* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] fixes for tap
@ 2020-03-19 13:11 wangyunjian
2020-03-19 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/tap: fix mbuf double free when write fails wangyunjian
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: wangyunjian @ 2020-03-19 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: keith.wiles, jerry.lilijun, xudingke, Yunjian Wang
From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
This series include three fixes patches for tap PMD driver.
Yunjian Wang (3):
net/tap: fix mbuf double free when writev fails
net/tap: fix mbuf and mem leak during queue release
net/tap: fix check for mbuf's nb_segs failure
drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
2.19.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/tap: fix mbuf double free when write fails
2020-03-19 13:11 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] fixes for tap wangyunjian
@ 2020-03-19 13:11 ` wangyunjian
2020-03-19 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/tap: fix mbuf and mem leak during queue release wangyunjian
2020-03-19 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/tap: fix check for mbuf's nb_segs failure wangyunjian
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: wangyunjian @ 2020-03-19 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: keith.wiles, jerry.lilijun, xudingke, Yunjian Wang, stable
From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
When the tap_write_mbufs() function return with break, mbuf was freed
without incrementing num_packets. This may lead applications also free
the mbuf. And the pmd_tx_burst() function should returns the number of
original packets it actually sent excluding tso mbufs.
Fixes: 9396ad334672 ("net/tap: fix reported number of Tx packets")
CC: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
---
drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
index 05470a211..4c4b6b0b2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ tap_tx_l3_cksum(char *packet, uint64_t ol_flags, unsigned int l2_len,
}
}
-static inline void
+static inline int
tap_write_mbufs(struct tx_queue *txq, uint16_t num_mbufs,
struct rte_mbuf **pmbufs,
uint16_t *num_packets, unsigned long *num_tx_bytes)
@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ tap_write_mbufs(struct tx_queue *txq, uint16_t num_mbufs,
seg_len = rte_pktmbuf_data_len(mbuf);
l234_hlen = mbuf->l2_len + mbuf->l3_len + mbuf->l4_len;
if (seg_len < l234_hlen)
- break;
+ return -1;
/* To change checksums, work on a * copy of l2, l3
* headers + l4 pseudo header
@@ -634,10 +634,12 @@ tap_write_mbufs(struct tx_queue *txq, uint16_t num_mbufs,
/* copy the tx frame data */
n = writev(process_private->txq_fds[txq->queue_id], iovecs, j);
if (n <= 0)
- break;
+ return -1;
+
(*num_packets)++;
(*num_tx_bytes) += rte_pktmbuf_pkt_len(mbuf);
}
+ return 0;
}
/* Callback to handle sending packets from the tap interface
@@ -708,8 +710,15 @@ pmd_tx_burst(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
num_mbufs = 1;
}
- tap_write_mbufs(txq, num_mbufs, mbuf,
- &num_packets, &num_tx_bytes);
+ ret = tap_write_mbufs(txq, num_mbufs, mbuf,
+ &num_packets, &num_tx_bytes);
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ txq->stats.errs++;
+ /* free tso mbufs */
+ for (j = 0; j < ret; j++)
+ rte_pktmbuf_free(mbuf[j]);
+ break;
+ }
num_tx++;
/* free original mbuf */
rte_pktmbuf_free(mbuf_in);
@@ -722,7 +731,7 @@ pmd_tx_burst(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
txq->stats.errs += nb_pkts - num_tx;
txq->stats.obytes += num_tx_bytes;
- return num_packets;
+ return num_tx;
}
static const char *
--
2.19.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/tap: fix mbuf and mem leak during queue release
2020-03-19 13:11 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] fixes for tap wangyunjian
2020-03-19 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/tap: fix mbuf double free when write fails wangyunjian
@ 2020-03-19 13:11 ` wangyunjian
2020-03-19 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/tap: fix check for mbuf's nb_segs failure wangyunjian
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: wangyunjian @ 2020-03-19 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: keith.wiles, jerry.lilijun, xudingke, Yunjian Wang, stable
From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
For the tap PMD, we should release mbufs and iovecs from the Rx queue
when close or remove device.
