DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, gakhil@marvell.com, trix@redhat.com
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, ray.kinsella@intel.com,
	bruce.richardson@intel.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com,
	hernan.vargas@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com,
	Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] baseband/acc100: modify validation code for ACC101
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 13:48:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1652734113-124047-3-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1652734113-124047-1-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com>

The validation requirement is different for the two
devices.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
---
 drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
index fca27ef..daf2ce0 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
@@ -1293,6 +1293,14 @@
 	return (q->d->device_variant == ACC100_VARIANT);
 }
 
+#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
+static inline bool
+validate_op_required(struct acc100_queue *q)
+{
+	return is_acc100(q);
+}
+#endif
+
 /* Fill in a frame control word for LDPC decoding. */
 static inline void
 acc100_fcw_ld_fill(const struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc100_fcw_ld *fcw,
@@ -2187,8 +2195,10 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
 #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
 /* Validates turbo encoder parameters */
 static inline int
-validate_enc_op(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op)
+validate_enc_op(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op, struct acc100_queue *q)
 {
+	if (!validate_op_required(q))
+		return 0;
 	struct rte_bbdev_op_turbo_enc *turbo_enc = &op->turbo_enc;
 	struct rte_bbdev_op_enc_turbo_cb_params *cb = NULL;
 	struct rte_bbdev_op_enc_turbo_tb_params *tb = NULL;
@@ -2325,8 +2335,10 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
 }
 /* Validates LDPC encoder parameters */
 static inline int
-validate_ldpc_enc_op(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op)
+validate_ldpc_enc_op(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op, struct acc100_queue *q)
 {
+	if (!validate_op_required(q))
+		return 0;
 	struct rte_bbdev_op_ldpc_enc *ldpc_enc = &op->ldpc_enc;
 
 	if (op->mempool == NULL) {
@@ -2378,8 +2390,10 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
 
 /* Validates LDPC decoder parameters */
 static inline int
-validate_ldpc_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op)
+validate_ldpc_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc100_queue *q)
 {
+	if (!validate_op_required(q))
+		return 0;
 	struct rte_bbdev_op_ldpc_dec *ldpc_dec = &op->ldpc_dec;
 
 	if (op->mempool == NULL) {
@@ -2434,7 +2448,7 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
 
 #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
 	/* Validate op structure */
-	if (validate_enc_op(op) == -1) {
+	if (validate_enc_op(op, q) == -1) {
 		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Turbo encoder validation failed");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -2488,7 +2502,7 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
 
 #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
 	/* Validate op structure */
-	if (validate_ldpc_enc_op(ops[0]) == -1) {
+	if (validate_ldpc_enc_op(ops[0], q) == -1) {
 		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "LDPC encoder validation failed");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -2550,7 +2564,7 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
 
 #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
 	/* Validate op structure */
-	if (validate_ldpc_enc_op(op) == -1) {
+	if (validate_ldpc_enc_op(op, q) == -1) {
 		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "LDPC encoder validation failed");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -2607,7 +2621,7 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
 
 #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
 	/* Validate op structure */
-	if (validate_enc_op(op) == -1) {
+	if (validate_enc_op(op, q) == -1) {
 		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Turbo encoder validation failed");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -2680,8 +2694,10 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
 #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
 /* Validates turbo decoder parameters */
 static inline int
-validate_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op)
+validate_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc100_queue *q)
 {
+	if (!validate_op_required(q))
+		return 0;
 	struct rte_bbdev_op_turbo_dec *turbo_dec = &op->turbo_dec;
 	struct rte_bbdev_op_dec_turbo_cb_params *cb = NULL;
 	struct rte_bbdev_op_dec_turbo_tb_params *tb = NULL;
@@ -2827,7 +2843,7 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
 
 #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
 	/* Validate op structure */
-	if (validate_dec_op(op) == -1) {
+	if (validate_dec_op(op, q) == -1) {
 		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Turbo decoder validation failed");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -3052,7 +3068,7 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
 
 #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
 	/* Validate op structure */
-	if (validate_ldpc_dec_op(op) == -1) {
+	if (validate_ldpc_dec_op(op, q) == -1) {
 		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "LDPC decoder validation failed");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -3156,7 +3172,7 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
 
 #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
 	/* Validate op structure */
-	if (validate_ldpc_dec_op(op) == -1) {
+	if (validate_ldpc_dec_op(op, q) == -1) {
 		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "LDPC decoder validation failed");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -3246,7 +3262,7 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
 
