From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F884A0545; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:24:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96ACC93E; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:24:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com (szxga05-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.191]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB371C93C; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:24:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from DGGEMS411-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4ChM5W2sDZzLvXY; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:24:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.69.192.56) by DGGEMS411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.211) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:24:38 +0800 From: "Min Hu (Connor)" To: CC: , , , , Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:24:56 +0800 Message-ID: <1606357496-8650-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.69.192.56] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [v1, 2/2] bonding: fix PCI address comparison on non-pci ports X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" what scenarios may cause bugs in old ways. Could you give an example, thanks.