From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>,
Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
jing.d.chen@intel.com
Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, vincent.jardin@6wind.com, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] i40e SR-IOV with Linux PF
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:35:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1623193.ZGhhn5RSHY@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <248236628.l6b5mhHNAu@xps13>
+Cc dev@dpdk.org
2017-03-13 15:29, Thomas Monjalon:
> Hi i40e developers,
>
> Referring to the VFD discussion, I thought basic behaviours were the
> same regardless of the PF driver:
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-December/053056.html
> "
> > In the meanwhile, we have some test models ongoing to validate
> > combination of Linux and DPDK drivers for VF and PF.
> > We'll fully support below 4 cases going forward.
> > 1. DPDK PF + DPDK VF
> > 2. DPDK PF + Linux VF
> > 3. Linux PF + DPDK VF
> > 4. Linux PF + Linux VF (it's not our scope)
> [...]
> > Linux PF + DPDK VF has been tested with 1.0 API long time ago.
> > There is some test activities ongoing.
> "
>
> I think the Linux PF case is important and deserves more consideration.
> When looking at the code, specifically i40evf_vlan_offload_set() and
> i40evf_vlan_pvid_set(), I read this:
> "
> /* Linux pf host doesn't support vlan offload yet */
> if (vf->version_major == I40E_DPDK_VERSION_MAJOR) {
> "
>
> Is there some work in progress on Linux side to get the same behaviour
> as with a DPDK PF?
>
> At least, it must be documented in
> doc/guides/nics/features/i40e_vf.ini
> and marked as partially supported (P instead of Y) in
> doc/guides/nics/i40e.rst
next parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-13 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <248236628.l6b5mhHNAu@xps13>
2017-03-13 14:35 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2017-03-14 4:44 ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-03-14 9:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-03-14 14:48 ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-03-14 13:59 ` Chen, Jing D
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1623193.ZGhhn5RSHY@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=jing.d.chen@intel.com \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.jardin@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).