DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"Varghese, Vipin" <vipin.varghese@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] service: fix memory leak by rte_service_init
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 14:18:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1539962.QZfzRtm2f4@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E923DB57A917B54B9182A2E928D00FA650FFF798@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>

26/01/2018 11:10, Van Haaren, Harry:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> > Your patches have been set to "Not Applicable" in patchwork.
> > What happened?
> 
> There was some confusion in my review-comments, and Vipin and I discussed
> the best was to rework - I suggested marking the current patches as Not Applicable.
> 
> Is there a better state to put the patches in Patchwork if we don't want commiters to look at them?
> Or would an email to the thread stating V+1 in progress be better?

Yes, an email is always good to notify about the status.
In patchwork, you can use the state "Changes requested".
"Not Applicable" is used for patches which were never intended
to be applicable.

> A new version will hit the ML soon.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-26 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-31 14:46 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] " Vipin Varghese
2018-01-08 10:17 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2018-01-08 14:40   ` Bruce Richardson
2018-01-11 18:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Vipin Varghese
2018-01-25 22:10   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-26 10:10     ` Van Haaren, Harry
2018-01-26 13:18       ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-01-26 20:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Vipin Varghese
2018-01-26 15:20     ` Van Haaren, Harry
2018-01-26 16:54       ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1539962.QZfzRtm2f4@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=vipin.varghese@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).