DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: nd@arm.com, thomas@monjalon.net, jerinj@marvell.com,
	stephen@networkplumber.org, mb@smartsharesystems.com,
	david.marchand@redhat.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com,
	gavin.hu@arm.com, ravi1.kumar@amd.com, rmody@marvell.com,
	shshaikh@marvell.com, xuanziyang2@huawei.com,
	cloud.wangxiaoyun@huawei.com, zhouguoyang@huawei.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] test/bitops: add bit operation test case
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 18:06:55 +0800
Message-ID: <1574071619-10407-3-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1571125801-45773-1-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com>

Add test cases for set bit, clear bit, test and set bit,
test and clear bit operations.

Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
---
 app/test/Makefile         |   1 +
 app/test/autotest_data.py |   6 +
 app/test/meson.build      |   2 +
 app/test/test_bitops.c    | 303 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 312 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 app/test/test_bitops.c

diff --git a/app/test/Makefile b/app/test/Makefile
index 57930c00b..4f3327492 100644
--- a/app/test/Makefile
+++ b/app/test/Makefile
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ SRCS-y += test_ticketlock.c
 SRCS-y += test_memory.c
 SRCS-y += test_memzone.c
 SRCS-y += test_bitmap.c
+SRCS-y += test_bitops.c
 SRCS-y += test_reciprocal_division.c
 SRCS-y += test_reciprocal_division_perf.c
 SRCS-y += test_fbarray.c
diff --git a/app/test/autotest_data.py b/app/test/autotest_data.py
index 6deb97bcc..e06344087 100644
--- a/app/test/autotest_data.py
+++ b/app/test/autotest_data.py
@@ -404,6 +404,12 @@
         "Func":    default_autotest,
         "Report":  None,
     },
+    {
+        "Name":    "Bitops autotest",
+        "Command": "bitops_autotest",
+        "Func":    default_autotest,
+        "Report":  None,
+    },
     {
         "Name":    "Hash multiwriter autotest",
         "Command": "hash_multiwriter_autotest",
diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build
index ff59c3131..33b41353c 100644
--- a/app/test/meson.build
+++ b/app/test/meson.build
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ test_sources = files('commands.c',
 	'test_atomic.c',
 	'test_barrier.c',
 	'test_bitratestats.c',
+	'test_bitops.c',
 	'test_bpf.c',
 	'test_byteorder.c',
 	'test_cmdline.c',
@@ -167,6 +168,7 @@ fast_test_names = [
         'alarm_autotest',
         'atomic_autotest',
         'byteorder_autotest',
+        'bitops_autotest',
         'cmdline_autotest',
         'common_autotest',
         'cpuflags_autotest',
diff --git a/app/test/test_bitops.c b/app/test/test_bitops.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9d0ac0299
--- /dev/null
+++ b/app/test/test_bitops.c
@@ -0,0 +1,303 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright(c) 2019 Arm Limited
+ */
+
+#include <rte_bitops.h>
+#include <rte_launch.h>
+#include "test.h"
+
+unsigned long val32 = 1UL << 10;
+unsigned long val64 = 1UL << 33;
+unsigned int synchro;
+unsigned int count32;
+unsigned int count64;
+
+#define MAX_BITS_32 32
+#define MAX_BITS_64 64
+/*
+ * Bitops functions
+ * ================
+ *
+ * - The main test function performs several subtests.
+ * - For relaxed version, check bit operations on one core.
+ *   - Initialize valXX to specified values, then set each bit of valXX
+ *     to 1 one by one in "test_bitops_set_relaxed".
+ *
+ *   - Clear each bit of valXX to 0 one by one in "test_bitops_clear_relaxed".
+ *
+ *   - Function "test_bitops_test_set_clear_relaxed" checks whether each bit
+ *     of valXX can do "test and set" and "test and clear" correctly.
+ *
+ * - For C11 atomic barrier version, check bit operations on multi cores.
+ *   - Per bit of valXX is set to 1, then cleared to 0 on each core in
+ *     "test_bitops_set_clear". The function checks that once all lcores finish
+ *     their set_clear, the value of valXX would still be zero.
+ *
+ *   - The cores are waiting for a synchro which is triggered by the main test
+ *     function. Then all cores would do "rte_test_and_set_bitXX" or
+ *     "rte_test_and_clear_bitXX" at the same time, "countXX" which is checked
+ *     as the result later would inc by one or not according to the original
+ *     bit value.
