From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538871B197 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 23:25:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A857720BE3; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:25:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 05 Oct 2017 17:25:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=a6VIUsKPE+Y7yWD WFK/7ywVGYUmJnYwoSZQC3SsHj4w=; b=T599c8oRpWjqicF2Zm5tS/M6w0rwJNU zJ+QVuk5WIlq5lvMplh52THM9stHXRN225g1FC7KEBEMCgnAwwbVSZz9iqA2BhKk yB8tRinJ/qXPBhmHcBPgXUI+agLsuW1k6EnQmRsiU2r/NJ64sPy6A4dvOGsmIoz3 K1doHfTWewa0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=a6VIUsKPE+Y7yWDWFK/7ywVGYUmJnYwoSZQC3SsHj4w=; b=V0LjDrSy 3/HKC7tr7XNa046METfPmWsB3ODZD90syPCjOJ5vcOlLFb8xc8fjfgqrRWKCj0lK leoxJkNy4AhLlFkmGYN32TUHlRl6l3UklZCmWjB3gNQJliEyky2Tvccg2P2AIDty LCeeqOcslrGla9lkooRPcl6fVEj9kfkM0r+4g7be2xfJp/Qq4iKf7nD/6hhHmWxH tzfHf+Hi7QlXaVULLmHO6JVCk1Azqk1MXo2TAB16PVbtykd/xVj/uVJ4/1745VKN D7fmRwlsBZLpyF9hoHqizW8hF1t9/1FQDSwK0/YkiJKnbe41tBr+m23EwFy9sLnN pvXN4ftipmz2hw== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: A6rlvwUCSZrEAPvTyRKNVKYqQz3hA4tcGV0P9/5tA/YA 1507238732 Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5F96B7F91F; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:25:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Olivier Matz Cc: dev@dpdk.org, venki497@gmail.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, anatoly.burakov@intel.com Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 23:25:31 +0200 Message-ID: <1525768.9gvZ9QhgDq@xps> In-Reply-To: <20170920113216.1869-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> References: <20170907122033.17983-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <20170920113216.1869-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] ring: increase maximum ring size X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 21:25:33 -0000 20/09/2017 13:32, Olivier Matz: > There is no reason to prevent ring from being larger than 0x0FFFFFFF. > Increase the maximum size to 0x7FFFFFFF, which is the maximum possible > without changing the code and the structure definition (size is stored > on a uint32_t). > > Link: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-September/074701.html > > Suggested-by: Venkatesh Nuthula > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz > Reviewed-by: Anatoly Burakov Applied, thanks