From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f52.google.com (mail-lf0-f52.google.com [209.85.215.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03CF98D86 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:02:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf0-f52.google.com with SMTP id h129so65090346lfh.1 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 01:02:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gQMIcc6J6ZwzojQg+SYuKLD4vfUd3TkjsZI7gVqVcNs=; b=KQjiE6/vWuYGEGBuf1pu1sjBeUb4qxA2tdgrRJKoSplpfvT5VfFiuoqfHL8dCzx6kW ZpPaFnhX8p7SQiC8a2rT0YWZP34Ky4ZGDSSrw13gji4b9/j0J7M12zCcoEXZ4JG1DgxY 4TAyjDb+CWOw0NZVOslMTF2s1Nvzyj0auq5dK+kzH6CUeXRpzQRNqgvVekwBuVcHHqu7 Ky6s48VkL5Tnac5C8WlNQuGUsj5rPeVzUKw75/1SZZsiAkF0dZP2FlA8rkbnatTfSPCu NqfJcvutaTu9Hrw4YtFxkyqQIEC+S66bH84R7/jrWK2Rfq3bQMHtU3HxTE/dQtBbZOJi Fotw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gQMIcc6J6ZwzojQg+SYuKLD4vfUd3TkjsZI7gVqVcNs=; b=CO+yVDxuMzb6GxS1fJhCtWjoEjp1URNB56mtPg5jqguGIVn6PNcDbfYpvkMD8D/upr x6ZhrDrT+2p9efrt3rxJM80cprdGride03jNfe4rw0aa0wIM3bAZ/bwtfhx3Vn4Z8/Kx kHy2/WL/m7ACuw15d/6c1Wppydmr5b2cnzlp8D2XHgnBdSyAT+E1ynNF+Y4+waTtkOox 2CJlik1GJFSTTvilwa07dXsxRsUIdvWP3fka6IdhFq9LZCOtMuX6bZF+WmJpdZuh4Z/c xpM0o/zb5V0xWbcizGVMSWEP7j6/cHYgXF3iaP7+zAMlsJw07VlgGF/vFq2oKxKKpbpX nToQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLeQAL3+GVXs2T2KibH5w9JMvi2o0Lw8cjNYX1iKyq+JSFHeoDDT0moR/Kj9582uBOn X-Received: by 10.28.20.139 with SMTP id 133mr7140616wmu.19.1466582553673; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 01:02:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d192sm6793760wmd.14.2016.06.22.01.02.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Jun 2016 01:02:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Hunt Cc: dev@dpdk.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com, viktorin@rehivetech.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, shreyansh.jain@nxp.com Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:02:31 +0200 Message-ID: <1624460.4tjituxyrE@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1565408.6y3gpXryvJ@xps13> References: <1466171618-27358-1-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com> <1466337953-111495-1-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com> <1565408.6y3gpXryvJ@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v15 0/3] mempool: add mempool handler feature X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 08:02:34 -0000 2016-06-22 09:56, Thomas Monjalon: > 2016-06-19 13:05, David Hunt: > > v15 changes: > > > > * Changed rte_mempool_ops_get() to rte_mempool_get_ops() > > I don't find this change in the patch. > But I wonder wether it is really needed. If we assume that rte_mempool_ops_* are wrappers on top of handlers, rte_mempool_ops_get and rte_mempool_ops_register should be renamed to rte_mempool_get_ops and rte_mempool_register_ops.