[PATCH v1 0/3] bbdev: new k0 parameter

[PATCH v1 0/3] bbdev: new k0 parameter

[Nicolas Chautru]

Hi Maxime, Hemant, 

Capturing below an extension for 24.11.
This includes bbdev api change and related change for
test application and acc/vrb PMD.
This provides the ability which was introduced in 3gPP
standard to have an alternate way to compute k0 no longer
always computed just from rv_index. When that parameter
is set, then it is used a k0 value (starting position
in circular index), if null the legacy computation
from rv index (more common) is maintained.

Nicolas Chautru (3):
  bbdev: new k0 parameter for LDPC decoder operation
  test/bbdev: add support for k0 parameter
  baseband/acc: add support for k0 parameter

 app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c      | 7 +++++--
 app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c    | 4 ++++
 app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.h    | 1 +
 doc/guides/prog_guide/bbdev.rst       | 2 ++
 drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h     | 6 ++++--
 drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 2 +-
 drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c    | 4 ++--
 lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev_op.h              | 4 ++++
 8 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH v1 1/3] bbdev: new k0 parameter for LDPC decoder operation

[Nicolas Chautru]

In latest 3GPP 38.212, the k0 value is not necessaraly directly
derived from rv_index, in that case a value can be provided in
API. When this value is non null this would override the value
which would be computed purely from rv_index.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
---
 doc/guides/prog_guide/bbdev.rst | 2 ++
 lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev_op.h        | 4 ++++
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/bbdev.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/bbdev.rst
index 09e5f0d990..e3f356450b 100644
--- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/bbdev.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/bbdev.rst
@@ -1021,6 +1021,8 @@ The LDPC decode parameters are set out in the table below.
 +----------------+------------+-------------------------------------------------------+
 |                |eb          |Eb, length of the RM output sequence in bits  r >= cab |
 +----------------+------------+-------------------------------------------------------+
+|                |k0          |Optional k0 Rate matching starting position override   |
++----------------+------------+-------------------------------------------------------+
 
 The mbuf input ``input`` encoded CB data is mandatory for all BBDEV PMDs
 and is the Virtual Circular Buffer data stream with null padding.
diff --git a/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev_op.h b/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev_op.h
index 459631d0d0..b5dde116ab 100644
--- a/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev_op.h
+++ b/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev_op.h
@@ -562,6 +562,10 @@ struct rte_bbdev_op_ldpc_dec {
 		/** Struct which stores Transport Block specific parameters */
 		struct rte_bbdev_op_dec_ldpc_tb_params tb_params;
 	};
+	/** Optional k0 Rate matching starting position, overrides rv_index when non null
+	 *  [3GPP TS38.212, section 5.4.2.1]
+	 */
+	uint16_t k0;
 };
 /* >8 End of structure rte_bbdev_op_ldpc_dec. */
 
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH v1 2/3] test/bbdev: add support for k0 parameter

[Nicolas Chautru]

New k0 added in LDPC decoder structure can be parsed
by the bbdev test application.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
---
 app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c   | 7 +++++--
 app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c | 4 ++++
 app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.h | 1 +
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
index 3a94f15a30..67c55605fd 100644
--- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
+++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
@@ -1923,6 +1923,7 @@ copy_reference_ldpc_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ops, unsigned int n,
 		ops[i]->ldpc_dec.n_cb = ldpc_dec->n_cb;
 		ops[i]->ldpc_dec.iter_max = ldpc_dec->iter_max;
 		ops[i]->ldpc_dec.rv_index = ldpc_dec->rv_index;
+		ops[i]->ldpc_dec.k0 = ldpc_dec->k0;
 		ops[i]->ldpc_dec.op_flags = ldpc_dec->op_flags;
 		ops[i]->ldpc_dec.code_block_mode = ldpc_dec->code_block_mode;
 
@@ -2171,8 +2172,10 @@ validate_op_chain(struct rte_bbdev_op_data *op,
  * As per definition in 3GPP 38.212 Table 5.4.2.1-2
  */
 static inline uint16_t
-get_k0(uint16_t n_cb, uint16_t z_c, uint8_t bg, uint8_t rv_index)
+get_k0(uint16_t n_cb, uint16_t z_c, uint8_t bg, uint8_t rv_index, uint16_t k0)
 {
+	if (k0 > 0)
+		return k0;
 	if (rv_index == 0)
 		return 0;
 	uint16_t n = (bg == 1 ? N_ZC_1 : N_ZC_2) * z_c;
@@ -2202,7 +2205,7 @@ compute_harq_len(struct rte_bbdev_op_ldpc_dec *ops_ld)
 {
 	uint16_t k0 = 0;
 	uint8_t max_rv = (ops_ld->rv_index == 1) ? 3 : ops_ld->rv_index;
-	k0 = get_k0(ops_ld->n_cb, ops_ld->z_c, ops_ld->basegraph, max_rv);
+	k0 = get_k0(ops_ld->n_cb, ops_ld->z_c, ops_ld->basegraph, max_rv, ops_ld->k0);
 	/* Compute RM out size and number of rows */
 	uint16_t parity_offset = (ops_ld->basegraph == 1 ? 20 : 8)
 			* ops_ld->z_c - ops_ld->n_filler;
diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c
index e48947b211..8b32850982 100644
--- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c
+++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c
@@ -865,6 +865,10 @@ parse_ldpc_decoder_params(const char *key_token, char *token,
 		vector->mask |= TEST_BBDEV_VF_RV_INDEX;
 		ldpc_dec->rv_index = (uint8_t) strtoul(token, &err, 0);
 		ret = ((err == NULL) || (*err != '\0')) ? -1 : 0;
+	} else if (!strcmp(key_token, "k0")) {
+		vector->mask |= TEST_BBDEV_VF_K0;
+		ldpc_dec->k0 = (uint16_t) strtoul(token, &err, 0);
+		ret = ((err == NULL) || (*err != '\0')) ? -1 : 0;
 	} else if (!strcmp(key_token, "n_cb")) {
 		vector->mask |= TEST_BBDEV_VF_NCB;
 		ldpc_dec->n_cb = (uint16_t) strtoul(token, &err, 0);
diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.h b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.h
index ba1d0d20f9..9a2942132b 100644
--- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.h
+++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.h
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ enum {
 	TEST_BBDEV_VF_CODE_BLOCK_MODE = (1ULL << 23),
 	TEST_BBDEV_VF_OP_FLAGS = (1ULL << 24),
 	TEST_BBDEV_VF_EXPECTED_STATUS = (1ULL << 25),
+	TEST_BBDEV_VF_K0 = (1ULL << 26),
 };
 
 enum op_data_type {
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH v1 3/3] baseband/acc: add support for k0 parameter

[Nicolas Chautru]

