From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105ECA0C47; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 19:06:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A50426EB; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 19:05:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791C9410E8 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 19:05:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5529F20E61A9; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 10:05:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 5529F20E61A9 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1638381943; bh=pTb7orGI6mnmS3PLLi3x9Z2napBJklWtMQ0pt1Um1kY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=n0iMoo0PkURPI50eWoAgmbswQyxe+hygDBUGNDEAnYKtxLY4OIJXI/uA4GJNEtpFB 5aN0pv0KwyotXP7w+6WeCFw1WVjjzoimw7BTDoGWOo80htoxhrOn64bLIdgYB38xkl Zr2xIySjSdlJrj1Qh7hGaCIVCvCZq/sBjpH/3XF0= From: Jie Zhou To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com, roretzla@microsoft.com, navasile@linux.microsoft.com, dmitrym@microsoft.com, pallavi.kadam@intel.com, talshn@nvidia.com, thomas@monjalon.net, aconole@redhat.com Subject: [PATCH v9 7/9] app/test: remove two alarm_autotest cases Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 10:05:36 -0800 Message-Id: <1638381938-6113-8-git-send-email-jizh@linux.microsoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1638381938-6113-1-git-send-email-jizh@linux.microsoft.com> References: <1635216361-23641-1-git-send-email-jizh@linux.microsoft.com> <1638381938-6113-1-git-send-email-jizh@linux.microsoft.com> X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Remove two alarm_autotest test cases which do bogus range check on Windows. Signed-off-by: Jie Zhou --- app/test/test_alarm.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/app/test/test_alarm.c b/app/test/test_alarm.c index b4034339b8..70e97a3109 100644 --- a/app/test/test_alarm.c +++ b/app/test/test_alarm.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include "test.h" +#ifndef RTE_EXEC_ENV_WINDOWS static volatile int flag; static void @@ -18,6 +19,7 @@ test_alarm_callback(void *cb_arg) flag = 1; printf("Callback setting flag - OK. [cb_arg = %p]\n", cb_arg); } +#endif static int test_alarm(void) @@ -27,6 +29,7 @@ test_alarm(void) return 0; #endif +#ifndef RTE_EXEC_ENV_WINDOWS /* check if it will fail to set alarm with wrong us value */ printf("check if it will fail to set alarm with wrong ms values\n"); if (rte_eal_alarm_set(0, test_alarm_callback, @@ -39,6 +42,7 @@ test_alarm(void) printf("should not be successful with (UINT64_MAX-1) us value\n"); return -1; } +#endif /* check if it will fail to set alarm with null callback parameter */ printf("check if it will fail to set alarm with null callback parameter\n"); -- 2.31.0.vfs.0.1