From: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, anatoly.burakov@intel.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] timer: don't check tsc flags in secondary processes
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 02:42:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <156620773023.46233.9134599999619749565.stgit@jrharri1-skx> (raw)
check_tsc_flags() parses /proc/cpuinfo and prints
warning messages if any cores don't have constant_tsc
and nonstop_tsc. It has no functional meaning.
This consumes a noticeable amount of time in
secondary processes - on my test system, it consumes
21ms out of the 66ms total execution time for
rte_eal_init().
So let's just skip checking these flags in secondary
processes. Since the primary process is already
parsing the entirety of /proc/cpuinfo, the warning
printed in the primary process should be sufficient.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
---
lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_timer.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_timer.c b/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_timer.c
index 76ec17034..ce447d43b 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_timer.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_timer.c
@@ -198,6 +198,15 @@ check_tsc_flags(void)
char line[512];
FILE *stream;
+ if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
+ /* This function just prints warnings if TSC is not constant
+ * and has no functional meaning. It also checks *all* cores
+ * on the system, not just the ones configured for this process.
+ * So don't bother rechecking again in secondary processes.
+ */
+ return;
+ }
+
stream = fopen("/proc/cpuinfo", "r");
if (!stream) {
RTE_LOG(WARNING, EAL, "WARNING: Unable to open /proc/cpuinfo\n");
next reply other threads:[~2019-08-19 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-19 9:42 Jim Harris [this message]
2019-08-19 17:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=156620773023.46233.9134599999619749565.stgit@jrharri1-skx \
--to=james.r.harris@intel.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).