From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, anatoly.burakov@intel.com,
olivier.matz@6wind.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] rte_ring: clarify preemptible nature of ring algorithm
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 23:00:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1531195247-22612-1-git-send-email-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> (raw)
rte_ring implementation is not preemptible only under certain
circumstances. This clarification is helpful for data plane and
control plane communication using rte_ring.
Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljedahl@arm.com>
---
v3:
* Corrected known issues for rte_ring
* Referred to known issues in rte_ring.h (Burakov, Oliver)
v2:
* Fixed checkpatch warnings
doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst | 27 ++++++++++++++-----------
lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst
index a22640d..f47a4be 100644
--- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst
@@ -435,23 +435,26 @@ Known Issues
The "non-preemptive" constraint means:
- - a pthread doing multi-producers enqueues on a given ring must not
- be preempted by another pthread doing a multi-producer enqueue on
- the same ring.
- - a pthread doing multi-consumers dequeues on a given ring must not
- be preempted by another pthread doing a multi-consumer dequeue on
- the same ring.
+ A preempted pthread can block other pthreads (operating on the same ring)
+ from completing their operations, only if those pthreads are performing
+ the same ring operation (enqueue/dequeue) as the preempted pthread.
+ In other words, a preempted consumer pthread will not block any producer
+ pthreads and vice versa.
- Bypassing this constraint may cause the 2nd pthread to spin until the 1st one is scheduled again.
- Moreover, if the 1st pthread is preempted by a context that has an higher priority, it may even cause a dead lock.
+ Bypassing this constraint may cause other pthreads to spin until the preempted pthread is scheduled again.
+ Moreover, if the pthread is preempted by a context that has a higher priority, it may even cause a dead lock.
- This does not mean it cannot be used, simply, there is a need to narrow down the situation when it is used by multi-pthread on the same core.
+ This means, use cases involving preemptible pthreads should consider using rte_ring carefully.
- 1. It CAN be used for any single-producer or single-consumer situation.
+ 1. It CAN be used for preemptible single-producer and single-consumer use case.
- 2. It MAY be used by multi-producer/consumer pthread whose scheduling policy are all SCHED_OTHER(cfs). User SHOULD be aware of the performance penalty before using it.
+ 2. It CAN be used for non-preemptible multi-producer and preemptible single-consumer use case.
- 3. It MUST not be used by multi-producer/consumer pthreads, whose scheduling policies are SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR.
+ 3. It CAN be used for preemptible single-producer and non-preemptible multi-consumer use case.
+
+ 4. It MAY be used by preemptible multi-producer and/or preemptible multi-consumer pthreads whose scheduling policy are all SCHED_OTHER(cfs), SCHED_IDLE or SCHED_BATCH. User SHOULD be aware of the performance penalty before using it.
+
+ 5. It MUST not be used by multi-producer/consumer pthreads, whose scheduling policies are SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR.
+ rte_timer
diff --git a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h
index 1245822..e680101 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h
@@ -26,8 +26,9 @@
* - Bulk dequeue.
* - Bulk enqueue.
*
- * Note: the ring implementation is not preemptable. A lcore must not
- * be interrupted by another task that uses the same ring.
+ * Note: the ring implementation is not preemptible. Refer to Programmer's
+ * guide/Environment Abstraction Layer/Multiple pthread/Known Issues/rte_ring
+ * for more information.
*
*/
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2018-07-10 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-10 4:00 Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2018-07-16 7:00 ` Olivier Matz
2018-07-16 16:28 ` Burakov, Anatoly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1531195247-22612-1-git-send-email-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).