From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] test: fix missing NULL pointer checks
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:18:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1692949.19G84kSIeU@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150127180640.GB20118@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
2015-01-27 13:06, Neil Horman:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 04:44:53PM +0100, Daniel Mrzyglod wrote:
> > In test_sched, we are missing NULL pointer checks after create_mempool()
> > and rte_pktmbuf_alloc(). Add in these checks using TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL macros.
> >
> > VERIFY macro was removed and replaced by standard test ASSERTS from "test.h" header.
> > This provides additional information to track when the failure occured.
> >
> > v3 changes:
> > - remove VERIFY macro
> > - fix spelling error.
> > - change unproper comment
> >
> > v2 changes:
> > - Replace all VERIFY macros instances by proper TEST_ASSERT* macros.
> > - fix description
> >
> > v1 changes:
> > - first iteration of patch using VERIFY macro.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzyglod <danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com>
>
> These TEST_ASSERT macros are no better than the VERIFY macro, they contain
> exaxtly the same return issue that I outlined in my first post on the subject.
Neil, you are suggesting to rework the assert macros of the unit tests.
It should be another patch.
Here, Daniel is improving the sched test with existing macros.
I think it should be applied.
--
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-30 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-27 15:44 Daniel Mrzyglod
2015-01-27 18:06 ` Neil Horman
2015-01-30 10:18 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2015-02-10 11:46 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-02-24 20:54 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1692949.19G84kSIeU@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).