From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20242882 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:36:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730802073D; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:36:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:36:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=hGIp72SUMXRm3Og 0uFw/j2q49kECj7c7tbWiBbAmbJI=; b=qjWkSWxW+XHU2JXvbVi1aK1uCBYRag8 hgmQIkUrwWvscspjYhpjJUa0mRLC0KTsYfLqGRU/1vvpj4PivPf0o0vydyKQZ2iw xN3K84HPc+lwjZ98dzPqyaFHpV5mPIP8EXPXPF8FBwghfYN9eU35MXyOU8dKRDJ5 HOIevjiZHKyw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=hGIp72SUMXRm3Og0uFw/j2q49kECj7c7tbWiBbAmbJI=; b=aItRR0id Y6OeMkmapWUxh0AogtjZHWL7uEWY/etiFWGfjgFoen5c5Eah88394nVqspJWxAov anuBCO3j9yvN5yYeWSp8+1A5O3+i6ABJVMDffIN5nH2kCkLKp3WQG59tBcHJAQXD L/wHmMsqXSuPlC9GLmIZqmM0CX2fwuHGNTrqhQyPn3HQH85dgoR8E5DYSe8z95AT 8LD314xwe1mCtIsRqQh1Rw7qlI1q9aKcdFkilV5g8FP4A34x54jsGpCkDLjIyfpz ePN3isScB3yf9/ykhQ3TVjmXyuhE97zrcHVGlhsGPu5yDqCmpluC7WBsCkg6z2+X IjEjbnD1yfah/g== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: oC8SLjdCJNXbTkgd9wKCXmhdhi9N8s9ZMxq5LFxXqOKt 1500024982 Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 27BF47E8BF; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:36:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Yang, Qiming" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Chen, Jing D" , "Wu, Jingjing" Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:36:21 +0200 Message-ID: <1629687.yhtlj0WEf7@xps> In-Reply-To: <4341B239C0EFF9468EE453F9E9F4604D3C67D3CA@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1493950673-15953-1-git-send-email-qiming.yang@intel.com> <4341B239C0EFF9468EE453F9E9F4604D3C67D3CA@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] test: add delay time in test alarm X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:36:23 -0000 > > > Because accuracy of timing to the microsecond is not guaranteed in > > > rte_eal_alarm_set, this function will not be called before the > > > requested time, but may be called a period of time afterwards which > > > can not be calculated. In order to ensure test alarm running success, > > > this patch added the delay time before check the flag. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Qiming Yang > > Acked-by : Jing Chen Applied, thanks