From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B1FA0A02; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 23:01:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094B5140D0F; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 23:01:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD49140D0D for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 23:01:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E051C5C010A; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 17:01:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 17:01:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= q52ztkt5lFnvLfwpDdNKtx6VnCpgIs7CqqGVbc3SnnM=; b=c62lHDk3aI37jOzg EWKhkwfIH9lboQVPawVNESgrdOipw0mSbY3MJgqr2uAA7oyTxoTVXbrfvyhSE/wY yWKNgto/JobQfOwXAA55eqGu4Wmhty9ac9us5frfQjytJiP8Clsgs7SZXdgrVsqG P3jEoAxdS5loQeIUFgfA/GNkA/nVRItz2XIxEHpRtpTf3uxD2BKtGcuU72gVw9ks CgysYZueTeKwBWPygquyMFxVFhIW83Lj1sAIxTcFB0hWNgN7iAcW6jq857/z1aq7 2BbtppM+8jg/fngVwywE0TzdXsgJWBCLB71XMNL94kLCpoDhKWhZa2yY0SuBdmmk bePZuw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=q52ztkt5lFnvLfwpDdNKtx6VnCpgIs7CqqGVbc3Sn nM=; b=Olttrtj3bdYd3H22jW0yqlc9i0MNxm43+hZvxHc6ewpEjOyObrhqL0gB7 1zt/gBPjnXqp2ZV6tJxxu0+wUj6VPe+yHoKKT+vI+2DZLRUeFLL0HRwSLeeWKQsE qvRvGTBYphgaamBc3KUsPLmm5J9px5xHRtyAPPbmITWGjO4hjdcBGuU063isWhdN fMwjqmEr1qsYJBfUZzAWHZAjIqQjtXcALzh+Kh9BTz8hj0Xj8yNr/HiVZ6uOu9Fz u6TIQnDzMTZccL03v7qUTZQE0IOTgNHyez2Sf1bVqEKNTXZBhkYuNw9OixV1Ha1i clE9UrV/6BAkbZ/xIgGYwZ1ooAa+A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedukedrtdefgdduheehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfure dttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshes mhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefge elgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueeiiedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddv tdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9F2DD1080067; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 17:01:35 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: david.marchand@redhat.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 23:01:34 +0100 Message-ID: <1624576.mXulGEC3Iq@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20210113190542.223445-1-thomas@monjalon.net> References: <20201207173319.1397740-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20210113190542.223445-1-thomas@monjalon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] devtools: avoid installing static binaries X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 13/01/2021 20:05, Thomas Monjalon: > When testing compilation and checking ABI compatibility, > there is no real need of static binaries eating disks. > > The static linkage of applications was already well tested, > though the static examples tested with meson were limited to "l3fwd" only. > The static build test with make is limited to "helloworld" example. > > The ABI compatibility is checked on shared libraries, > and there is no need to test again on similar builds. > A new parameter is added to the function "build", > so the ABI check is enabled only for native gcc and clang shared builds, > 32-bit, generic armv8 and ppc cross compilations. > In other words, it is disabled for some static builds and some Arm ones. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > --- > v2: > - separate ABI check enablement from default library > - disable ABI check in specific Arm builds > --- [...] > -build build-x86-default cc -Dlibdir=lib -Dmachine=$default_machine $use_shared > +build build-x86-default cc ABI \ > + -Dlibdir=lib -Dmachine=$default_machine $use_shared After a second thought, I think this one should be "skipABI".