From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <luca.boccassi@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wr0-f194.google.com (mail-wr0-f194.google.com
 [209.85.128.194]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890791B016
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:27:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wr0-f194.google.com with SMTP id l19so6944886wrc.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 05:27:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to
 :references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
 bh=mmibsZKXdgFe7yBnc0+KyQtjcpu0/3Px0OK8cr0ku2s=;
 b=HKTm0ug8LDunU7lKl67S6mQVDVmZzY2kD0oDmvE+vu5ceViJLd4EO8XwpP/b5FWsjz
 /kEdGsrW2/6Fi7tWwmvdCAYFDFHxBdomgyr/mIG1kh+kMch+ZfXNwebEzC6RgBbNzlxo
 Mj3cdAfFIuHswRI0T38T7EN8T5Pjo2cMQi0/pqGN2Hwz7Wvkrj+PiElxaE4aPMEy9X2d
 MnW2Fcw0746H5HNJV3laJVd8H7HRUQ6yKhzNLayvH5uaqSiKa1H6BpsJzyGhLc0G/6nj
 2E0xzvelvaH6uMvnuIYRiMKCu8xaj8OzEvZaUez6iCnqvtrPgYZqQ9Hl/yoYjhVXk0aO
 6mSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mIuNfQqzt9PnxI9ObsMp7VDB9xIsg/mdi/AjlfTof+wlOaddnVL
 IxaXuNptPkGRAy4NvegYD6RQ4cHR5Os=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotGoPPGuxed3zB3m8jJHtHKh2C+XDIsq1PPd9bVk0zwQUrdSYidMF60SauwHnXJq4zL3fZ2qg==
X-Received: by 10.223.133.66 with SMTP id 60mr1664770wrh.49.1513690029056;
 Tue, 19 Dec 2017 05:27:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([213.251.34.146])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m18sm2228232wmc.18.2017.12.19.05.27.08
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256);
 Tue, 19 Dec 2017 05:27:08 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1513690027.25709.75.camel@debian.org>
From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:27:07 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20171219105338.198727-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
References: <20171219105338.198727-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] RFC build: prototype support for ARM
	builds
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:27:09 -0000

On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 10:53 +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> Add some skeleton files to enable compiling for ARM target. This has
> been
> tested by doing a cross-compile for armv8-a type using the linaro gcc
> toolchain.
>=20
> 	meson arm-build --cross-file aarch64_cross.txt
> 	ninja -C arm-build
>=20
> where aarch64_cross.txt contained the following
>=20
> 	[binaries]
> 	c =3D 'aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc'
> 	cpp =3D 'aarch64-linux-gnu-cpp'
> 	ar =3D 'aarch64-linux-gnu-ar'
>=20
> 	[host_machine]
> 	system =3D 'linux'
> 	cpu_family =3D 'aarch64'
> 	cpu =3D 'armv8-a'
> 	endian =3D 'little'
>=20
> It is hoped that those working on arm architecture can use this as a
> baseline
> to add arm support - both native compiled and cross-compiled - to the
> meson
> build.

Can't comment on ARM functionality, but shouldn't the new files use
SPDX ids rather than the full license header?

--=20
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi