From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1596EA04DD; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:00:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D4EC8D8; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:00:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from mellanox.co.il (mail-il-dmz.mellanox.com [193.47.165.129]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9E9592C for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:00:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from Internal Mail-Server by MTLPINE1 (envelope-from michaelba@nvidia.com) with SMTP; 18 Nov 2020 19:00:19 +0200 Received: from nvidia.com (pegasus07.mtr.labs.mlnx [10.210.16.112]) by labmailer.mlnx (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 0AIH0Iwa005874; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:00:19 +0200 From: Michael Baum To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Matan Azrad , Raslan Darawsheh , Viacheslav Ovsiienko , stable@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:00:09 +0000 Message-Id: <1605718811-18652-5-git-send-email-michaelba@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1605718811-18652-1-git-send-email-michaelba@nvidia.com> References: <1605718811-18652-1-git-send-email-michaelba@nvidia.com> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/7] regex/mlx5: improve error messages in RXP rules flush X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" During the rules flush, the rxp_poll_csr_for_value function is called twice. The rxp_poll_csr_for_value function can fail for two reasons: 1. It could not read the value from register, in which case the function returns -1. 2. It read a value, but not the value it expected to receive. In this case it returns -EBUZY. When the function fails it prints an error message that is relevant only for a second type of failure. Moreover, for failure of the first type it prints a value of an uninitialized variable. In case of success, the function prints a debug message about the number of cycles it took. This line was probably copied by mistake, since the variable it reads from, is always equal to 0 and is not an indicator of the number of cycles. Remove the incorrect line about the cycles, and reduce the error print only for the relevant error. Fixes: b34d816363b5 ("regex/mlx5: support rules import") Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Michael Baum Acked-by: Ori Kam --- drivers/regex/mlx5/mlx5_rxp.c | 16 ++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regex/mlx5/mlx5_rxp.c b/drivers/regex/mlx5/mlx5_rxp.c index ba78cc0..fcbc766 100644 --- a/drivers/regex/mlx5/mlx5_rxp.c +++ b/drivers/regex/mlx5/mlx5_rxp.c @@ -179,12 +179,14 @@ count, ~0, MLX5_RXP_POLL_CSR_FOR_VALUE_TIMEOUT, id); if (ret < 0) { - DRV_LOG(ERR, "Rules not rx by RXP: credit: %d, depth: %d", val, - fifo_depth); + if (ret == -EBUSY) + DRV_LOG(ERR, "Rules not rx by RXP: credit: %d, depth:" + " %d", val, fifo_depth); + else + DRV_LOG(ERR, "CSR poll failed, can't read value!"); return ret; } DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "RTRU FIFO depth: 0x%x", fifo_depth); - DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "Rules flush took %d cycles.", ret); ret = mlx5_devx_regex_register_read(ctx, id, MLX5_RXP_RTRU_CSR_CTRL, &val); if (ret) { @@ -203,10 +205,12 @@ MLX5_RXP_RTRU_CSR_STATUS_UPDATE_DONE, MLX5_RXP_POLL_CSR_FOR_VALUE_TIMEOUT, id); if (ret < 0) { - DRV_LOG(ERR, "Rules update timeout: 0x%08X", val); + if (ret == -EBUSY) + DRV_LOG(ERR, "Rules update timeout: 0x%08X", val); + else + DRV_LOG(ERR, "CSR poll failed, can't read value!"); return ret; } - DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "Rules update took %d cycles", ret); if (mlx5_devx_regex_register_read(ctx, id, MLX5_RXP_RTRU_CSR_CTRL, &val)) { DRV_LOG(ERR, "CSR read failed!"); @@ -215,7 +219,7 @@ val &= ~(MLX5_RXP_RTRU_CSR_CTRL_GO); if (mlx5_devx_regex_register_write(ctx, id, MLX5_RXP_RTRU_CSR_CTRL, val)) { - DRV_LOG(ERR, "CSR write write failed!"); + DRV_LOG(ERR, "CSR write failed!"); return -1; } -- 1.8.3.1