+ *
+ */
+
+static int
+test_bitops_set_relaxed(void)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+		rte_set_bit32_relaxed(i, &val32);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+		if (!rte_get_bit32_relaxed(i, &val32)) {
+			printf("Failed to set bit in relaxed version.\n");
+			return TEST_FAILED;
+		}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+		rte_set_bit64_relaxed(i, &val64);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+		if (!rte_get_bit64_relaxed(i, &val64)) {
+			printf("Failed to set bit in relaxed version.\n");
+			return TEST_FAILED;
+		}
+
+	return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+test_bitops_clear_relaxed(void)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+		rte_clear_bit32_relaxed(i, &val32);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+		if (rte_get_bit32_relaxed(i, &val32)) {
+			printf("Failed to clear bit in relaxed version.\n");
+			return TEST_FAILED;
+		}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+		rte_clear_bit64_relaxed(i, &val64);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+		if (rte_get_bit64_relaxed(i, &val64)) {
+			printf("Failed to clear bit in relaxed version.\n");
+			return TEST_FAILED;
+		}
+
+	return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+test_bitops_test_set_clear_relaxed(void)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+		rte_test_and_set_bit32_relaxed(i, &val32);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+		if (!rte_test_and_clear_bit32_relaxed(i, &val32)) {
+			printf("Failed to set and test bit in relaxed version.\n");
+			return TEST_FAILED;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+		if (rte_get_bit32_relaxed(i, &val32)) {
+			printf("Failed to test and clear bit in relaxed version.\n");
+			return TEST_FAILED;
+		}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+		rte_test_and_set_bit64_relaxed(i, &val64);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+		if (!rte_test_and_clear_bit64_relaxed(i, &val64)) {
+			printf("Failed to set and test bit in relaxed version.\n");
+			return TEST_FAILED;
+		}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+		if (rte_get_bit64_relaxed(i, &val64)) {
+			printf("Failed to test and clear bit in relaxed version.\n");
+			return TEST_FAILED;
+		}
+
+	return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+test_bitops_set_clear(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
+{
+	while (__atomic_load_n(&synchro, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) == 0)
+		;
+
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+		rte_set_bit32(i, &val32);
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+		rte_clear_bit32(i, &val32);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+		rte_set_bit64(i, &val64);
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+		rte_clear_bit64(i, &val64);
+
+	return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+/*
+ * rte_test_and_set_bitXX() returns the original bit value, then set it to 1.
+ * This functions checks that if the target bit is equal to 0, set it to 1 and
+ * increase the variable of "countXX" by one. If it is equal to 1, do nothing
+ * for "countXX". The value of "countXX" would be checked as the result later.
+ */
+static int
+test_bitops_test_set(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
+
+{
+	while (__atomic_load_n(&synchro, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) == 0)
+		;
+
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+		if (!rte_test_and_set_bit32(i, &val32))
+			__atomic_fetch_add(&count32, 1, __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+		if (!rte_test_and_set_bit64(i, &val64))
+			__atomic_fetch_add(&count64, 1, __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL);
+
+	return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+/*
+ * rte_test_and_set_bitXX() returns the original bit value, then clear it to 0.
+ * This functions checks that if the target bit is equal to 1, clear it to 0 and
+ * increase the variable of "countXX" by one. If it is equal to 0, do nothing
+ * for "countXX". The value of "countXX" would be checked as the result later.
+ */
+static int
+test_bitops_test_clear(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
+
+{
+	while (__atomic_load_n(&synchro, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) == 0)
+		;
+
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+		if (rte_test_and_clear_bit32(i, &val32))
+			__atomic_fetch_add(&count32, 1, __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+		if (rte_test_and_clear_bit64(i, &val64))
+			__atomic_fetch_add(&count64, 1, __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL);
+
+	return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+test_bitops(void)
+{
+	 __atomic_store_n(&synchro, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+	 __atomic_store_n(&count32, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+	 __atomic_store_n(&count64, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+
+	if (test_bitops_set_relaxed() < 0)
+		return TEST_FAILED;
+
+	if (test_bitops_clear_relaxed() < 0)
+		return TEST_FAILED;
+
+	if (test_bitops_test_set_clear_relaxed() < 0)
+		return TEST_FAILED;
+
+
+	rte_eal_mp_remote_launch(test_bitops_set_clear, NULL, SKIP_MASTER);
+	__atomic_store_n(&synchro, 1,  __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+	rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
+	__atomic_store_n(&synchro, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+		if (rte_get_bit32(i, &val32)) {
+			printf("Failed to set and clear bit on multi cores.\n");
+			return TEST_FAILED;
+		}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+		if (rte_get_bit64(i, &val64)) {
+			printf("Failed to set and clear bit on multi cores.\n");
+			return TEST_FAILED;
+		}
+
+	/*
+	 * Launch all slave lcores to do "rte_bitops_test_and_set_bitXX"
+	 * respectively.
