From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E1DA0521; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 12:22:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 427BEC972; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 12:22:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92849C96A for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 12:22:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7E7580A26; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 06:22:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 03 Nov 2020 06:22:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= ElgxS4G44hRxGP6+FKyLxa0KFkqav1BlZxRMWmOLZ5M=; b=i2v8Fd/Cki5i1xBV DFgl+RxOtqWHMBiOX0rbjPPHGVgJHtLbGDMINdp+iU475zQSBGa8AxP7h1Xk0h0z 8fRSmGifXtaeYZ+avM6zkNGN5ZJj796KkbYDFvgjCcV4cjvQqq4ZgtDk17i2noG+ CWKNPIcuCfOXMi3jrES2tPTuePNpSzpDKXoJITAFWR+k5vtVcW5bwFfhuJrTzuUI UUlElTPGaRaHnqVBW5F74V7B6z4YAXMsALX09URjEmOD51FDEcrV2J6zY3+acNHd Qf7bni8qQW9UIuR9V5gzVhCfzJzbl2VZ9KqNd5glHpMqzQNgCWudeXVw0ZCqw39S iSwREg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=ElgxS4G44hRxGP6+FKyLxa0KFkqav1BlZxRMWmOLZ 5M=; b=mevZMR+lmqc7xovHxdKEzS8na8G34goyv8NfCXEgpfLUquLdc2pOA3pBX wukgun7sOwyMrigOWwsKkJIzxdKky5uEf5yQjhVauxvz3qgbAKLYLkY8Z3KWbFhU 3sJts++nT7tD1+C4GjhwO164EA6PuEtypcAdmgldIk1aDqXStHuvJAo514R7wzLJ /0QJintpG88/4gWouuhfnaSMuokiU8YufPaWefNqwM/UzAMcObiRitx6gO4HUxxD 3SqIYq2VD3+hf+3xWGMj1nrfCnN3e0C0oIMiZ7g45TBbaNogAYAnPlYt4yhnBAnX hQZUQP1PT80JuCiEJgeYVALWS/f5g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedruddtfedgvdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CA62B3280064; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 06:22:43 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Harman Kalra Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com, andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, jerinj@marvell.com, viacheslavo@nvidia.com, Nithin Dabilpuram , Kiran Kumar K Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 12:22:42 +0100 Message-ID: <1730016.d2bl2iErz5@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20201103105235.GA65452@outlook.office365.com> References: <20201029092751.3837177-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20201103001407.2931963-10-thomas@monjalon.net> <20201103105235.GA65452@outlook.office365.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 09/16] net/octeontx2: switch Rx timestamp to dynamic mbuf field X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 03/11/2020 11:52, Harman Kalra: > With the following changes, ptpclient and testpmd(ieee1588 mode) is > crashing for us. I am debugging the issue and will update soon. > ------------------ > Steps to reproduce: > 1. Testpmd: > ./dpdk-testpmd -c 0xffff01 -n 4 -w 0002:05:00.0 -- -i > --port-topology=loop > testpmd> set fwd ieee1588 > testpmd> set port 0 ptype_mask 0xf > testpmd> start > > I am sending ptp packets using scapy from the peer: > >>> p = Ether(src='98:03:9b:67:b0:d0', dst='FA:62:0C:27:AD:BC', > >>> type=35063)/Raw(load='\x00\x02') > >>> sendp (p, iface="p5p2") > > I am observing seg fault even for 1 packet. Where is the crash? Could you provide a backtrace? Is the field well registered?