The k0 may be provided to the PMD, which would be used
as the circular buffer starting position instead of value
which would be computed from legacy rv_index derived
computation.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
---
 drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h     | 6 ++++--
 drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 2 +-
 drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c    | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h b/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
index e249f37e38..46b564ce65 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
@@ -982,8 +982,10 @@ acc_fcw_te_fill(const struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op, struct acc_fcw_te *fcw)
  * Starting position of different redundancy versions, k0
  */
 static inline uint16_t
-get_k0(uint16_t n_cb, uint16_t z_c, uint8_t bg, uint8_t rv_index)
+get_k0(uint16_t n_cb, uint16_t z_c, uint8_t bg, uint8_t rv_index, uint16_t k0)
 {
+	if (k0 > 0)
+		return k0;
 	if (rv_index == 0)
 		return 0;
 	uint16_t n = (bg == 1 ? ACC_N_ZC_1 : ACC_N_ZC_2) * z_c;
@@ -1020,7 +1022,7 @@ acc_fcw_le_fill(const struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op,
 	fcw->Zc = op->ldpc_enc.z_c;
 	fcw->ncb = op->ldpc_enc.n_cb;
 	fcw->k0 = get_k0(fcw->ncb, fcw->Zc, op->ldpc_enc.basegraph,
-			op->ldpc_enc.rv_index);
+			op->ldpc_enc.rv_index, 0);
 	fcw->rm_e = (default_e == 0) ? op->ldpc_enc.cb_params.e : default_e;
 	fcw->crc_select = check_bit(op->ldpc_enc.op_flags,
 			RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_CRC_24B_ATTACH);
diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
index ab69350080..7da421e26c 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
@@ -1159,7 +1159,7 @@ acc100_fcw_ld_fill(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_fcw_ld *fcw,
 	fcw->Zc = op->ldpc_dec.z_c;
 	fcw->ncb = op->ldpc_dec.n_cb;
 	fcw->k0 = get_k0(fcw->ncb, fcw->Zc, op->ldpc_dec.basegraph,
-			op->ldpc_dec.rv_index);
+			op->ldpc_dec.rv_index, op->ldpc_dec.k0);
 	if (op->ldpc_dec.code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_CODE_BLOCK)
 		fcw->rm_e = op->ldpc_dec.cb_params.e;
 	else
diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
index 585dc49bd6..ef34fc1c57 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
@@ -1550,7 +1550,7 @@ vrb_fcw_ld_fill(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_fcw_ld *fcw,
 	fcw->Zc = op->ldpc_dec.z_c;
 	fcw->ncb = op->ldpc_dec.n_cb;
 	fcw->k0 = get_k0(fcw->ncb, fcw->Zc, op->ldpc_dec.basegraph,
-			op->ldpc_dec.rv_index);
+			op->ldpc_dec.rv_index, op->ldpc_dec.k0);
 	if (op->ldpc_dec.code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_CODE_BLOCK)
 		fcw->rm_e = op->ldpc_dec.cb_params.e;
 	else
@@ -2274,7 +2274,7 @@ vrb2_fcw_letb_fill(const struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op, struct acc_fcw_le *fcw)
 	fcw->Zc = op->ldpc_enc.z_c;
 	fcw->ncb = op->ldpc_enc.n_cb;
 	fcw->k0 = get_k0(fcw->ncb, fcw->Zc, op->ldpc_enc.basegraph,
-			op->ldpc_enc.rv_index);
+			op->ldpc_enc.rv_index, 0);
 	fcw->rm_e = op->ldpc_enc.tb_params.ea;
 	fcw->rm_e_b = op->ldpc_enc.tb_params.eb;
 	fcw->crc_select = check_bit(op->ldpc_enc.op_flags,
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] bbdev: new k0 parameter

[Hemant Agrawal]

On 02-07-2024 02:57, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> Hi Maxime, Hemant,
>
> Capturing below an extension for 24.11.
> This includes bbdev api change and related change for
> test application and acc/vrb PMD.
> This provides the ability which was introduced in 3gPP
> standard to have an alternate way to compute k0 no longer
> always computed just from rv_index. When that parameter
> is set, then it is used a k0 value (starting position
> in circular index), if null the legacy computation
> from rv index (more common) is maintained.
>
> Nicolas Chautru (3):
>    bbdev: new k0 parameter for LDPC decoder operation
>    test/bbdev: add support for k0 parameter
>    baseband/acc: add support for k0 parameter
>
>   app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c      | 7 +++++--
>   app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c    | 4 ++++
>   app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.h    | 1 +
>   doc/guides/prog_guide/bbdev.rst       | 2 ++
>   drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h     | 6 ++++--
>   drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 2 +-
>   drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c    | 4 ++--
>   lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev_op.h              | 4 ++++
>   8 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

looks ok to me

Series-

Acked-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] bbdev: new k0 parameter for LDPC decoder operation

