From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B18A0096 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 09:17:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332601B9FD; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 09:17:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0299D1B9AD for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 09:17:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9034721F16; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 03:17:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Jun 2019 03:17:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=Ma99aXMkQzJSfhrrCVRVvjn1xnqYJdwdxB4XHBqKTuY=; b=UYcvJl1q2XTW L2yJGiN//DWz9BBYR8B4MYgIteZ9WpOOyUuWVsCMANbK95OyccV3UVc39Ud6z0IZ KvNvBfXxrvhhk73H0KM1QgELQ1P6AToKuPa7EkGovlqG/6lqyhNRQYZexBn0AdaE paIa/xVVwDlPaNn3fumcAchdTWHezbM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Ma99aXMkQzJSfhrrCVRVvjn1xnqYJdwdxB4XHBqKT uY=; b=MbpQhOzpuArfI3aY6zETtD3ntqtHkoGlMeM44qJqviBv9XZyv2Kxp2cE7 NMO3wWYz+63hMk81q+HIo4h23C/AuHUNKOCcs1ovuKWmhbrlyfq4I+9l4uaLH1JG 3nbprJljrmF7c97v1xs5hJtBnHkZ9GrZZIx/9h98FCFWamX68R8SKEfh5H1J4XM9 4ZGVHBaJwvWSWKrU3eKcoewWn6nCtxLH03jWaR1et2LvTlZjHS+9H71+Bi5Dwk2x gJJcxb0s0987psBPiuBeyP/rSVS7uEkE7kHm5VRB0907VyunItzlaYhXQEIbAm2R fJgETvt742aAFDXs14W8J4jf81URw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrudefkedguddulecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc fkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeht hhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 50E9A380073; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 03:17:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Marchand Cc: dev Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 09:17:16 +0200 Message-ID: <1642772.YoMAR6jVNy@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <20190603214737.14609-1-thomas@monjalon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce removal of old port count function X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 04/06/2019 09:12, David Marchand: > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 11:48 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst > > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst > > @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ Deprecation Notices > > > > + ``rte_eal_devargs_type_count`` > > > > +* ethdev: The function ``rte_eth_dev_count`` will be removed in DPDK > > 20.02. > > + It is replaced by the function ``rte_eth_dev_count_avail``. > > + If the intent is to iterate over ports, ``RTE_ETH_FOREACH_*`` macros > > + are better port iterators. > > + > > * vfio: removal of ``rte_vfio_dma_map`` and ``rte_vfio_dma_unmap`` APIs > > which > > have been replaced with ``rte_dev_dma_map`` and ``rte_dev_dma_unmap`` > > functions. The due date for the removal targets DPDK 20.02. > > Out of curiosity (ok, not entirely, since I need to write some notices). > Is there a rule for the order in which those entries are written? Yes the order should be the same as for the features in the release notes. > I can see a notice about ethdev later in the file. Indeed, ethdev is supposed to be after EAL, it is my mistake. > Acked-by: David Marchand