From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C147EA0547; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 20:18:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756AE41108; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 20:18:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3804410D7 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 20:18:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453715C06D2; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 14:18:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 18 Apr 2021 14:18:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= WxntuWJB8SIM/bJWQmQrF+gST9DUjFHLh0eGfewVuwU=; b=KZkRqkbuEOYSfFAN IJYlbzqCD/ODy0KFvnGVrpMc6YYy9GEvf6c6sNF5BoVZxXVzfSDfDOWxqbe/FH5W vj/STZhXFciA3W2d854Z1HwFIeNDjxF9JF3nBxPaNf6rFBaL9aiCa+9ZR6qUGAby ttiJ7VwZsA3v/lxuLK0T/g6bZpo7OvpXKc/taKawOFFSa6cHOy7fyHA7dudJJcah abGDOyR0Qt4N5OVzHg92hPueQiXoi782ulhT44nr3y+sYJkYVHVArQ4J6gTVnnaI 1ybSZUd/QZ4KiSfW+wzZlxY3dcUhmTjGf6qYq2Xvy5fF9wdrW+5WsRrqNfEycQAA N7AIdA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=WxntuWJB8SIM/bJWQmQrF+gST9DUjFHLh0eGfewVu wU=; b=CAdzK6NOanTDqOcRVmmBMfrNBl3Z5qW90AOXNY8nMHiegxobQdr8NlbXG exPxySXSiVGjWyqlzCd2bumpvNx/6uKs4yndHlYKD3BQBzWHbOtqBjFAnzVgRzPz RTF1sZRLw54MGhz5pFeB6VeD3PrceLAh33xMLEHbaHXsYZJFFb2k+A0xQe2ZBTOr piwbiT4ltLyU3sky8/73BHCGenX6URcrTt7qtjIZfNB4zSPpq32XoO1s4fPi2mWy D95hNAfU2Cgavg+4OD15Ip3MArN4C17igsahmvXs6DmBkiMhSQsp89qZn/pRLEZJ bdQei3VubXAqh1d2lkSJxc/D3rpVw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvddtuddgfeduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BD990108005B; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 14:18:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jie Zhou , "dev@dpdk.org" , Tal Shnaiderman Cc: "dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com" , "xiaoyun.li@intel.com" , "roretzla@microsoft.com" , "pallavi.kadam@intel.com" , "bruce.richardson@intel.com" , "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 20:17:59 +0200 Message-ID: <1637838.CI588iCA6l@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <1618594501-23795-10-git-send-email-jizh@linux.microsoft.com> <1618595864-27839-10-git-send-email-jizh@linux.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 9/9] app/testpmd: enable building testpmd on Windows X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 18/04/2021 19:21, Tal Shnaiderman: > Building testpmd results in 2 warnings in clang: > > ../app/test-pmd/config.c:4254:1: warning: unused function 'print_fdir_mask' [-Wunused-function] > print_fdir_mask(struct rte_eth_fdir_masks *mask) > ^ > ../app/test-pmd/config.c:4289:1: warning: unused function 'print_fdir_flex_payload' [-Wunused-function] > print_fdir_flex_payload(struct rte_eth_fdir_flex_conf *flex_conf, uint32_t num) > ^ > 2 warnings generated. Why all tests are passing in the CI? I feel there is something wrong. We must test with -werror.