From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3] Remove validate-abi.sh from tree
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:18:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1711842.QZUTf85G27@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200422120702.GB864272@hmswarspite.think-freely.org>
22/04/2020 14:07, Neil Horman:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:43:44PM +0100, Ray Kinsella wrote:
> > On 21/04/2020 22:42, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 21/04/2020 20:56, Neil Horman:
> > >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 01:46:43PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >>> 21/04/2020 13:12, Neil Horman:
> > >>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 04:42:38PM +0100, Ray Kinsella wrote:
> > >>>>> On 17/04/2020 13:10, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >>>>>> 17/04/2020 13:47, Ray Kinsella:
> > >>>>>>> On 17/04/2020 11:20, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> 17/04/2020 12:11, Ray Kinsella:
> > >>>>>>>>> check-abi.sh appears to be backward step in terms of usability.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> No, check-abi.sh benefits from a nice integration in build scripts.
> > >>>>>>>> See below.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> With validate-abi.sh I do can do a "validate-abi.sh HEAD~1 HEAD".
> > >>>>>>>>> And it will do the build, install, dump and comparison for me.
> > >>>>>>>>> And it picked up my 20.0.2 - > 21.0 changes no problem.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> With check-abi on the other hand, I need to the build and install myself.
> > >>>>>>>>> check-abi requires dump files, but I see no reference in the documentation to how these are created.
> > >>>>>>>>> It silently fails when it doesn't find any ...
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Do I run abi-dumper on the so's myself, or how does it work?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> check-abi.sh is integrated in test-build.sh and test-meson-builds.sh.
> > >>>>>>>> Probably we should document usage in these scripts.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Looks like I need to set DPDK_ABI_REF_VERSION=master, not obvious.
> > >>>>>>> Any tips or tricks would be welcome.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> export DPDK_ABI_REF_VERSION=v20.02
> > >>>>>> or
> > >>>>>> export DPDK_ABI_REF_VERSION=v19.11
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Depends on which compatibility you want to test...
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Few things ...
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 1. test-meson-build.sh keep barfing complaining about reference paths.
> > >>>>> ValueError: dst_dir must be absolute, got reference/v19.11/build-gcc-static/usr/local/share/dpdk/examples/bbdev_app
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Under the hood, ninja install is failing complaining that it needs an absolute path.
> > >>>>> I fixed this in test_meson_build.sh and will send a patch in a minute.
> > >>>>> Though it's strange no-one else has seen it?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 2. test-meson-build.sh compares the abi for the static builds, which doesn't make any sense.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 3. test-meson-build.sh will only take a branch in DPDK_ABI_REF_VERSION that exists locally.
> > >>>>> In order to get it to compare HEAD against HEAD~1, which you would imagine is a pretty common case.
> > >>>>> I had a create a branch for HEAD~1, in validate-abi this a pretty simple `validate-abi HEAD~1 HEAD`
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> I think this code in test-meson-build.sh should probably be fixed:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> if [ ! -d $abirefdir/src ]; then
> > >>>> git clone --local --no-hardlinks \
> > >>>> --single-branch \
> > >>>> -b $DPDK_ABI_REF_VERSION \
> > >>>> $srcdir $abirefdir/src
> > >>>> fi
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Like you noted, using -b allows us to checkout a tag/branch in the cloned
> > >>>> repository but requires that it exist locally. We should probably prefix the
> > >>>> checkout with a git fetch --tags
> > >>>
> > >>> I don't understand your concern.
> > >>> A reference is an older version, so it should be in the git tree.
> > >>>
> > >> yes, but not unless you've done a recent pull or fetch. If you set
> > >> DPDK_ABI_REF_VERSION to a tag/branch that didn't exist as of the last time you
> > >> updated the tree, it won't be there (which it sounds like what is being
> > >> encountered here). You can fix that by doing a git pull or git fetch prior to
> > >> running this script (or internal to the script)
> > >
> > > Sorry I still don't understand the case.
> > > We want to compare the current version C with a reference R which is older.
> > > If the reference R is not in the tree, it means the version C is not in the tree.
> > > But C is the current version, so it is in the tree by definition.
> > >
> >
> > So I can just relate my experience ....
> >
> > root@silpixa00395806:/build/dpdk# DPDK_ABI_REF_VERSION=HEAD~1 ./devtools/test-meson-builds.sh
> > ninja -C ./build-gcc-static
> > ninja: Entering directory `./build-gcc-static'
> > [1766/2204] Compiling C object 'examples/c590b3c@@dpdk-vm_power_manager@exe/vm_power_manager_channel_monitor.c.o'.
> > ../examples/vm_power_manager/channel_monitor.c:22:9: note: #pragma message: Jansson dev libs unavailable, not including JSON parsing
> > #pragma message "Jansson dev libs unavailable, not including JSON parsing"
> > ^~~~~~~
> > [2204/2204] Linking target drivers/librte_pmd_softnic.so.20.0.2.
> > Cloning into 'reference/HEAD~1/src'...
> > warning: Could not find remote branch HEAD~1 to clone.
> > fatal: Remote branch HEAD~1 not found in upstream origin
> > fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
> >
> Ah, So its not the problem i was describing, I think the problem you are seeing
> is that the -b option only operates on branches and tags, not arbitrary git
> revisions.
>
> To fix that, what we probably need to do is alter test-build.sh and
> test-meson-build.sh such that the git clone operation is preceded by something
> like this:
> git tag ABI_CHECK_TAG $DPDK_ABI_REF_VERSION
>
> git clone ....
>
> git tag -d ABI_CHECK_TAG
>
> Doing so will guarantee that the source tree has a tag reference that the git
> clone operation can use to do a checkout with a -b option on.
I don't see the benefit of such test.
Can we just document that the reference must be an existing tag?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-22 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-16 14:54 Neil Horman
2020-04-17 10:11 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-04-17 10:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-17 10:35 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-04-17 11:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-17 11:47 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-04-17 12:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-17 15:42 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-04-17 16:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-20 8:43 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-04-21 11:12 ` Neil Horman
2020-04-21 11:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-21 18:56 ` Neil Horman
2020-04-21 21:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-22 11:43 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-04-22 12:07 ` Neil Horman
2020-04-22 12:18 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-04-22 13:19 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-04-22 13:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-23 11:03 ` Neil Horman
2020-04-22 12:01 ` Neil Horman
2020-04-22 12:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-23 10:57 ` Neil Horman
2020-05-24 20:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] devtools: remove old ABI validation script Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1711842.QZUTf85G27@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).