From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5ADA0C47; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 22:18:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB065407FF; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 22:18:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7DF40696 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 22:18:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899625C00E6; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 16:18:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 08 Oct 2021 16:18:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= RXgVUWWf38K1f0lXp4eQT8BvBQZxtbXcuIHzfuyfkWs=; b=VpotyYufv09lGJyE 9QS6wxfQ0VquYXCD9hkCg2463adjiyeinyU8S8Bf4hvIWTUFx4Sv1rIsVD6LLULY jaXjwx6gnOeR/EChBU6pGa3BPOZPbev1uVGq/+DlNKiM2K+Q2Fy132liYLklDaPI 2zz1C30B+pGhkW3EAY+rAg0gOVJLfAm6KYirIFwh24hbivU1RLH9HdFxYa6tEB+j 6AYh0KL+4U2+PYI/iKDBC2hjiZNBFgweF5sEqFZUhPluHix/f5ZqvazaPn3bCKPV zfPr9zXTqV7NU3TY3iTsSclaoGjEEvibBdqXv3mWo25ktnJ9rSDy7ss6K9HSE94x rFvwbQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=RXgVUWWf38K1f0lXp4eQT8BvBQZxtbXcuIHzfuyfk Ws=; b=hdN4zBxoImVWruxVKefSQiIt3LH+lq37+9owEydd5zSl1Xk2gzYUMzXY3 oYPu1fTvswaCCm0Lwkf2QaexdieYb8hzBtW99xKerLIWHmTAJHo09xxaqX/h6Gjl M6BwNxZCkGNiQgLHywrMXHDE4hKefh4YbpaVYwDRZfOhKLyez2yti1DUJNCog2Pe C70VI9kl0XMhfTfTGBp3poWNmvlq7Ve3Ba4YQ1k62iFwOlsbxfaOApfbzmgutnjH IXo7TjpAx6S/o0v/Ka/Zk6F0Gx73Edi7nAfnayVJX6UsjZo9pXI2yAby4rKC8AFr 4wZBMWWhAs6jdpb7TydI/Tj+IoeZg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvddttddgudeghecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdej ueeiiedvffegheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 16:18:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Elena Agostini Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 22:18:45 +0200 Message-ID: <1647473.KyNCEumvLx@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20211009015349.9694-6-eagostini@nvidia.com> References: <20210602203531.2288645-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20211009015349.9694-1-eagostini@nvidia.com> <20211009015349.9694-6-eagostini@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/9] gpudev: add memory API X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 09/10/2021 03:53, eagostini@nvidia.com: > --- a/lib/gpudev/version.map > +++ b/lib/gpudev/version.map > + rte_gpu_free; > rte_gpu_info_get; > rte_gpu_init; > rte_gpu_is_valid; > + rte_gpu_malloc; > + rte_gpu_register; > + rte_gpu_unregister; > }; Should we insert _mem_ in each function name? Proposal: rte_gpu_mem_alloc rte_gpu_mem_free rte_gpu_mem_register rte_gpu_mem_unregister