+	 * Each lcore should have MAX_BITS_XX chances to check the target bit.
+	 * If it's equal to 0, set it to 1 and "countXX (which is initialized
+	 * to 0)" would be increased by one. If the target bit is 1, still set
+	 * it to 1 and do nothing for "countXX". There would be only one lcore
+	 * that finds the target bit is 0.
+	 * If the final value of "countXX" is equal to MAX_BITS_XX, all slave
+	 * lcores performed "rte_bitops_test_and_set_bitXX" correctly.
+	 */
+	__atomic_store_n(&count32, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+	__atomic_store_n(&count64, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+
+	rte_eal_mp_remote_launch(test_bitops_test_set, NULL, SKIP_MASTER);
+	__atomic_store_n(&synchro, 1,  __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+	rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
+	__atomic_store_n(&synchro, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+
+	if (__atomic_load_n(&count32, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) != MAX_BITS_32) {
+		printf("Failed to test and set on multi cores.\n");
+		return TEST_FAILED;
+	}
+	if (__atomic_load_n(&count64, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) != MAX_BITS_64) {
+		printf("Failed to test and set on multi cores.\n");
+		return TEST_FAILED;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Launch all slave lcores to do "rte_bitops_test_and_clear_bitXX"
+	 * respectively.
+	 * Each lcore should have MAX_BITS_XX chances to check the target bit.
+	 * If it's equal to 1, clear it to 0 and "countXX (which is initialized
+	 * to 0)" would be increased by one. If the target bit is 0, still clear
+	 * it to 0 and do nothing for "countXX". There would be only one lcore
+	 * that finds the target bit is 1.
+	 * If the final value of "countXX" is equal to MAX_BITS_XX, all slave
+	 * lcores performed "rte_bitops_test_and_clear_bitXX" correctly.
+	 */
+
+	__atomic_store_n(&count32, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+	__atomic_store_n(&count64, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+
+	rte_eal_mp_remote_launch(test_bitops_test_clear, NULL, SKIP_MASTER);
+	__atomic_store_n(&synchro, 1,  __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+	rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
+	__atomic_store_n(&synchro, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+
+	if (__atomic_load_n(&count32, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) != MAX_BITS_32) {
+		printf("Failed to test and clear on multi cores.\n");
+		return TEST_FAILED;
+	}
+	if (__atomic_load_n(&count64, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) != MAX_BITS_64) {
+		printf("Failed to test and clear on multi cores.\n");
+		return TEST_FAILED;
+	}
+
+	return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(bitops_autotest, test_bitops);
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply index

Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-15  7:49 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/5] implement common rte bit operation APIs in PMDs Joyce Kong
2019-10-15  7:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/5] lib/eal: implement the family of rte bit operation APIs Joyce Kong
2019-10-15 16:53   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-18  9:00     ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-16  7:54   ` Jerin Jacob
2019-10-18  9:02     ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-23  3:12       ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-16 19:05   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-17 13:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/5] lib/eal: implement the family of rte bitoperation APIs Morten Brørup
2019-10-18  8:58     ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-23  3:07       ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-23  7:45         ` Morten Brørup
2019-10-23 17:30           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-24  3:38             ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-11-01 13:48               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-11-03 15:45                 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-15  7:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/5] net/axgbe: use common rte bit operation APIs instead Joyce Kong
2019-10-15  7:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/5] net/bnx2x: " Joyce Kong
2019-10-15  7:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 4/5] net/hinic: " Joyce Kong
2019-10-15  7:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 5/5] net/qede: " Joyce Kong
2019-10-15 16:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/5] implement common rte bit operation APIs in PMDs Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-18  9:01   ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-23  2:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] " Joyce Kong
2019-10-25 13:14   ` David Marchand
2019-10-29 16:42   ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-10-30  9:55     ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-30 10:17       ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-10-30 12:32       ` Jerin Jacob
2019-10-30 13:02         ` Morten Brørup
2019-10-31 10:39           ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-23  2:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of rte bit operation APIs Joyce Kong
2019-10-23  3:09   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-23  4:56   ` Jerin Jacob
2019-10-23  7:46   ` Morten Brørup
2019-10-23  2:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] test/iobitops: add io bit operation test case Joyce Kong
2019-10-23  2:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] net/axgbe: use common rte bit operation APIs instead Joyce Kong
2019-10-23  3:16   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-23  2:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] net/bnx2x: " Joyce Kong
2019-10-23  2:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] net/hinic: " Joyce Kong
2019-10-23  2:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] net/qede: " Joyce Kong
2019-11-18 10:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] implement common rte bit operation APIs in PMDs Joyce Kong
2019-11-18 10:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of rte bit operation APIs Joyce Kong
