From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275642C8
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:54:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1838D21AE6;
 Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:54:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:54:01 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
 :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=ckGBaE1pz0Va19Pgcm/+PzF8f8
 J9mnVyt2uCglS8k/A=; b=p+DFBH/awbv77XjbxecFlcSWpMsUwvepsbQ7VLrht/
 RgVJ3mUBNRvBepa8Mx+8W+0USV+6XBSQo+bqhcR47S5c8FkpHidpqlgmxNi6wWEw
 Ax2PQXJFwHtxXgv/OhBSSSievgpya0HhrZp8+iuLdlc5+SeyNST2rjWEwfsrqgjo
 w=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ckGBaE
 1pz0Va19Pgcm/+PzF8f8J9mnVyt2uCglS8k/A=; b=He2A83d0tLAhtSPbuVEsBw
 MwJX6YJDl37U+pVR/62D0VaTYnRMPeHAFWyxtteilW5W7cJOUURXvXyJH/3jiH/T
 HaguTrzD3OwEUnFYwJW2c4aI3ycITW0iayk8/alyIJ/GfC0cCzU/r2VELVGwwvLS
 ybnK4BRdQ0V95rTiWqem37LbC2lpoIZcUpR5oTBjKFupo4m535wewG8TzszWP4ED
 Yo1/UZqKc1fWIPT9y+ogzcX0hK81C0orLi+n3NZ4nlFFBUCkP5E39sM3IsAZMFVX
 ElNH0nCnErslNM+ND7wa6x527Sa+GW5VqP50ypctm9nuzrMjKrFrOhjx1omHX2fg
 ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:CP68Wg9PEUswtOuW3ak5iCDAZi0vQSzWID1WICm0b_fPvJRwEes-Vw>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 59EC810351;
 Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:54:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Sam <batmanustc@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:53:46 +0200
Message-ID: <1627630.qDTFsr7CPG@xps>
In-Reply-To: <CAOE=1Z2GT_i=A0SUEyitWkrqTY84dAZaAk4ZisT+Ho6yJibPAg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOE=1Z2GT_i=A0SUEyitWkrqTY84dAZaAk4ZisT+Ho6yJibPAg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Bug in "rte_eth_dev_attach" while using mlx5 pmd
	driver?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 14:54:03 -0000

Hi,

29/03/2018 09:00, Sam:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm using OVS-2.8.0 + DPDK-17.05-rc1, with 2 pf and 1 vf port under mlx5
> pmd driver, like this:

I did not really look at your issue because you are using a
DPDK release candidate.

When looking at http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/faq/releases/
we can find the DPDK releases to use for which OVS:
	2.8.x   17.05.2
	2.9.x   17.11

Please update