DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@cloudius-systems.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] VMXNET3 on vmware, ping delay
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 20:44:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1606901.Dh26nmAAAf@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <558C2256.4070802@cloudius-systems.com>

2015-06-25 18:46, Avi Kivity:
> On 06/25/2015 06:18 PM, Matthew Hall wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 09:14:53AM +0000, Vass, Sandor (Nokia - HU/Budapest) wrote:
> >> According to my understanding each packet should go
> >> through BR as fast as possible, but it seems that the rte_eth_rx_burst
> >> retrieves packets only when there are at least 2 packets on the RX queue of
> >> the NIC. At least most of the times as there are cases (rarely - according
> >> to my console log) when it can retrieve 1 packet also and sometimes only 3
> >> packets can be retrieved...
> > By default DPDK is optimized for throughput not latency. Try a test with
> > heavier traffic.
> >
> > There is also some work going on now for DPDK interrupt-driven mode, which
> > will work more like traditional Ethernet drivers instead of polling mode
> > Ethernet drivers.
> >
> > Though I'm not an expert on it, there is also a series of ways to optimize for
> > latency, which hopefully some others could discuss... or maybe search the
> > archives / web site / Intel tuning documentation.
> >
> 
> What would be useful is a runtime switch between polling and interrupt 
> modes.  This was if the load is load you use interrupts, and as 
> mitigation, you switch to poll mode, until the load drops again.

DPDK is not a stack. It's up to the DPDK application to poll or use interrupts
when needed.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-06-25 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-25  9:14 Vass, Sandor (Nokia - HU/Budapest)
2015-06-25 15:18 ` Matthew Hall
2015-06-25 15:46   ` Avi Kivity
2015-06-25 16:37     ` Matthew Hall
2015-06-25 18:44     ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2015-06-25 18:54       ` Matthew Hall
2015-06-25 19:20       ` Avi Kivity
2015-06-25 20:56   ` Patel, Rashmin N
2015-06-25 21:13     ` Vass, Sandor (Nokia - HU/Budapest)
2015-06-25 22:36       ` Matthew Hall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1606901.Dh26nmAAAf@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=avi@cloudius-systems.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).