From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4494C7CE5 for ; Fri, 5 May 2017 00:04:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87102205D1; Thu, 4 May 2017 18:04:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 May 2017 18:04:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=Y2ANo/S3dbvNFyI Icb3rcnKuHFDsmZMjk8/zGC/fgWU=; b=HnuJpkwZ5LlmuA1y8agtFOx52/8QKDj 9yDLHxfnx797kiNyn6+A2Vk/9fJk4AKT7DZz9OlCg62zmQa7aQ/SbpjZ9q5LPbJe cREoOvwzx4cB0tRsbXAaehG9oUM0eUvBdMj3hc74ijlQ+Vjv1YdUFwJDrHCqi/tH 0AJip90amHu0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=Y2ANo/S3dbvNFyIIcb3rcnKuHFDsmZMjk8/zGC/fgWU=; b=g+i+XW40 CkreaKj6rMZlvsykNKIKP3SVYkDEo3wNdlAtfpdNBOXYWt5Gps402RODdAh5KbEZ N3wfbaDr2BRr5SD/9vgWYPF1/fRPyXHoekQnYROZnhWr0UexakriZcT3+O8X0sV2 3OZ1jCOOaPuOf/aQTyilPdBq8uH1fJz2cBGmbVS0/ERyf+/5nGvMuDVBqiZev90G I+ACYf9Efl9QrXBlsY4H76DDIWaI2kafVM3B0VP45TQkNo2cHcr7HMTKJPeTYYB6 1zM9PTT+UdjAP5+C1ctSxo7mbJ5e3swAMoHApGUjdPqjZngfrM9gBkmXCNjlM7IW 2PvHtp+BI0UAjw== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: 1Dgr9KFgqB6jR+f9U+96oLui36a2++RzZry2tiltiShq 1493935463 Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 41995240A5; Thu, 4 May 2017 18:04:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Joao Martins , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , "Tan, Jianfeng" Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , dev@dpdk.org, Xen-devel Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 00:04:22 +0200 Message-ID: <1596758.olymjc7Tvq@xps> In-Reply-To: <4346357.L5KG7J6tvv@xps13> References: <1478504326-68105-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com> <58AB0C46.5020601@oracle.com> <4346357.L5KG7J6tvv@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 22:04:24 -0000 Ping The Xen dom0 support in DPDK seems dead. Reminder: Last time we talked about, it was because of a severe bug which is not fixed yet: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044207.html http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044376.html The request (9 months ago) was to give more time for feedbacks: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044847.html 23/02/2017 09:49, Thomas Monjalon: > 2017-02-20 15:33, Joao Martins: > > On 02/17/2017 04:07 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:51:44PM +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote: > > >> Le 16/02/2017 =E0 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a =E9crit : > > >>>> Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support? > > >>> So we do have an prototype implementation of netback but it is wait= ing > > >>> for review of xen-devel to the spec. > > >>> > > >>> And I believe the implementation does utilize some of the dom0 > > >>> parts of code in DPDK. > > >> > > >> Please, do you have URLs/pointers about it? It would be interesting = to share > > >> it with DPDK community too. > > >=20 > > > Joao, would it be possible to include an tarball of the patches? I kn= ow > > > they are no in the right state with the review of the staging > > > grants API - they are incompatible, but it may help folks to get > > > a feel for what DPDK APIs you used? > > OK, see attached - I should note that its a WIP as Konrad noted, but on= ce the > > staging grants work is finished, the code would be improved to have it = in better > > shape (as well as in feature parity) for a proper RFC [and adhering to = the > > project coding style]. >=20 > Excuse my ignorance on Xen. > Is xen-netback for Dom0? > Is the DPDK Dom0 support working and useful?