DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>,
	Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
	Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Konstantin Ananyev" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Archana Muniganti <marchana@marvell.com>,
	Tejasree Kondoj <ktejasree@marvell.com>,
	Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	"Radu Nicolau" <radu.nicolau@intel.com>,
	Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>,
	Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/6] test/crypto: add packets hard expiry tests
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 15:37:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1632823662-384-6-git-send-email-anoobj@marvell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1632823662-384-1-git-send-email-anoobj@marvell.com>

Add tests to validate packets hard expiry handling.

Signed-off-by: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>

---
 app/test/test_cryptodev.c                | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
 app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.h |  1 +
 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
index 1befbeb..34b55a9 100644
--- a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
+++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
@@ -9116,7 +9116,8 @@ test_ipsec_proto_all(const struct ipsec_test_flags *flags)
 	int ret;
 
 	if (flags->iv_gen ||
-	    flags->sa_expiry_pkts_soft)
+	    flags->sa_expiry_pkts_soft ||
+	    flags->sa_expiry_pkts_hard)
 		nb_pkts = IPSEC_TEST_PACKETS_MAX;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(aead_list); i++) {
@@ -9193,6 +9194,18 @@ test_ipsec_proto_sa_exp_pkts_soft(const void *data __rte_unused)
 }
 
 static int
+test_ipsec_proto_sa_exp_pkts_hard(const void *data __rte_unused)
+{
+	struct ipsec_test_flags flags;
+
+	memset(&flags, 0, sizeof(flags));
+
+	flags.sa_expiry_pkts_hard = true;
+
+	return test_ipsec_proto_all(&flags);
+}
+
+static int
 test_ipsec_proto_err_icv_corrupt(const void *data __rte_unused)
 {
 	struct ipsec_test_flags flags;
@@ -14153,6 +14166,10 @@ static struct unit_test_suite ipsec_proto_testsuite  = {
 			ut_setup_security, ut_teardown,
 			test_ipsec_proto_sa_exp_pkts_soft),
 		TEST_CASE_NAMED_ST(
+			"SA expiry packets hard",
+			ut_setup_security, ut_teardown,
+			test_ipsec_proto_sa_exp_pkts_hard),
+		TEST_CASE_NAMED_ST(
 			"Negative test: ICV corruption",
 			ut_setup_security, ut_teardown,
 			test_ipsec_proto_err_icv_corrupt),
diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.c
index 56a44b5..046536c 100644
--- a/app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.c
+++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.c
@@ -200,6 +200,10 @@ test_ipsec_td_update(struct ipsec_test_data td_inb[],
 			td_inb[i].input_text.data[icv_pos] += 1;
 		}
 
+		if (flags->sa_expiry_pkts_hard)
+			td_inb[i].ipsec_xform.life.packets_hard_limit =
+					IPSEC_TEST_PACKETS_MAX - 1;
+
 		if (flags->udp_encap)
 			td_inb[i].ipsec_xform.options.udp_encap = 1;
 
@@ -285,9 +289,10 @@ test_ipsec_td_verify(struct rte_mbuf *m, const struct ipsec_test_data *td,
 	uint8_t *output_text = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(m, uint8_t *);
 	uint32_t skip, len = rte_pktmbuf_pkt_len(m);
 
-	/* For negative tests, no need to do verification */
-	if (flags->icv_corrupt &&
-	    td->ipsec_xform.direction == RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS)
+	/* For tests with status as error for test success, skip verification */
+	if (td->ipsec_xform.direction == RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS &&
+	    (flags->icv_corrupt ||
+	     flags->sa_expiry_pkts_hard))
 		return TEST_SUCCESS;
 
 	if (td->ipsec_xform.direction == RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS &&
@@ -404,6 +409,17 @@ test_ipsec_status_check(struct rte_crypto_op *op,
 {
 	int ret = TEST_SUCCESS;
 
+	if (dir == RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS &&
+	    flags->sa_expiry_pkts_hard &&
+	    pkt_num == IPSEC_TEST_PACKETS_MAX) {
+		if (op->status != RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_ERROR) {
+			printf("SA hard expiry (pkts) test failed\n");
+			return TEST_FAILED;
+		} else {
+			return TEST_SUCCESS;
+		}
+	}
+
 	if (dir == RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS && flags->icv_corrupt) {
 		if (op->status != RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_ERROR) {
 			printf("ICV corruption test case failed\n");
diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.h b/app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.h
index eed3476..18f3c64 100644
--- a/app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.h
+++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.h
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ struct ipsec_test_data {
 struct ipsec_test_flags {
 	bool display_alg;
 	bool sa_expiry_pkts_soft;
+	bool sa_expiry_pkts_hard;
 	bool icv_corrupt;
 	bool iv_gen;
 	bool udp_encap;
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-28 10:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-17 13:42 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] Add SA lifetime in security Anoob Joseph
2021-08-17 13:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] security: add SA lifetime configuration Anoob Joseph
2021-08-17 13:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] common/cnxk: support " Anoob Joseph
2021-08-17 13:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] crypto/octeontx2: add checks for life configuration Anoob Joseph
2021-08-17 13:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] test/crypto: add packets soft expiry tests Anoob Joseph
2021-08-17 13:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] test/crypto: add packets hard " Anoob Joseph
2021-09-07 16:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] Add SA lifetime in security Anoob Joseph
2021-09-07 16:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] security: add SA lifetime configuration Anoob Joseph
2021-09-16 11:06     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-09-17  4:48       ` Anoob Joseph
2021-09-07 16:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] common/cnxk: support " Anoob Joseph
2021-09-07 16:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] crypto/octeontx2: add checks for life configuration Anoob Joseph
2021-09-07 16:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] test/crypto: add packets soft expiry tests Anoob Joseph
2021-09-07 16:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] test/crypto: add packets hard " Anoob Joseph
2021-09-07 16:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] examples/ipsec-secgw: clear soft expiry configuration Anoob Joseph
2021-09-16 11:11     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-09-28 10:07   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] Add SA lifetime in security Anoob Joseph
2021-09-28 10:07     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] security: add SA lifetime configuration Anoob Joseph
2021-09-28 10:07     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] common/cnxk: support " Anoob Joseph
2021-09-28 10:07     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/6] crypto/octeontx2: add checks for life configuration Anoob Joseph
2021-09-28 10:07     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/6] test/crypto: add packets soft expiry tests Anoob Joseph
2021-09-28 10:07     ` Anoob Joseph [this message]
2021-09-28 10:07     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] examples/ipsec-secgw: clear soft expiry configuration Anoob Joseph
2021-09-28 10:59     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/6] Add SA lifetime in security Anoob Joseph
2021-09-28 10:59       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/6] security: add SA lifetime configuration Anoob Joseph
2021-09-28 10:59       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/6] common/cnxk: support " Anoob Joseph
2021-09-28 10:59       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/6] crypto/octeontx2: add checks for life configuration Anoob Joseph
2021-09-28 10:59       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/6] test/crypto: add packets soft expiry cases Anoob Joseph
2021-09-28 10:59       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/6] test/crypto: add packets hard " Anoob Joseph
2021-09-28 10:59       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/6] examples/ipsec-secgw: clear soft expiry configuration Anoob Joseph
2021-09-28 14:40       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/6] Add SA lifetime in security Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1632823662-384-6-git-send-email-anoobj@marvell.com \
    --to=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
    --cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=ktejasree@marvell.com \
    --cc=marchana@marvell.com \
    --cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
    --cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).