From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <thomas@monjalon.net>, <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, <lihuisong@huawei.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC V1] ethdev: fix the issue that dev uninit may be called twice
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 20:46:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1627908397-51565-1-git-send-email-lihuisong@huawei.com> (raw)
Ethernet devices in DPDK can be released by rte_eth_dev_close() and
rte_dev_remove(). However, these two APIs do not have explicit invocation
restrictions. In other words, at the ethdev layer, calling
rte_eth_dev_close() and then rte_dev_remove() or rte_eal_hotplug_remove()
is allowed. In such a bad scenario, the primary process may be fine, but it
may cause that dev_unint() in the secondary process will be called twice,
and even other serious problems. So this patch fixes it.
Fixes: 99a2dd955fba ("lib: remove librte_ prefix from directory names")
Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
---
lib/ethdev/ethdev_pci.h | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/ethdev/ethdev_pci.h b/lib/ethdev/ethdev_pci.h
index 8edca82..14a0e01 100644
--- a/lib/ethdev/ethdev_pci.h
+++ b/lib/ethdev/ethdev_pci.h
@@ -151,6 +151,19 @@ rte_eth_dev_pci_generic_remove(struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev,
if (!eth_dev)
return 0;
+ /*
+ * The eth_dev->data->name doesn't be cleared by the secondary precess,
+ * so above "eth_dev" isn't NULL after rte_eth_dev_close() called.
+ * Namely, whether "eth_dev" is NULL cannot be used to determine whether
+ * an ethdev port has been released.
+ * For both primary precess and secondary precess, eth_dev->state is
+ * RTE_ETH_DEV_UNUSED, which means the ethdev port has been released.
+ */
+ if (eth_dev->state == RTE_ETH_DEV_UNUSED) {
+ RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(INFO, "The ethdev port has been released.");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
if (dev_uninit) {
ret = dev_uninit(eth_dev);
if (ret)
--
2.8.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-08-02 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-02 12:46 Huisong Li [this message]
2021-08-03 2:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC V2] ethdev: fix issue that dev close in PMD calls twice Huisong Li
2021-08-13 2:11 ` Huisong Li
2021-08-13 6:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-08-13 8:16 ` Huisong Li
2021-08-18 11:24 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-08-19 3:45 ` Huisong Li
2021-08-24 14:42 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-08-25 9:53 ` Huisong Li
2021-09-04 1:23 ` Huisong Li
2021-09-18 3:31 ` Huisong Li
2021-09-20 14:07 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-09-22 3:31 ` Huisong Li
2021-09-28 7:19 ` Singh, Aman Deep
2021-09-30 10:54 ` Huisong Li
2021-09-30 11:01 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-08 6:13 ` lihuisong (C)
2021-08-18 9:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC V1] ethdev: fix the issue that dev uninit may be called twice Singh, Aman Deep
2021-08-24 2:10 ` Huisong Li
2021-10-08 8:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: fix eth device released repeatedly Huisong Li
2021-10-08 10:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-09 1:29 ` lihuisong (C)
2021-10-12 11:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2] " Huisong Li
2021-10-12 15:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-14 3:50 ` lihuisong (C)
2021-10-14 12:32 ` lihuisong (C)
2021-10-14 12:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-15 3:03 ` lihuisong (C)
2021-10-15 3:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3] " Huisong Li
2021-10-19 13:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-21 2:31 ` lihuisong (C)
2021-10-21 2:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4] " Huisong Li
2021-10-21 21:19 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1627908397-51565-1-git-send-email-lihuisong@huawei.com \
--to=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).