From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com (mail-wg0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663DB3208
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 11:55:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wghk14 with SMTP id k14so19380910wgh.4
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 02:55:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=m836+FYnE/vRHCNHOnRO8RlhRrslhxq1Atjhnp4AjJE=;
 b=KSUWl3w6r/7feSoFWCOhO0Y6A0PcLN/cLJTR/qOriiJP0nFAuzGizriz0g4aX+owVt
 L1ewOV50O3P9V9P8OI+7v6nQfZNqwuCBO1g3FQKYswrZXZkxLWTDZW1EXPLB9PTr+M5y
 p32teyHYw/Wr920vggW2ECv15segc/ljlMdnVmvzLV/BGTmCwJs3ihI9JOcBeiUAZ66a
 hxiwyT0hQizSI8qXOeuKOSuEkvuZ9yWLTzJQjMji0WPIG5pgGgrrpTwn+/Ks0MBNhvz5
 q0RpCkJYaBMO2r6Mqo2ZySCUjDU4XYdpgZLCTKtHhMdJc+2PrgSGWL/zfhc71iLnG4nh
 bhFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlEs7O94RMACMi0+1oYec4GjoxrYJxEWMul65c42okkryKTmrhc6PHu6u9fE1OUeAptXg4P
X-Received: by 10.194.89.163 with SMTP id bp3mr25707274wjb.145.1425034542182; 
 Fri, 27 Feb 2015 02:55:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gz3sm2297718wib.1.2015.02.27.02.55.39
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Fri, 27 Feb 2015 02:55:40 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: lhffjzh <lhffjzh@126.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 11:55:03 +0100
Message-ID: <1566601.Xkl8jJDb44@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.4 (Linux/3.18.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.4; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <03fb01d05269$fe8d2110$fba76330$@com>
References: <1416936405-25333-1-git-send-email-ssujith@cisco.com>
 <D1162370.313E9%ssujith@cisco.com> <03fb01d05269$fe8d2110$fba76330$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by
	i40e NIC
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:55:42 -0000

2015-02-27 16:47, lhffjzh:
> Hi All,
> 
> We use 4 cores loop 4 rx queues on one i40e port, but only rx queue "0" can
> receive network packet, do anyone kindly know why? BTW, all of network
> packet has same destination ip address but has more than 200 different
> source ip address.

It's possible that you don't have any answer for 2 reasons:
- you replied in a thread dedicated to Cisco enic questions
- you didn't describe your usage enough to understand your problem

I suggest to use the button "new email" instead of "reply all" to
start a new question with enough details.

Did you noticed you put some Cisco guys in CC instead of putting the
Intel responsible for i40e (see MAINTAINERS file)?