 #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
 	/* Validate op structure */
-	if (validate_dec_op(op) == -1) {
+	if (validate_dec_op(op, q) == -1) {
 		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Turbo decoder validation failed");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-- 
1.8.3.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-16 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-27 18:16 [PATCH v2 0/5] drivers/baseband: PMD to support ACC101 device Nicolas Chautru
2022-04-27 18:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] baseband/acc100: introduce PMD for ACC101 Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-08 13:02   ` Tom Rix
2022-05-09 21:23     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-10  8:52       ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-05-10 11:55       ` Tom Rix
2022-05-23 17:53         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-04-27 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] baseband/acc100: modify validation code " Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-08 13:07   ` Tom Rix
2022-05-09 21:27     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-04-27 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] baseband/acc100: configuration of ACC101 from PF Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-08 13:38   ` Tom Rix
2022-05-09 21:36     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-10 12:02       ` Tom Rix
2022-04-27 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] baseband/acc100: start explicitly PF Monitor from PMD Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-08 13:44   ` Tom Rix
2022-05-09 22:07     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-04-27 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] baseband/acc100: add protection for some negative scenario Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-08 13:55   ` Tom Rix
2022-05-09 21:45     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-10 12:11       ` Tom Rix
2022-05-10 14:44         ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-05-16 20:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] drivers/baseband: PMD to support ACC101 device Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-16 20:48   ` [PATCH v3 1/4] baseband/acc100: introduce PMD for ACC101 Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-19 19:55     ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-16 20:48   ` Nicolas Chautru [this message]
2022-05-16 20:48   ` [PATCH v3 3/4] baseband/acc100: configuration of ACC101 from PF Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-19 20:13     ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-23 17:06       ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-16 20:48   ` [PATCH v3 4/4] baseband/acc100: add protection for some negative scenario Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-19 19:51   ` [PATCH v3 0/4] drivers/baseband: PMD to support ACC101 device Tom Rix
2022-05-23 21:25 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] drivers/baseband: PMD to support ACC100/ACC101 devices Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-23 21:25   ` [PATCH v4 1/5] baseband/acc100: update companion PF configure function Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-23 21:25   ` [PATCH v4 2/5] baseband/acc100: add protection for some negative scenario Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-23 21:25   ` [PATCH v4 3/5] baseband/acc100: introduce PMD for ACC101 Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-23 21:25   ` [PATCH v4 4/5] baseband/acc100: modify validation code " Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-23 21:25   ` [PATCH v4 5/5] baseband/acc100: configuration of ACC101 from PF Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-24  0:08 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] drivers/baseband: PMD to support ACC100/ACC101 devices Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-24  0:08   ` [PATCH v5 1/5] baseband/acc100: update companion PF configure function Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-24  0:08   ` [PATCH v5 2/5] baseband/acc100: add protection for some negative scenario Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-24  0:08   ` [PATCH v5 3/5] baseband/acc100: introduce PMD for ACC101 Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-24  0:08   ` [PATCH v5 4/5] baseband/acc100: modify validation code " Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-25 14:33     ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-25 22:15       ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-31  7:59         ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-31 18:19           ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-24  0:08   ` [PATCH v5 5/5] baseband/acc100: configuration of ACC101 from PF Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-25 13:24     ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-25 22:09       ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-26  0:49   ` [PATCH v6 0/5] drivers/baseband: PMD to support ACC100/ACC101 devices Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-26  0:55   ` Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-26  0:55     ` [PATCH v6 1/5] baseband/acc100: update companion PF configure function Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-26  0:55     ` [PATCH v6 2/5] baseband/acc100: add protection for some negative scenario Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-26  0:55     ` [PATCH v6 3/5] baseband/acc100: introduce PMD for ACC101 Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-30  7:40       ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-31 18:59         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-26  0:55     ` [PATCH v6 4/5] baseband/acc100: modify validation code " Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-31  8:02       ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-31 18:16         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-26  0:55     ` [PATCH v6 5/5] baseband/acc100: configuration of ACC101 from PF Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-31  7:35       ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-31 18:28         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-31 22:31   ` [PATCH v7 0/6] drivers/baseband: PMD to support ACC100/ACC101 devices Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-31 22:31     ` [PATCH v7 1/6] baseband/acc100: update companion PF configure function Nicolas Chautru
2022-06-02  9:49       ` Kevin Traynor
2022-06-02 16:52         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-06-03 20:25       ` Vargas, Hernan
2022-05-31 22:31     ` [PATCH v7 2/6] baseband/acc100: add protection for some negative scenario Nicolas Chautru
2022-06-02  8:21       ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-31 22:31     ` [PATCH v7 3/6] baseband/acc100: remove RTE prefix for internal macro Nicolas Chautru
2022-06-01 14:11       ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-06-01 17:15         ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-06-02 12:57           ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-31 22:31     ` [PATCH v7 4/6] baseband/acc100: introduce PMD for ACC101 Nicolas Chautru
2022-06-02 12:23       ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-31 22:31     ` [PATCH v7 5/6] baseband/acc100: modify validation code " Nicolas Chautru
2022-06-03 20:23       ` Vargas, Hernan
2022-05-31 22:31     ` [PATCH v7 6/6] baseband/acc100: configuration of ACC101 from PF Nicolas Chautru
2022-06-02  8:33       ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-06-06 14:54     ` [PATCH v7 0/6] drivers/baseband: PMD to support ACC100/ACC101 devices Chautru, Nicolas
2022-06-06 15:03       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-06-06 16:18         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-06-15 14:08     ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-06-22 11:50       ` Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1652734113-124047-3-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
    --to=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=hernan.vargas@intel.com \
    --cc=ray.kinsella@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).