[Maxime Coquelin]

Hi,

On 7/1/24 23:27, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> In latest 3GPP 38.212, the k0 value is not necessaraly directly

necessarily*

> derived from rv_index, in that case a value can be provided in
> API. When this value is non null this would override the value
> which would be computed purely from rv_index.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
> ---
>   doc/guides/prog_guide/bbdev.rst | 2 ++
>   lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev_op.h        | 4 ++++
>   2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/bbdev.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/bbdev.rst
> index 09e5f0d990..e3f356450b 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/bbdev.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/bbdev.rst
> @@ -1021,6 +1021,8 @@ The LDPC decode parameters are set out in the table below.
>   +----------------+------------+-------------------------------------------------------+
>   |                |eb          |Eb, length of the RM output sequence in bits  r >= cab |
>   +----------------+------------+-------------------------------------------------------+
> +|                |k0          |Optional k0 Rate matching starting position override   |
> ++----------------+------------+-------------------------------------------------------+
>   
>   The mbuf input ``input`` encoded CB data is mandatory for all BBDEV PMDs
>   and is the Virtual Circular Buffer data stream with null padding.
> diff --git a/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev_op.h b/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev_op.h
> index 459631d0d0..b5dde116ab 100644
> --- a/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev_op.h
> +++ b/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev_op.h
> @@ -562,6 +562,10 @@ struct rte_bbdev_op_ldpc_dec {
>   		/** Struct which stores Transport Block specific parameters */
>   		struct rte_bbdev_op_dec_ldpc_tb_params tb_params;
>   	};
> +	/** Optional k0 Rate matching starting position, overrides rv_index when non null
> +	 *  [3GPP TS38.212, section 5.4.2.1]
> +	 */
> +	uint16_t k0;
>   };
>   /* >8 End of structure rte_bbdev_op_ldpc_dec. */
>   

Will fix the typo while applying.

Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>

Also reporting Hemant's Ack on the cover letter as patchwork doesn't
report them:
Acked-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>

Thanks,
Maxime

Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] test/bbdev: add support for k0 parameter

[Maxime Coquelin]

