DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Reshma Pattan <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
Cc: stable@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org, anatoly.burakov@intel.com,
	jananeex.m.parthasarathy@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v5 10/10] mk: remove unnecessary make rules of test
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 22:08:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1541166.PTxugTrkH4@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1531843225-14638-11-git-send-email-reshma.pattan@intel.com>

17/07/2018 18:00, Reshma Pattan:
> make rule test-basic is duplicate of test rule.
> removed unused test-mempool and test-ring make rules.
> 
> Fixes: a3df7f8d9c ("mk: rename test related rules")
> Fixes: a3df7f8d9c ("mk: rename test related rules")
> CC: stable@dpdk.org
> CC: ferruh.yigit@intel.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Reshma Pattan <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
> ---
> -.PHONY: test test-basic test-fast test-ring test-mempool test-perf coverage test-drivers test-dump
> -test test-basic test-fast test-ring test-mempool test-perf coverage test-drivers test-dump:
> +.PHONY: test test-fast test-perf coverage test-drivers test-dump
> +test test-fast test-perf coverage test-drivers test-dump:

Why keeping test-ring test-mempool ?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-26 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-17 16:00 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/10] Make unit tests great again Reshma Pattan
2018-07-17 16:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 01/10] autotest: fix printing Reshma Pattan
2018-07-17 16:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 02/10] autotest: fix invalid code on reports Reshma Pattan
2018-07-17 16:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 03/10] autotest: make autotest runner python 2/3 compliant Reshma Pattan
2018-07-17 16:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 04/10] autotest: visually separate different test categories Reshma Pattan
2018-07-17 16:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 05/10] autotest: improve filtering Reshma Pattan
2018-07-17 16:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 06/10] autotest: remove autotest grouping Reshma Pattan
2018-07-17 16:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 07/10] autotest: properly parallelize unit tests Reshma Pattan
2018-07-17 16:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 08/10] autotest: update autotest test case list Reshma Pattan
2018-07-17 16:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 09/10] mk: update make targets for classified testcases Reshma Pattan
2018-07-18  8:55   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-07-17 16:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 10/10] mk: remove unnecessary make rules of test Reshma Pattan
2018-07-18  8:56   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-07-26 20:08   ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-07-27  8:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Pattan, Reshma
2018-07-27  8:45       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-07-26 20:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/10] Make unit tests great again Thomas Monjalon
2018-07-27  8:36   ` Pattan, Reshma
2018-07-27  8:51     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-07-27 10:12   ` Pattan, Reshma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1541166.PTxugTrkH4@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=jananeex.m.parthasarathy@intel.com \
    --cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).