From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Declan Doherty <declan.dohery@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] crypto drivers in the API
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:25:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1522880.cuOTJ3FilR@xps13> (raw)
In the crypto API, the drivers are listed.
In my opinion, it is a wrong designed and these lists should be removed.
Do we need a deprecation notice to plan this removal in 17.05, while
working on bus abstraction?
lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h:
#define CRYPTODEV_NAME_NULL_PMD crypto_null
/**< Null crypto PMD device name */
#define CRYPTODEV_NAME_AESNI_MB_PMD crypto_aesni_mb
/**< AES-NI Multi buffer PMD device name */
#define CRYPTODEV_NAME_AESNI_GCM_PMD crypto_aesni_gcm
/**< AES-NI GCM PMD device name */
#define CRYPTODEV_NAME_OPENSSL_PMD crypto_openssl
/**< Open SSL Crypto PMD device name */
#define CRYPTODEV_NAME_QAT_SYM_PMD crypto_qat
/**< Intel QAT Symmetric Crypto PMD device name */
#define CRYPTODEV_NAME_SNOW3G_PMD crypto_snow3g
/**< SNOW 3G PMD device name */
#define CRYPTODEV_NAME_KASUMI_PMD crypto_kasumi
/**< KASUMI PMD device name */
#define CRYPTODEV_NAME_ZUC_PMD crypto_zuc
/**< KASUMI PMD device name */
#define CRYPTODEV_NAME_ARMV8_PMD crypto_armv8
/**< ARMv8 Crypto PMD device name */
#define CRYPTODEV_NAME_SCHEDULER_PMD crypto_scheduler
/**< Scheduler Crypto PMD device name */
/** Crypto device type */
enum rte_cryptodev_type {
RTE_CRYPTODEV_NULL_PMD = 1, /**< Null crypto PMD */
RTE_CRYPTODEV_AESNI_GCM_PMD, /**< AES-NI GCM PMD */
RTE_CRYPTODEV_AESNI_MB_PMD, /**< AES-NI multi buffer PMD */
RTE_CRYPTODEV_QAT_SYM_PMD, /**< QAT PMD Symmetric Crypto */
RTE_CRYPTODEV_SNOW3G_PMD, /**< SNOW 3G PMD */
RTE_CRYPTODEV_KASUMI_PMD, /**< KASUMI PMD */
RTE_CRYPTODEV_ZUC_PMD, /**< ZUC PMD */
RTE_CRYPTODEV_OPENSSL_PMD, /**< OpenSSL PMD */
RTE_CRYPTODEV_ARMV8_PMD, /**< ARMv8 crypto PMD */
RTE_CRYPTODEV_SCHEDULER_PMD, /**< Crypto Scheduler PMD */
};
next reply other threads:[~2017-02-13 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-13 13:25 Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2017-02-13 13:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-02-14 10:44 ` Doherty, Declan
2017-02-14 11:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-02-14 14:46 ` Doherty, Declan
2017-02-14 15:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1522880.cuOTJ3FilR@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=declan.dohery@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).