secgw.rst
index d6cfdbf..ae18acd 100644
--- a/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/ipsec_secgw.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/ipsec_secgw.rst
@@ -61,6 +61,12 @@ In case of complete protocol offload, the processing of headers(ESP and outer
IP header) is done by the hardware and the application does not need to
add/remove them during outbound/inbound processing.
+For inline offloaded outbound traffic, the application will not do the LPM
+lookup for routing, as the port on which the packet has to be forwarded will be
+part of the SA. Security parameters will be configured on that port only, and
+sending the packet on other ports could result in unencrypted packets being
+sent out.
+
The Path for IPsec Inbound traffic is:
* Read packets from the port.
@@ -543,7 +549,9 @@ where each options means:
``<port_id>``
* Port/device ID of the ethernet/crypto accelerator for which the SA is
- configured. This option is used when *type* is NOT *no-offload*
+ configured. For *inline-crypto-offload* and *inline-protocol-offload*, this
+ port will be used for routing. The routing table will not be referred in
+ this case.
* Optional: No, if *type* is not *no-offload*
diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
index c98454a..2a406ab 100644
--- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
+++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
@@ -585,31 +585,81 @@ process_pkts_outbound_nosp(struct ipsec_ctx *ipsec_ctx,
traffic->ip6.num = nb_pkts_out;
}
+static inline int32_t
+get_hop_for_offload_pkt(struct rte_mbuf *pkt, int is_ipv6)
+{
+ struct ipsec_mbuf_metadata *priv;
+ struct ipsec_sa *sa;
+
+ priv = get_priv(pkt);
+
+ sa = priv->sa;
+ if (unlikely(sa == NULL)) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC, "SA not saved in private data\n");
+ goto fail;
+ }
+
+ if (is_ipv6)
+ return sa->portid;
+
+ /* else */
+ return (sa->portid | RTE_LPM_LOOKUP_SUCCESS);
+
+fail:
+ if (is_ipv6)
+ return -1;
+
+ /* else */
+ return 0;
+}
+
static inline void
route4_pkts(struct rt_ctx *rt_ctx, struct rte_mbuf *pkts[], uint8_t nb_pkts)
{
uint32_t hop[MAX_PKT_BURST * 2];
uint32_t dst_ip[MAX_PKT_BURST * 2];
+ int32_t pkt_hop = 0;
uint16_t i, offset;
+ uint16_t lpm_pkts = 0;
if (nb_pkts == 0)
return;
+ /* Need to do an LPM lookup for non-inline packets. Inline packets will
+ * have port ID in the SA
+ */
+
for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
- offset = offsetof(struct ip, ip_dst);
- dst_ip[i] = *rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(pkts[i],
- uint32_t *, offset);
- dst_ip[i] = rte_be_to_cpu_32(dst_ip[i]);
+ if (!(pkts[i]->ol_flags & PKT_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD)) {
+ /* Security offload not enabled. So an LPM lookup is
+ * required to get the hop
+ */
+ offset = offsetof(struct ip, ip_dst);
+ dst_ip[lpm_pkts] = *rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(pkts[i],
+ uint32_t *, offset);
+ dst_ip[lpm_pkts] = rte_be_to_cpu_32(dst_ip[lpm_pkts]);
+ lpm_pkts++;
+ }
}
- rte_lpm_lookup_bulk((struct rte_lpm *)rt_ctx, dst_ip, hop, nb_pkts);
+ rte_lpm_lookup_bulk((struct rte_lpm *)rt_ctx, dst_ip, hop, lpm_pkts);
+
+ lpm_pkts = 0;
for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
- if ((hop[i] & RTE_LPM_LOOKUP_SUCCESS) == 0) {
+ if (pkts[i]->ol_flags & PKT_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD) {
+ /* Read hop from the SA */
+ pkt_hop = get_hop_for_offload_pkt(pkts[i], 0);
+ } else {
+ /* Need to use hop returned by lookup */
+ pkt_hop = hop[lpm_pkts++];
+ }
+
+ if ((pkt_hop & RTE_LPM_LOOKUP_SUCCESS) == 0) {
rte_pktmbuf_free(pkts[i]);
continue;
}
- send_single_packet(pkts[i], hop[i] & 0xff);
+ send_single_packet(pkts[i], pkt_hop & 0xff);
}
}
@@ -619,26 +669,49 @@ route6_pkts(struct rt_ctx *rt_ctx, struct rte_mbuf *pkts[], uint8_t nb_pkts)
int32_t hop[MAX_PKT_BURST * 2];
uint8_t dst_ip[MAX_PKT_BURST * 2][16];
uint8_t *ip6_dst;
+ int32_t pkt_hop = 0;
uint16_t i, offset;
+ uint16_t lpm_pkts = 0;
if (nb_pkts == 0)
return;
+ /* Need to do an LPM lookup for non-inline packets. Inline packets will
+ * have port ID in the SA
+ */
+
for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
- offset = offsetof(struct ip6_hdr, ip6_dst);
- ip6_dst = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(pkts[i], uint8_t *, offset);
- memcpy(&dst_ip[i][0], ip6_dst, 16);
+ if (!(pkts[i]->ol_flags & PKT_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD)) {
+ /* Security offload not enabled. So an LPM lookup is
+ * required to get the hop
+ */
+ offset = offsetof(struct ip6_hdr, ip6_dst);
+ ip6_dst = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(pkts[i], uint8_t *,
+ offset);
+ memcpy(&dst_ip[lpm_pkts][0], ip6_dst, 16);
+ lpm_pkts++;
+ }
}
- rte_lpm6_lookup_bulk_func((struct rte_lpm6 *)rt_ctx, dst_ip,
- hop, nb_pkts);
+ rte_lpm6_lookup_bulk_func((struct rte_lpm6 *)rt_ctx, dst_ip, hop,
+ lpm_pkts);
+
+ lpm_pkts = 0;
for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
- if (hop[i] == -1) {
+ if (pkts[i]->ol_flags & PKT_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD) {
+ /* Read hop from the SA */
+ pkt_hop = get_hop_for_offload_pkt(pkts[i], 1);
+ } else {
+ /* Need to use hop returned by lookup */
+ pkt_hop = hop[lpm_pkts++];
+ }
+
+ if (pkt_hop == -1) {
rte_pktmbuf_free(pkts[i]);
continue;
}
- send_single_packet(pkts[i], hop[i] & 0xff);
+ send_single_packet(pkts[i], pkt_hop & 0xff);
}
}
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-12 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-13 16:13 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Anoob Joseph
2017-11-13 17:23 ` Radu Nicolau
2017-11-13 19:24 ` Anoob Joseph
2017-11-14 12:01 ` Nicolau, Radu
2017-11-14 15:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Anoob Joseph
2017-11-14 16:16 ` Radu Nicolau
2017-11-15 9:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Anoob Joseph
2017-11-24 9:28 ` Akhil Goyal
2017-11-24 9:58 ` Anoob
2017-11-24 10:49 ` Akhil Goyal
2017-11-29 4:21 ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-04 7:49 ` Akhil Goyal
2017-12-06 11:08 ` Anoob
2017-12-11 10:26 ` Radu Nicolau
2017-12-11 10:38 ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-11 15:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Anoob Joseph
2017-12-12 6:54 ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-12 7:34 ` Akhil Goyal
2017-12-12 8:32 ` Anoob Joseph [this message]
2017-12-12 11:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Radu Nicolau
2017-12-14 9:01 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1513067545-19311-1-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com \
--to=anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=narayanaprasad.athreya@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
--cc=sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).