From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E98A034F; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 18:08:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26AA4068B; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 18:08:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97D04067E for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 18:07:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D61580674; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 12:07:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 07 Jun 2021 12:07:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= xXorOhlbGunBgRaKEEhlXrTuVpBa9H+50TCTDm6VVtA=; b=3z7KS840VZR7suYj rkZUE7U1vqEVKFOTRe5Y49DUKY6xeO09XD+HKM3yx4kUBL9eO1SdCyts6DMNyzLG hL+6Lt+M4kBsCJwd5cQAauz6YCP2TsDt461iZFK2BZVEjW+IKrpUzQKFNM0C/BXt 9AQsMWOToapPsO7o7OZL3KN7YW40hhu+US2HGPfK1zIy+BiwxIvhIznJJl5ievrJ C6NtI0wqqycRu40Z7l05uHM8GkGkmhFMFdw7qQcx7zoTFWsMzbxfEu2zwGzZ9MDY DEjY688P6A6Jf0KjhSnTLn5YDa99MFcT/M47z1iOAP/aRCvnKGjBQDXsi8hmD5RE ZBd+EA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=xXorOhlbGunBgRaKEEhlXrTuVpBa9H+50TCTDm6VV tA=; b=ctnJau46IEarztsoieHpcxRRHHzI5YnNzx16aP2a+Zl766uJeSfB6+p+Z pD4356XpOXsz0OEbAKJyB8VbJneC6TYb+FHhQUGBikBmEXJk2OMJfJw3W/wk9Bjw QPBlr1fBaARdL2rkculQYqTNsUNdRsM5eAYBX2v94A2ASxr3ZYSuCTMIyGXXGW3N 73SD4dBGaeCTsOyzdPKrDkFADGew+hrMFe2CKRbRwGpE4iOZztlgxNO1dKJ7x6Ox FJ1GdDbrOVSi5kRdeh7l3SFiHHLkqmCUfUjs7EsW34FIk/txMxGsiUBxXvfTuhwU nTt0ug0PA511aAjLtHkPyIESrd7sQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrfedtjedgleeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepleetheefteeivdejgeeiuedtkefhvdeffeffveelkeeutddujeet hffghfdvhedunecuffhomhgrihhnpehfrhgrmhgruggrthgvrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhn jhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 12:07:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ilya Maximets Cc: Ori Kam , Andrew Rybchenko , Ivan Malov , Eli Britstein , "dev@dpdk.org" , Smadar Fuks , Hyong Youb Kim , Kishore Padmanabha , Ajit Khaparde , Jerin Jacob , John Daley , Ferruh Yigit Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 18:07:54 +0200 Message-ID: <16072371.opfqJCapsB@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20210601111420.5549-1-ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] ethdev: clarify flow action PORT ID semantics X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 07/06/2021 15:21, Ilya Maximets: > On 6/7/21 2:08 PM, Ori Kam wrote: > > From: Andrew Rybchenko > >> On 6/7/21 11:28 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >>> I see emails don't work well to conclude on how to manage representors. > >>> I propose working in live meetings so we can try to align our views on > >>> a virtual whiteboard and interactively ask questions. > >>> Participants in those meetings could work on documenting what is the > >>> view of a representor as a first step. > >>> Second step, it should be easier to discuss the API. > >>> > >>> If you agree, I will plan a first meeting where we can discuss what is > >>> a representor in our opinions. > >>> The meeting time would be 4pm UTC. > >>> For the day, I would propose this Thursday 10 if it works for > >>> everybody involved. > > Second half of the day (CET) is pretty much booked in my calendar. Tuesday > or Wednesday might work on this week. Wednesday or Thursday might work on > next week. > > >> OK for me. > > O.K. for me too. OK let's decide with a poll please: https://framadate.org/PAP3t8ycqx3lEUfe