DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: david.marchand@6wind.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, viktorin@rehivetech.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] clean-up cpuflags
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:30:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1580070.N1sbRJvuMl@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454797033-24057-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>

2016-02-06 23:17, Thomas Monjalon:
> Following the work of Ferruh, I suggest this cleanup to remove as much
> as possible of the code from the cpuflags headers.
> The goal is to un-inline these functions (not performance sensitive)
> and remove the CPU flags table from the ABI (just added recently).
> The bonus is to stop mimic x86 in ARM and PPC implementations.
> 
> WARNING: it has not been tested nor compiled on Tilera and POWER8.
> 
> v2 changes:
> - fix maintainers file
> - fix include from C++ app
> - fix missing REG_PLATFORM for ARM
> - suggested ARM refactor from Jerin

Applied

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-16  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-02 22:59 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 " Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-02 22:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/5] eal: get CPU flag name Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-02 23:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/5] eal: move CPU flag functions out of headers Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-02 23:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/5] eal/arm: adapt CPU flags check to the arch Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-02 23:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 4/5] eal/ppc: " Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-02 23:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 5/5] eal: remove compiler optimization workaround Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-02 23:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/5] clean-up cpuflags Jan Viktorin
2016-02-03 13:38 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-02-03 14:01   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-03 15:36     ` Jerin Jacob
2016-02-06 22:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-06 22:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] eal: get CPU flag name Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-06 22:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] eal: move CPU flag functions out of headers Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-08  8:59     ` Jerin Jacob
2016-02-06 22:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] eal/arm: adapt CPU flags check to the arch Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-08  9:00     ` Jerin Jacob
2016-02-06 22:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] eal/ppc: " Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-06 22:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] eal: remove compiler optimization workaround Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-16  7:30   ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1580070.N1sbRJvuMl@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=viktorin@rehivetech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).