2019-11-18 10:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of rte bitoperation APIs Morten Brørup
2019-11-19  9:22     ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-11-18 10:06 ` Joyce Kong [this message]
2019-11-18 10:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/6] net/axgbe: use common rte bit operation APIs instead Joyce Kong
2019-11-18 10:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/6] net/bnx2x: " Joyce Kong
2019-11-18 10:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/6] net/qede: " Joyce Kong
2019-11-18 10:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] net/hinic: " Joyce Kong
2019-11-20 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/6] implement common rte bit operation APIs in PMDs Joyce Kong
2019-11-20 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of rte bit operation APIs Joyce Kong
2019-11-20 13:40   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of rte bitoperation APIs Morten Brørup
2019-11-20 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/6] test/bitops: add bit operation test case Joyce Kong
2019-11-20 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/6] net/axgbe: use common rte bit operation APIs instead Joyce Kong
2019-11-20 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/6] net/bnx2x: " Joyce Kong
2019-11-20 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/6] net/qede: " Joyce Kong
2019-11-20 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/6] net/hinic: " Joyce Kong
2019-11-28  6:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/6] implement common rte bit operation APIs in PMDs Joyce Kong
2019-11-28  6:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of rte bit operation APIs Joyce Kong
2019-11-28  6:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/6] test/bitops: add bit operation test case Joyce Kong
2019-11-28  6:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/6] net/axgbe: use common rte bit operation APIs instead Joyce Kong
2019-12-02  6:09   ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-12-02  9:12     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-12-02  9:24       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/6] net/axgbe: use common rte bitoperation " Morten Brørup
2019-12-02  9:30         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-12-02 16:53         ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-12-03  6:52           ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-11-28  6:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/6] net/bnx2x: use common rte bit operation " Joyce Kong
2019-11-28  6:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/6] net/qede: " Joyce Kong
2019-11-28  6:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/6] net/hinic: " Joyce Kong
2019-12-18  6:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/6] implement common rte bit operation APIs in PMDs Joyce Kong
2019-12-18  6:55   ` Gavin Hu
2020-01-17 13:03   ` David Marchand
2019-12-18  6:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of rte bit operation APIs Joyce Kong
2019-12-20  6:52   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-12-21 16:07     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-12-21 18:07       ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-12-23  5:04         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-12-23 16:36           ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-12-30  3:02             ` Gavin Hu
2020-01-07  0:44               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-01-07  1:26                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-01-07  4:41                   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-01-07  0:41             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-12-21 18:08       ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-12-23  5:45         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-12-23  8:59       ` Jerin Jacob
2019-12-18  6:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/6] test/bitops: add bit operation test case Joyce Kong
2019-12-18  6:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/6] net/axgbe: use common rte bit operation APIs instead Joyce Kong
2019-12-18  6:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/6] net/bnx2x: " Joyce Kong
2019-12-18  6:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/6] net/qede: " Joyce Kong
2019-12-18  6:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/6] net/hinic: " Joyce Kong
2020-03-09  9:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/6] implement common rte bit operation APIs in PMDs Joyce Kong
2020-03-09  9:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of PMD bit operation APIs Joyce Kong
2020-03-09 15:50   ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-03-31 22:35   ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-01  8:27     ` Gavin Hu
2020-04-01  9:45       ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-02  7:20         ` Gavin Hu
2020-04-02  8:07           ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-02  8:11             ` Jerin Jacob
2020-04-02  9:02               ` Gavin Hu
2020-03-09  9:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/6] test/pmdbitops: add PMD bit operation test case Joyce Kong
2020-03-09  9:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/6] net/axgbe: use common rte bit operation APIs instead Joyce Kong
2020-03-09  9:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/6] net/bnx2x: " Joyce Kong
2020-03-09  9:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/6] net/qede: " Joyce Kong
2020-03-09  9:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 6/6] net/hinic: " Joyce Kong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1574071619-10407-3-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com \
    --to=joyce.kong@arm.com \
    --cc=cloud.wangxiaoyun@huawei.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gavin.hu@arm.com \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=ravi1.kumar@amd.com \
    --cc=rmody@marvell.com \
    --cc=shshaikh@marvell.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=xuanziyang2@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhouguoyang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox