From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5093A0C41; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 10:08:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF844069C; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 10:08:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new3-smtp.messagingengine.com (new3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.229]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E504C40687 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 10:08:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403EA58070A; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 04:08:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 23 Jun 2021 04:08:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= LW+95yJuPBGIBlOJ6zWfN0l9wBcSi7cSmzH49n66mQI=; b=yzvMJNa3Tjp31Iof o3wBxutWVVqcA2f/+nnSqmGJi7+p/VTJez8VVZo1WZBQVIdHqrJ3XXg4hzJjlCDC yAw+xil3JjvbcoMBGpGkOF0SSoLnPncSIg32bUqducQg+y1RUpJjj3BbevspKGw/ V8B+6pSXtjRzNE2zfy5UMC3kl9e1+Nmb51/V5oQIOvUnemdtomGkJNNS03vzqNxV 3OZf36AwsJ4g0Ym/9KxW0A2zvjaQuzVfs3NdcVjzpqnma2KgwgwVT+9/Datql88Y yrlqC/m8MLtvAOCsbfZBLOqHms2tscQSWlQb1wl0rCOHQCHUKAOPRkuF4InY75wi kleY2A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=LW+95yJuPBGIBlOJ6zWfN0l9wBcSi7cSmzH49n66m QI=; b=PRUoNQ4unFhXROZW7U2x2p+/OBe1c/ATXrgSHJtGtshFJ7vscdULiTsi2 OUvYMsP95UsXeMAIKhDJzTTWXQaQyecdxCM1IdsC89B0eS29xZxridnud87bafvD JNDroKYjYTXiYEgc8hY34SHKoIN1XktHDHl6Hg1MPhJm+IJCxnMbp5kOOjT4z4Pu 6uLkfveG+qEMG0I0Jk+Mz4FF9mm8was/ZBP+jhYgxg8fD2SvKcqWAKm0Qdqnewts XqRl0hOcb5e2ntPqKb9XZ8IrGaSRCJvzbevxF7H6hOqqRiopcwTWHwqzw6GyhRRe GDJh9i2hTKz2lIIEO7R7BzqGLLJrA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrfeegfedgtdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 04:08:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: fengchengwen Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Honnappa Nagarahalli , "jerinj@marvell.com" , Ruifeng Wang , "juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech" , "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "viktorin@rehivetech.com" , "bruce.richardson@intel.com" , "jerinjacobk@gmail.com" , nd , andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, david.marchand@redhat.com Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 10:08:29 +0200 Message-ID: <17283472.kmRaX2h9hS@thomas> In-Reply-To: <616fa425-6bb9-54cc-2493-e1963afe0a27@huawei.com> References: <1620808126-18876-1-git-send-email-fengchengwen@huawei.com> <616fa425-6bb9-54cc-2493-e1963afe0a27@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] config/arm: select most suitable -march for kunpeng soc X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 21/06/2021 02:52, fengchengwen: > Hi, Thomas > > Another patch '[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/2] net/hns3: refactor SVE code compile method' > has nothing to do with this patch (they're just in the same patchset) and has been > reviewed by ARM guys. If they are unrelated, why are they in the same patchset? > So please review it, thanks.