Fixes: 0781f5762cfe ("net/tap: support segmented mbufs")
CC: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
---
drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
index 4c4b6b0b2..a9ba0ca68 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
@@ -1022,6 +1022,7 @@ tap_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
int i;
struct pmd_internals *internals = dev->data->dev_private;
struct pmd_process_private *process_private = dev->process_private;
+ struct rx_queue *rxq;
tap_link_set_down(dev);
tap_flow_flush(dev, NULL);
@@ -1029,8 +1030,13 @@ tap_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
for (i = 0; i < RTE_PMD_TAP_MAX_QUEUES; i++) {
if (process_private->rxq_fds[i] != -1) {
+ rxq = &internals->rxq[i];
close(process_private->rxq_fds[i]);
process_private->rxq_fds[i] = -1;
+ rte_pktmbuf_free(rxq->pool);
+ rte_free(rxq->iovecs);
+ rxq->pool = NULL;
+ rxq->iovecs = NULL;
}
if (process_private->txq_fds[i] != -1) {
close(process_private->txq_fds[i]);
@@ -2399,6 +2405,7 @@ rte_pmd_tap_remove(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev = NULL;
struct pmd_internals *internals;
struct pmd_process_private *process_private;
+ struct rx_queue *rxq;
int i;
/* find the ethdev entry */
@@ -2425,8 +2432,13 @@ rte_pmd_tap_remove(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
}
for (i = 0; i < RTE_PMD_TAP_MAX_QUEUES; i++) {
if (process_private->rxq_fds[i] != -1) {
+ rxq = &internals->rxq[i];
close(process_private->rxq_fds[i]);
process_private->rxq_fds[i] = -1;
+ rte_pktmbuf_free(rxq->pool);
+ rte_free(rxq->iovecs);
+ rxq->pool = NULL;
+ rxq->iovecs = NULL;
}
if (process_private->txq_fds[i] != -1) {
close(process_private->txq_fds[i]);
--
2.19.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/tap: fix check for mbuf's nb_segs failure
2020-03-19 13:11 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] fixes for tap wangyunjian
2020-03-19 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/tap: fix mbuf double free when write fails wangyunjian
2020-03-19 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/tap: fix mbuf and mem leak during queue release wangyunjian
@ 2020-03-19 13:11 ` wangyunjian
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: wangyunjian @ 2020-03-19 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: keith.wiles, jerry.lilijun, xudingke, Yunjian Wang, stable
From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
Now the rxq->pool is mbuf concatenation, But its nb_segs is 1.
When do some sanity checks on the mbuf, it fails.
Fixes: 0781f5762cfe ("net/tap: support segmented mbufs")
CC: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
---
drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
index a9ba0ca68..717d8b94c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
@@ -339,6 +339,20 @@ tap_rx_offload_get_queue_capa(void)
DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM;
}
+static void
+tap_rxq_pool_free(struct rte_mbuf *pool)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *mbuf = pool;
+ uint16_t nb_segs = 1;
+
+ while (mbuf->next) {
+ mbuf = mbuf->next;
+ nb_segs++;
+ }
+ pool->nb_segs = nb_segs;
+ rte_pktmbuf_free(pool);
+}
+
/* Callback to handle the rx burst of packets to the correct interface and
* file descriptor(s) in a multi-queue setup.
*/
@@ -389,7 +403,7 @@ pmd_rx_burst(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
goto end;
seg->next = NULL;
- rte_pktmbuf_free(mbuf);
+ tap_rxq_pool_free(mbuf);
goto end;
}
@@ -1033,7 +1047,7 @@ tap_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
rxq = &internals->rxq[i];
close(process_private->rxq_fds[i]);
process_private->rxq_fds[i] = -1;
- rte_pktmbuf_free(rxq->pool);
+ tap_rxq_pool_free(rxq->pool);
rte_free(rxq->iovecs);
rxq->pool = NULL;
rxq->iovecs = NULL;
@@ -1072,7 +1086,7 @@ tap_rx_queue_release(void *queue)
if (process_private->rxq_fds[rxq->queue_id] > 0) {
close(process_private->rxq_fds[rxq->queue_id]);
process_private->rxq_fds[rxq->queue_id] = -1;
- rte_pktmbuf_free(rxq->pool);
+ tap_rxq_pool_free(rxq->pool);
rte_free(rxq->iovecs);
rxq->pool = NULL;
rxq->iovecs = NULL;
@@ -1480,7 +1494,7 @@ tap_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
return 0;
error:
- rte_pktmbuf_free(rxq->pool);
+ tap_rxq_pool_free(rxq->pool);
rxq->pool = NULL;
rte_free(rxq->iovecs);
rxq->iovecs = NULL;
@@ -2435,7 +2449,7 @@ rte_pmd_tap_remove(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
rxq = &internals->rxq[i];
close(process_private->rxq_fds[i]);
process_private->rxq_fds[i] = -1;
- rte_pktmbuf_free(rxq->pool);
+ tap_rxq_pool_free(rxq->pool);
rte_free(rxq->iovecs);
rxq->pool = NULL;
rxq->iovecs = NULL;
--
2.19.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-19 13:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-19 13:11 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] fixes for tap wangyunjian
2020-03-19 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/tap: fix mbuf double free when write fails wangyunjian
2020-03-19 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/tap: fix mbuf and mem leak during queue release wangyunjian
2020-03-19 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/tap: fix check for mbuf's nb_segs failure wangyunjian
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).