DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: longtb5@viettel.com.vn
To: reshma.pattan@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Bao-Long Tran <longtb5@viettel.com.vn>, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] latency: clear mbuf timestamp after latency calculation
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 15:22:56 +0700 (ICT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1537345834-70456-1-git-send-email-longtb5@viettel.com.vn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1537345496-70207-1-git-send-email-longtb5@viettel.com.vn>

The timestamp of a mbuf should be cleared after that mbuf was used for
latency calculation, otherwise future packets which reuse the same mbuf
would inherit that previous timestamp. The latencystats library looks
for mbuf with non-zero timestamp, thus incorrectly inherited value would
result in incorrect latency measurement.

Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Bao-Long Tran <longtb5@viettel.com.vn>
---
 lib/librte_latencystats/rte_latencystats.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_latencystats/rte_latencystats.c b/lib/librte_latencystats/rte_latencystats.c
index 1fdec68..2d5384e 100644
--- a/lib/librte_latencystats/rte_latencystats.c
+++ b/lib/librte_latencystats/rte_latencystats.c
@@ -156,8 +156,10 @@ calc_latency(uint16_t pid __rte_unused,
 
 	now = rte_rdtsc();
 	for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
-		if (pkts[i]->timestamp)
+		if (pkts[i]->timestamp) {
 			latency[cnt++] = now - pkts[i]->timestamp;
+			pkts[i]->timestamp = 0;
+		}
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
-- 
2.7.4

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-19  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-19  8:17 [dpdk-dev] Incorrect latencystats implementation longtb5
2018-09-19  8:22 ` longtb5 [this message]
2018-09-20 10:25   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] latency: clear mbuf timestamp after latency calculation Pattan, Reshma
2018-09-20 12:16     ` longtb5
2018-09-20 11:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " longtb5
2018-09-20 13:08 ` [dpdk-dev] Incorrect latencystats implementation Pattan, Reshma
2018-09-21  1:58   ` longtb5
2018-09-21 11:15     ` Pattan, Reshma
2018-09-21 12:14       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-09-21 14:58         ` Pattan, Reshma
2018-09-19  8:18 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] latency: clear mbuf timestamp after latency calculation longtb5

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1537345834-70456-1-git-send-email-longtb5@viettel.com.vn \
    --to=longtb5@viettel.com.vn \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).