From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: optimizing the rte_kni_rx_burst
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 22:20:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1520998.LI3zsdbzN8@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1791036.bZfV7z791K@xps13>
Ping
2014-11-11 23:58, Thomas Monjalon:
> Is there anyone interested in KNI to review this patch please?
>
>
> 2014-07-23 12:15, Hemant Agrawal:
> > The current implementation of rte_kni_rx_burst polls the fifo for buffers.
> > Irrespective of success or failure, it allocates the mbuf and try to put them into the alloc_q
> > if the buffers are not added to alloc_q, it frees them.
> > This waste lots of cpu cycles in allocating and freeing the buffers if alloc_q is full.
> >
> > The logic has been changed to:
> > 1. Initially allocand add buffer(burstsize) to alloc_q
> > 2. Add buffers to alloc_q only when you are pulling out the buffers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <Hemant@freescale.com>
> > ---
> > lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c | 8 ++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
> > index 76feef4..01e85f8 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
> > @@ -263,6 +263,9 @@ rte_kni_alloc(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool,
> >
> > ctx->in_use = 1;
> >
> > + /* Allocate mbufs and then put them into alloc_q */
> > + kni_allocate_mbufs(ctx);
> > +
> > return ctx;
> >
> > fail:
> > @@ -369,8 +372,9 @@ rte_kni_rx_burst(struct rte_kni *kni, struct rte_mbuf **mbufs, unsigned num)
> > {
> > unsigned ret = kni_fifo_get(kni->tx_q, (void **)mbufs, num);
> >
> > - /* Allocate mbufs and then put them into alloc_q */
> > - kni_allocate_mbufs(kni);
> > + /* If buffers removed, allocate mbufs and then put them into alloc_q */
> > + if(ret)
> > + kni_allocate_mbufs(kni);
> >
> > return ret;
> > }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-26 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-23 6:45 Hemant Agrawal
2014-11-11 22:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-26 21:20 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2015-01-30 9:59 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-02-24 1:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1520998.LI3zsdbzN8@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).