From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF3A1B130 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 03:38:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC9A1596; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 18:38:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from net-arm-c2400.shanghai.arm.com (net-arm-c2400.shanghai.arm.com [10.169.40.108]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4FFFC3F5AF; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 18:38:28 -0800 (PST) From: gavin hu To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: nd@arm.com, thomas@monjalon.net, jerinj@marvell.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, gavin.hu@arm.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, Joyce Kong Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 10:38:12 +0800 Message-Id: <1546483094-29712-2-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1546483094-29712-1-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com> References: <1546390533-53868-1-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com> <1546483094-29712-1-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] test/ring: ring perf test case enhancement X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 02:38:31 -0000 From: Joyce Kong Run ring perf test on all available cores to really verify MPMC operations. The old way of running on a pair of cores is not enough for MPMC rings. Suggested-by: gavin hu Signed-off-by: joyce kong Reviewed-by: ruifeng wang Reviewed-by: honnappa nagarahalli Reviewed-by: dharmik thakkar Reviewed-by: ola liljedahl Reviewed-by: gavin hu --- test/test/test_ring_perf.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/test/test_ring_perf.c b/test/test/test_ring_perf.c index ebb3939..01c6937 100644 --- a/test/test/test_ring_perf.c +++ b/test/test/test_ring_perf.c @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ #include #include #include - +#include #include "test.h" /* @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ * * Empty ring dequeue * * Enqueue/dequeue of bursts in 1 threads * * Enqueue/dequeue of bursts in 2 threads + * * Enqueue/dequeue of bursts in all available threads */ #define RING_NAME "RING_PERF" @@ -248,9 +249,80 @@ run_on_core_pair(struct lcore_pair *cores, struct rte_ring *r, } } +static rte_atomic32_t synchro; +static uint64_t queue_count[RTE_MAX_LCORE]; + +#define TIME_MS 100 + +static int +load_loop_fn(void *p) +{ + uint64_t time_diff = 0; + uint64_t begin = 0; + uint64_t hz = rte_get_timer_hz(); + uint64_t lcount = 0; + const unsigned int lcore = rte_lcore_id(); + struct thread_params *params = p; + void *burst[MAX_BURST] = {0}; + + /* wait synchro for slaves */ + if (lcore != rte_get_master_lcore()) + while (rte_atomic32_read(&synchro) == 0) + rte_pause(); + + begin = rte_get_timer_cycles(); + while (time_diff < hz * TIME_MS / 1000) { + rte_ring_mp_enqueue_bulk(params->r, burst, params->size, NULL); + rte_ring_mc_dequeue_bulk(params->r, burst, params->size, NULL); + lcount++; + time_diff = rte_get_timer_cycles() - begin; + } + queue_count[lcore] = lcount; + return 0; +} + +static int +run_on_all_cores(struct rte_ring *r) +{ + uint64_t total = 0; + unsigned int i, c; + struct thread_params param; + + memset(¶m, 0, sizeof(struct thread_params)); + for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(bulk_sizes); i++) { + printf("\nBulk enq/dequeue count on size %u\n", bulk_sizes[i]); + param.size = bulk_sizes[i]; + param.r = r; + + /* clear synchro and start slaves */ + rte_atomic32_set(&synchro, 0); + if (rte_eal_mp_remote_launch(load_loop_fn, + ¶m, SKIP_MASTER) < 0) + return -1; + + /* start synchro and launch test on master */ + rte_atomic32_set(&synchro, 1); + load_loop_fn(¶m); + + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); + + RTE_LCORE_FOREACH(c) { + printf("Core [%u] count = %"PRIu64"\n", + c, queue_count[c]); + total += queue_count[c]; + } + + printf("Total count (size: %u): %"PRIu64"\n", bulk_sizes[i], + total); + } + + return 0; +} + /* - * Test function that determines how long an enqueue + dequeue of a single item - * takes on a single lcore. Result is for comparison with the bulk enq+deq. + * Test function that determines how long an enqueue + dequeue of a single + * item takes on a single lcore. Result is for comparison with the bulk + * enq+deq. */ static void test_single_enqueue_dequeue(struct rte_ring *r) @@ -394,6 +466,10 @@ test_ring_perf(void) printf("\n### Testing using two NUMA nodes ###\n"); run_on_core_pair(&cores, r, enqueue_bulk, dequeue_bulk); } + + printf("\n### Testing using all slave nodes ###\n"); + run_on_all_cores(r); + rte_ring_free(r); return 0; } -- 2.7.4