DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Revert "timer: get TSC frequency from /proc/cpuinfo"
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 14:23:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1530885.SuHPsB8m1S@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1396875448-14778-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com>

2014-04-07 13:57, Bruce Richardson:
> This reverts commit da6fd0759cbeb5fc14991a79e40105b9f6b99059.
> 
> The use of cpuinfo to determine the frequency of the TSC is not
> advisable and leads to incorrect results when power management is
> in use. This is because, while the TSC frequency does not change
> in modern cpus with constant_tsc support, the frequency of the core,
> and hence the frequency of the core reported by cpuinfo *does* change.
> 
> Depending on the current frequency of core 0 when an application is
> started, the EAL can get a wildly incorrect value for the TSC freq.
> Since frequency is scaled down for power saving, any incorrect value
> is likely to be lower than the default, which means that any delay
> loops inside the code which rely on the TSC will be shorter than
> planned. This can cause issues (reported on the mailing list by a number
> of people) where ports are not initialized correctly due to delays being
> too short.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

I agree that using CPU frequency for TSC calibration is wrong with 
constant_tsc support. The goal was to have a precise calibration but the 
result is the reverse because of constant TSC.

Acked and applied.

Thank you Bruce for catching this.
-- 
Thomas

      reply	other threads:[~2014-04-09 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-07 12:57 Bruce Richardson
2014-04-09 12:23 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1530885.SuHPsB8m1S@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).