Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.6 (LTS) patches review and test

[Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>]

On 30/12/2019 08:56, Lili Deng wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
> 
> 
> 
> I'd like to sign off validation dpdk-stable-18.11.6-rc1 against Azure gallery images.
> 
> Version used - https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/snapshot/dpdk-stable-18.11.6-rc1.tar.xz<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.dpdk.org%2Fdpdk-stable%2Fsnapshot%2Fdpdk-stable-18.11.6-rc1.tar.xz&data=02%7C01%7CLili.Deng%40microsoft.com%7C2f2d046d52444b0b36e408d78cf5cc47%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637132859661424426&sdata=q2ZOJFlR0fZgpfU5FnVp%2FoTeYu8qubAWD9Nolw4kuEo%3D&reserved=0>
> 
> 
> 
> Below are test matrix and results -
> 
> Tests
> 
> Ubuntu 16.04
> 
> Ubuntu 18.04
> 
> Ubuntu 19.10
> 
> RHEL 7-RAW
> 
> SLES 15
> 
> RHEL 7.5
> 
> CentOS 7.5
> 
> RHEL 8
> 
> CentOS 8
> 
> VERIFY-DPDK-FAILSAFE-DURING-TRAFFIC
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> VERIFY-DPDK-BUILD-AND-TESTPMD-TEST
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> VERIFY-SRIOV-FAILSAFE-FOR-DPDK
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> VERIFY-DPDK-COMPLIANCE
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> VERIFY-DPDK-OVS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> SKIPPED
> 
> SKIPPED
> 
> SKIPPED
> 
> SKIPPED
> 
> SKIPPED
> 
> SKIPPED
> 
> VERIFY-DPDK-RING-LATENCY
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PERF-DPDK-FWD-PPS-DS15
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PERF-DPDK-SINGLE-CORE-PPS-DS4
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PERF-DPDK-SINGLE-CORE-PPS-DS15
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PERF-DPDK-MULTICORE-PPS-DS15
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PERF-DPDK-MULTICORE-PPS-F32
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> FAIL
> 
> PASS
> 
> PASS
> 
> FAIL
> 
> PASS
> 
> FAIL
> 
> 
> 
> FAIL reason for PERF-DPDK-MULTICORE-PPS-F32 - the performance is not expected in some rate.
> 
> For example, when run 3 times, only 1/3 pass, maybe the size Standard_F32s_v2 on Azure is unstable.
> 
> 

Thanks Lili. I think this is ok. It seems this test has been reporting
fails in previous testing cycles too. Perhaps in future the thresholds
could be changed so it will check if there are regressions?

fyi - if you want to be added to the list of validation contacts for
dpdk stable
(https://git.dpdk.org/tools/stable-scripts/tree/validation-contacts),
let me know. Not a requirement, just to make it easier for being
notified about an RC's etc.

Kevin.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lili
> 


<snip>