From: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
To: jerinj@marvell.com, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, erik.g.carrillo@intel.com,
Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com, Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com, nd@arm.com,
david.marchand@redhat.com, mdr@ashroe.eu, nhorman@tuxdriver.com,
dodji@redhat.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] eventdev: use C11 atomics for lcore timer armed flag
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 23:54:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1594137293-22468-2-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1594137293-22468-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com>
The in_use flag is a per core variable which is not shared between
lcores in the normal case and the access of this variable should be
ordered on the same core. However, if non-EAL thread pick the highest
lcore to insert timers into, there is the possibility of conflicts
on this flag between threads. Then the atomic compare-and-swap
operation is needed.
Use the C11 atomics instead of the generic rte_atomic operations to
avoid the unnecessary barrier on aarch64.
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Acked-by: Erik Gabriel Carrillo <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
---
v4:
1.Change 'CAS' to 'compare-and-swap' to pass the coding style check.
2.Cc to stable release. (Honnappa)
v2:
1. Make the code comments more accurate. (Erik)
2. Define the in_use flag as an unsigned type. (Stephen)
lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c | 15 +++++++++++----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c
index 370ea40..4ed3013 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c
@@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ struct swtim {
uint32_t timer_data_id;
/* Track which cores have actually armed a timer */
struct {
- rte_atomic16_t v;
+ uint16_t v;
} __rte_cache_aligned in_use[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
/* Track which cores' timer lists should be polled */
unsigned int poll_lcores[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
@@ -606,7 +606,8 @@ swtim_callback(struct rte_timer *tim)
"with immediate expiry value");
}
- if (unlikely(rte_atomic16_test_and_set(&sw->in_use[lcore].v))) {
+ if (unlikely(sw->in_use[lcore].v == 0)) {
+ sw->in_use[lcore].v = 1;
n_lcores = __atomic_fetch_add(&sw->n_poll_lcores, 1,
__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
__atomic_store_n(&sw->poll_lcores[n_lcores], lcore,
@@ -834,7 +835,7 @@ swtim_init(struct rte_event_timer_adapter *adapter)
/* Initialize the variables that track in-use timer lists */
for (i = 0; i < RTE_MAX_LCORE; i++)
- rte_atomic16_init(&sw->in_use[i].v);
+ sw->in_use[i].v = 0;
/* Initialize the timer subsystem and allocate timer data instance */
ret = rte_timer_subsystem_init();
@@ -1017,6 +1018,8 @@ __swtim_arm_burst(const struct rte_event_timer_adapter *adapter,
struct rte_timer *tim, *tims[nb_evtims];
uint64_t cycles;
int n_lcores;
+ /* Timer list for this lcore is not in use. */
+ uint16_t exp_state = 0;
#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_EVENTDEV_DEBUG
/* Check that the service is running. */
@@ -1035,8 +1038,12 @@ __swtim_arm_burst(const struct rte_event_timer_adapter *adapter,
/* If this is the first time we're arming an event timer on this lcore,
* mark this lcore as "in use"; this will cause the service
* function to process the timer list that corresponds to this lcore.
+ * The atomic compare-and-swap operation can prevent the race condition
+ * on in_use flag between multiple non-EAL threads.
*/
- if (unlikely(rte_atomic16_test_and_set(&sw->in_use[lcore_id].v))) {
+ if (unlikely(__atomic_compare_exchange_n(&sw->in_use[lcore_id].v,
+ &exp_state, 1, 0,
+ __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED))) {
EVTIM_LOG_DBG("Adding lcore id = %u to list of lcores to poll",
lcore_id);
n_lcores = __atomic_fetch_add(&sw->n_poll_lcores, 1,
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-07 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-12 11:19 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eventdev: fix race condition on timer list counter Phil Yang
2020-06-12 11:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] eventdev: use c11 atomics for lcore timer armed flag Phil Yang
2020-06-23 21:01 ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-06-28 16:12 ` Phil Yang
2020-06-23 21:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-06-23 21:31 ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-06-28 16:32 ` Phil Yang
2020-06-12 11:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] eventdev: relax smp barriers with c11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-06-22 10:12 ` Phil Yang
2020-06-23 19:38 ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-06-28 17:33 ` Phil Yang
2020-06-29 18:07 ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-06-18 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eventdev: fix race condition on timer list counter Carrillo, Erik G
2020-06-18 18:25 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-22 9:48 ` Phil Yang
2020-07-01 11:22 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-07-02 3:28 ` Phil Yang
2020-07-02 3:26 ` Phil Yang
2020-07-02 3:56 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-02 21:15 ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-07-02 21:30 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-22 9:09 ` Phil Yang
2020-07-02 5:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] " Phil Yang
2020-07-02 5:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] eventdev: use c11 atomics for lcore timer armed flag Phil Yang
2020-07-02 20:21 ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-07-02 5:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] eventdev: remove redundant code Phil Yang
2020-07-03 3:35 ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-07-02 5:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] eventdev: relax smp barriers with c11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-07-02 20:30 ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-07-03 10:50 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-07-06 10:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-06 15:32 ` Phil Yang
2020-07-06 15:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-07 11:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] eventdev: fix race condition on timer list counter Phil Yang
2020-07-07 11:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] eventdev: use C11 atomics for lcore timer armed flag Phil Yang
2020-07-07 11:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] eventdev: remove redundant code Phil Yang
2020-07-07 11:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] eventdev: relax smp barriers with C11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-07-07 14:29 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-07-07 15:56 ` Phil Yang
2020-07-07 15:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] eventdev: fix race condition on timer list counter Phil Yang
2020-07-07 15:54 ` Phil Yang [this message]
2020-07-07 15:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] eventdev: remove redundant code Phil Yang
2020-07-07 15:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] eventdev: relax smp barriers with C11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-07-08 13:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] eventdev: fix race condition on timer list counter Jerin Jacob
2020-07-08 15:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1594137293-22468-2-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com \
--to=phil.yang@arm.com \
--cc=Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dodji@redhat.com \
--cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=erik.g.carrillo@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).