On 7/1/24 23:27, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> New k0 added in LDPC decoder structure can be parsed
> by the bbdev test application.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
> ---
>   app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c   | 7 +++++--
>   app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c | 4 ++++
>   app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.h | 1 +
>   3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> index 3a94f15a30..67c55605fd 100644
> --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> @@ -1923,6 +1923,7 @@ copy_reference_ldpc_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ops, unsigned int n,
>   		ops[i]->ldpc_dec.n_cb = ldpc_dec->n_cb;
>   		ops[i]->ldpc_dec.iter_max = ldpc_dec->iter_max;
>   		ops[i]->ldpc_dec.rv_index = ldpc_dec->rv_index;
> +		ops[i]->ldpc_dec.k0 = ldpc_dec->k0;
>   		ops[i]->ldpc_dec.op_flags = ldpc_dec->op_flags;
>   		ops[i]->ldpc_dec.code_block_mode = ldpc_dec->code_block_mode;
>   
> @@ -2171,8 +2172,10 @@ validate_op_chain(struct rte_bbdev_op_data *op,
>    * As per definition in 3GPP 38.212 Table 5.4.2.1-2
>    */
>   static inline uint16_t
> -get_k0(uint16_t n_cb, uint16_t z_c, uint8_t bg, uint8_t rv_index)
> +get_k0(uint16_t n_cb, uint16_t z_c, uint8_t bg, uint8_t rv_index, uint16_t k0)
>   {
> +	if (k0 > 0)
> +		return k0;
>   	if (rv_index == 0)
>   		return 0;
>   	uint16_t n = (bg == 1 ? N_ZC_1 : N_ZC_2) * z_c;
> @@ -2202,7 +2205,7 @@ compute_harq_len(struct rte_bbdev_op_ldpc_dec *ops_ld)
>   {
>   	uint16_t k0 = 0;
>   	uint8_t max_rv = (ops_ld->rv_index == 1) ? 3 : ops_ld->rv_index;
> -	k0 = get_k0(ops_ld->n_cb, ops_ld->z_c, ops_ld->basegraph, max_rv);
> +	k0 = get_k0(ops_ld->n_cb, ops_ld->z_c, ops_ld->basegraph, max_rv, ops_ld->k0);
>   	/* Compute RM out size and number of rows */
>   	uint16_t parity_offset = (ops_ld->basegraph == 1 ? 20 : 8)
>   			* ops_ld->z_c - ops_ld->n_filler;
> diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c
> index e48947b211..8b32850982 100644
> --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c
> +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c
> @@ -865,6 +865,10 @@ parse_ldpc_decoder_params(const char *key_token, char *token,
>   		vector->mask |= TEST_BBDEV_VF_RV_INDEX;
>   		ldpc_dec->rv_index = (uint8_t) strtoul(token, &err, 0);
>   		ret = ((err == NULL) || (*err != '\0')) ? -1 : 0;
> +	} else if (!strcmp(key_token, "k0")) {
> +		vector->mask |= TEST_BBDEV_VF_K0;
> +		ldpc_dec->k0 = (uint16_t) strtoul(token, &err, 0);
> +		ret = ((err == NULL) || (*err != '\0')) ? -1 : 0;
>   	} else if (!strcmp(key_token, "n_cb")) {
>   		vector->mask |= TEST_BBDEV_VF_NCB;
>   		ldpc_dec->n_cb = (uint16_t) strtoul(token, &err, 0);
> diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.h b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.h
> index ba1d0d20f9..9a2942132b 100644
> --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.h
> +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ enum {
>   	TEST_BBDEV_VF_CODE_BLOCK_MODE = (1ULL << 23),
>   	TEST_BBDEV_VF_OP_FLAGS = (1ULL << 24),
>   	TEST_BBDEV_VF_EXPECTED_STATUS = (1ULL << 25),
> +	TEST_BBDEV_VF_K0 = (1ULL << 26),
>   };
>   
>   enum op_data_type {


Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>

Also reporting Hemant's Ack on the cover letter as patchwork doesn't
report them:
Acked-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>

Thanks,
Maxime

Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] baseband/acc: add support for k0 parameter

[Maxime Coquelin]

On 7/1/24 23:27, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> The k0 may be provided to the PMD, which would be used
> as the circular buffer starting position instead of value
> which would be computed from legacy rv_index derived
> computation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h     | 6 ++++--
>   drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 2 +-
>   drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c    | 4 ++--
>   3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>

Also reporting Hemant's Ack on the cover letter as patchwork doesn't
report them:
Acked-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>

Thanks,
Maxime

Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] bbdev: new k0 parameter

[Maxime Coquelin]

On 7/1/24 23:27, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> Hi Maxime, Hemant,
> 
> Capturing below an extension for 24.11.
> This includes bbdev api change and related change for
> test application and acc/vrb PMD.
> This provides the ability which was introduced in 3gPP
> standard to have an alternate way to compute k0 no longer
> always computed just from rv_index. When that parameter
> is set, then it is used a k0 value (starting position
> in circular index), if null the legacy computation
> from rv index (more common) is maintained.
> 
> Nicolas Chautru (3):
>    bbdev: new k0 parameter for LDPC decoder operation
>    test/bbdev: add support for k0 parameter
>    baseband/acc: add support for k0 parameter
> 
>   app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c      | 7 +++++--
>   app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c    | 4 ++++
>   app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.h    | 1 +
>   doc/guides/prog_guide/bbdev.rst       | 2 ++
>   drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h     | 6 ++++--
>   drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 2 +-
>   drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c    | 4 ++--
>   lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev_op.h              | 4 ++++
>   8 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 

Applied to dpdk-next-baseband/for-main

Thanks,
Maxime