From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com (mail-wr1-f52.google.com [209.85.221.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F28231E; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:36:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id v17-v6so4861994wrr.9; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:36:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=WFWAWZ1o7eFM/0BQSEL53FJG5WO5x0KkeEh38p3PhX4=; b=bFzzP7f2wTXdQ5N5bNTbrmY0Rt5cdwmCxSsDfHs4EH8PuYqXwL9+tZkke/kwLxwZNj ZW7qbNOWSAvUEd55RboKjTjzqh3QRFwGsLJglSTj3HQci5ivDKPjiCs6cJT32zP4BBMT rkQzUeQW0M8e3SJ1APWxEuz6gcDZl6cIjj16YK1ngswQdze77VfyvSqy+hbO3lQQhaCY f0FV0gRSLksRmLVAtwAmCn9sTmKjh+CKo3iUZQ22rTEizeUOVgXnSsjJcXNHd7sD984s ggc1LzxG3vFb/IheqQQqTPbsrW0Qe380cdpRSyj1cjgfRUbQ4B5q3ewbwAYkIsoMuilt d8Yg== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BvntbNU33Hcos2oVk8A7wIEWQO9iVnYTYW1ecs4OanDFKbXxOz mAeHO86t/fHZCO0QJaP0/yg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdbU9bkzwrXo431fHWwpvBTP9NNQMnmj67GvYJSHQvSNmAcnxgaDdz/z6DOBY8pnvu2a8diTKg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:434c:: with SMTP id u12-v6mr4331783wrr.189.1535549811676; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:36:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2001:1be0:110d:fcfe:41aa:5bfa:6cf3:7531]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f13-v6sm4580990wrt.9.2018.08.29.06.36.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:36:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1535549808.11823.1.camel@debian.org> From: Luca Boccassi To: Marco Varlese , dpdk stable Cc: dev@dpdk.org, radu.nicolau@intel.com, qi.z.zhang@intel.com Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 14:36:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20180813182103.28045-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <1535014539.5764.128.camel@debian.org> <1535386654.8636.12.camel@debian.org> <1535536543.1113.31.camel@debian.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] 16.11.8 (LTS) patches review and test X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 13:36:52 -0000 Great, thank you very much. I'll push the release later tonight. On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 15:28 +0200, Marco Varlese wrote: > Hi Luca & all, >=20 > I confirm tests carried out via test_pmd and Ovs-DPDK do not show any > regression > for us. >=20 >=20 > Cheers, > Marco >=20 > On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 10:55 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-08-27 at 17:17 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > On Thu, 2018-08-23 at 09:55 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 19:21 +0100, luca.boccassi@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > >=20 > > > > > Here is a list of patches targeted for LTS release 16.11.8. > > > > > Please > > > > > help review and test. The planned date for the final release > > > > > is > > > > > August > > > > > the 23rd. > > > > > Before that, please shout if anyone has objections with these > > > > > patches being applied. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Also for the companies committed to running regression tests, > > > > > please run the tests and report any issue before the release > > > > > date. > > > > >=20 > > > > > A release candidate tarball can be found at: > > > > >=20 > > > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?= id=3Dv16.11.8-rc1 > > > > >=20 > > > > > These patches are located at branch 16.11 of dpdk-stable > > > > > repo: > > > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ > > > > >=20 > > > > > Thanks. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Luca Boccassi > > > >=20 > > > > Hi, > > > >=20 > > > > Regression tests from Intel have highlighted a possible issue > > > > with > > > > the > > > > changes (unidentified as of now), so while investigation is in > > > > progress > > > > we decided to postpone the release to Monday the 27th to be on > > > > the > > > > safe > > > > side. > > > > Apologies for any issues this might cause. > > >=20 > > > Hi, > > >=20 > > > Unfortunately triaging is still in progress, so it's better to > > > postpone > > > again, to Wednesday the 29th of August. > > > Apologies again for any issues due to this delay. > >=20 > > Hello all, > >=20 > > I've pushed an -rc2 with the following additional changes: > >=20 > > Luca Boccassi (1): > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0Revert "net/i40e: fix packet count = for PF" > >=20 > > Radu Nicolau (3): > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0net/null: add MAC address setting f= ake operation > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0test/virtual_pmd: add MAC address s= etting fake op > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0test/bonding: assign non-zero MAC t= o null devices > >=20 > > Radu, I cherry-picked the following 3 patches that you got merged > > in > > 18.02 as they are necessary to fix bonding regression tests from > > Intel: > >=20 > > c5ac7748fd6bfd86b6fb4432b6792733cf32c94c > > c23fc36284e26fca9b52641118ad76a4da99d7af > > e8df563bac263e55b7dd9d45a00417aa92ef66cb > >=20 > > Qi, I have reverted the following patch that was backported to > > 16.11.4 > > as it breaks a Fortville regression test from Intel: > >=20 > > 4bf705a7d74b0b4c1d82ad0821c43e32be15a5e5. > >=20 > > Marco, is there any chance you've got time today to re-run your > > tests? > > These changes in rc2 have been blessed by Intel and AT&T, so if it > > works for you as well I can then release later tonight. > >=20 > > A release candidate tarball can be found at: > >=20 > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=3Dv= 16.11.8-rc2 > >=20 > > These patches are located at branch 16.11 of dpdk-stable repo: > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ > >=20 > > Thanks! > >=20 --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi