DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, jerinj@marvell.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com,
	bruce.richardson@intel.com, chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, nd@arm.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com,
	Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] test/ring: ring perf test case enhancement
Date: Wed,  2 Jan 2019 08:55:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1546390533-53868-2-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1546390533-53868-1-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com>

From: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>

Run ring perf test on all available cores to really verify MPMC operations.
The old way of running on a pair of cores is not enough for MPMC rings. We
used this test case for ring optimization and it was really helpful for
measuring the ring performance in multi-core environment.

Suggested-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ola Liljedahl <Ola.Liljedahl@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
---
 test/test/test_ring_perf.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/test/test_ring_perf.c b/test/test/test_ring_perf.c
index ebb3939..01c6937 100644
--- a/test/test/test_ring_perf.c
+++ b/test/test/test_ring_perf.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 #include <rte_cycles.h>
 #include <rte_launch.h>
 #include <rte_pause.h>
-
+#include <string.h>
 #include "test.h"
 
 /*
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
  *  * Empty ring dequeue
  *  * Enqueue/dequeue of bursts in 1 threads
  *  * Enqueue/dequeue of bursts in 2 threads
+ *  * Enqueue/dequeue of bursts in all available threads
  */
 
 #define RING_NAME "RING_PERF"
@@ -248,9 +249,80 @@ run_on_core_pair(struct lcore_pair *cores, struct rte_ring *r,
 	}
 }
 
+static rte_atomic32_t synchro;
+static uint64_t queue_count[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
+
+#define TIME_MS 100
+
+static int
+load_loop_fn(void *p)
+{
+	uint64_t time_diff = 0;
+	uint64_t begin = 0;
+	uint64_t hz = rte_get_timer_hz();
+	uint64_t lcount = 0;
+	const unsigned int lcore = rte_lcore_id();
+	struct thread_params *params = p;
+	void *burst[MAX_BURST] = {0};
+
+	/* wait synchro for slaves */
+	if (lcore != rte_get_master_lcore())
+		while (rte_atomic32_read(&synchro) == 0)
+			rte_pause();
+
+	begin = rte_get_timer_cycles();
+	while (time_diff < hz * TIME_MS / 1000) {
+		rte_ring_mp_enqueue_bulk(params->r, burst, params->size, NULL);
+		rte_ring_mc_dequeue_bulk(params->r, burst, params->size, NULL);
+		lcount++;
+		time_diff = rte_get_timer_cycles() - begin;
+	}
+	queue_count[lcore] = lcount;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+run_on_all_cores(struct rte_ring *r)
+{
+	uint64_t total = 0;
+	unsigned int i, c;
+	struct thread_params param;
+
+	memset(&param, 0, sizeof(struct thread_params));
+	for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(bulk_sizes); i++) {
+		printf("\nBulk enq/dequeue count on size %u\n", bulk_sizes[i]);
+		param.size = bulk_sizes[i];
+		param.r = r;
+
+		/* clear synchro and start slaves */
+		rte_atomic32_set(&synchro, 0);
+		if (rte_eal_mp_remote_launch(load_loop_fn,
+				&param, SKIP_MASTER) < 0)
+			return -1;
+
+		/* start synchro and launch test on master */
+		rte_atomic32_set(&synchro, 1);
+		load_loop_fn(&param);
+
+		rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
+
+		RTE_LCORE_FOREACH(c) {
+			printf("Core [%u] count = %"PRIu64"\n",
+					c, queue_count[c]);
+			total += queue_count[c];
+		}
+
+		printf("Total count (size: %u): %"PRIu64"\n", bulk_sizes[i],
+						total);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
- * Test function that determines how long an enqueue + dequeue of a single item
- * takes on a single lcore. Result is for comparison with the bulk enq+deq.
+ * Test function that determines how long an enqueue + dequeue of a single
+ * item takes on a single lcore. Result is for comparison with the bulk
+ * enq+deq.
  */
 static void
 test_single_enqueue_dequeue(struct rte_ring *r)
@@ -394,6 +466,10 @@ test_ring_perf(void)
 		printf("\n### Testing using two NUMA nodes ###\n");
 		run_on_core_pair(&cores, r, enqueue_bulk, dequeue_bulk);
 	}
+
+	printf("\n### Testing using all slave nodes ###\n");
+	run_on_all_cores(r);
+
 	rte_ring_free(r);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.7.4

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-02  0:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-02  0:55 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] add rte ring reset api and use it to flush a ring by hash Gavin Hu
2019-01-02  0:55 ` Gavin Hu [this message]
2019-01-02 12:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] test/ring: ring perf test case enhancement Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-03  2:40     ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-01-02  0:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] ring: add reset api to flush the ring when not in use Gavin Hu
2019-01-02  0:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] hash: flush the rings instead of dequeuing one by one Gavin Hu
2019-01-02 12:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] add rte ring reset api and use it to flush a ring by hash Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-02 18:40   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-01-03  2:43     ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-01-03  2:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] ring test enhancement and new ring reset api and use it " gavin hu
2019-01-03  2:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] test/ring: ring perf test case enhancement gavin hu
2019-01-03  7:39     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-03  8:22       ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-01-09 11:31     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] ring test enhancement and new ring reset api and use it by hash gavin hu
2019-01-09 11:31     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] test/ring: ring perf test case enhancement gavin hu
2019-09-09  5:19       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] " Joyce Kong
2019-10-08  8:07         ` Olivier Matz
2019-10-24  7:56           ` David Marchand
2019-01-09 11:31     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] ring: add reset API to flush the ring when not in use gavin hu
2019-01-09 11:31     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] hash: flush the rings instead of dequeuing one by one gavin hu
2019-01-09 18:53       ` Wang, Yipeng1
2019-01-03  2:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] ring: add reset API to flush the ring when not in use gavin hu
2019-01-03  2:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] hash: flush the rings instead of dequeuing one by one gavin hu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1546390533-53868-2-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com \
    --to=gavin.hu@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=joyce.kong@arm.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).