From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D4DA04DD; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:40:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D824C96; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:40:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21982AB for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:40:01 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: MmdFxg94MzJzWm4E7CvJco4FWPJsWAfa50bdDmENTz79CRy8sd7rBG6pFzKsQ8mgWHryvpBVtm ScL+8UtwvxMg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9810"; a="158365870" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,353,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="158365870" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Nov 2020 09:39:59 -0800 IronPort-SDR: V1DeDWaEobRX6vWKEzEjDPAaKr+TlO6z9HU6A1c4hxJXmnqRA1RVuJ4clVWIRAIpTmgxFbQ6sH eZN3imc60X+A== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,353,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="360091943" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.252.20.82]) ([10.252.20.82]) by fmsmga004-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Nov 2020 09:39:57 -0800 To: Ajit Khaparde Cc: dpdk-dev , Thomas Monjalon , David Marchand References: <20201117051049.45891-1-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <16dc0dff-967a-1c9d-475a-a5851d692587@intel.com> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 17:39:54 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: update the OS versions X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 11/19/2020 5:36 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 9:12 AM Ferruh Yigit wrote: >> >> On 11/17/2020 5:10 AM, Ajit Khaparde wrote: >>> Update the OS versions. Remove some old OS versions. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde >>> --- >>> doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst | 8 +++----- >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst b/doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst >>> index d9a7d87930..898c71ef1e 100644 >>> --- a/doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst >>> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst >>> @@ -29,17 +29,16 @@ Operating Systems supported: >>> >>> * Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.1 (Ootpa) >>> * Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.0 (Ootpa) >>> +* Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.8 (Maipo) >>> * Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) >>> * Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.6 (Maipo) >>> * Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.5 (Maipo) >>> -* Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.4 (Maipo) >>> -* Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.3 (Maipo) >>> -* Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.2 (Maipo) >>> +* CentOS Linux release 8.1 >>> * CentOS Linux release 8.0 >>> +* CentOS Linux release 7.8 >>> * CentOS Linux release 7.7 >>> * CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 >>> * CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 >>> -* CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 >>> * Fedora 31 >>> * FreeBSD 12.1 >>> * Suse 15SP1 >>> @@ -47,7 +46,6 @@ Operating Systems supported: >>> * Ubuntu 18.04 >>> * Ubuntu 16.10 >>> * Ubuntu 16.04 >>> -* Ubuntu 14.04 >>> >> >> Should we keep the supported OS list per PMD? I think other-way around makes >> more sense, > + to document if a DPDK supported OS is not supporting this particular >> PMD. > +1 > Should we target it for 20.11 ? > We still have time to get doc updates for v20.11. >> >> If the intention is to document the tested platforms with this device, I think >> you are already documenting it in the release notes. > I agree. >