DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, doug.foster@arm.com,
	david.marchand@redhat.com,
	Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] rcu: shift 64-bit constant to avoid implicit 32 to 64 bit conversion
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 07:25:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1731684330-5735-1-git-send-email-andremue@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1731448959-18046-1-git-send-email-andremue@linux.microsoft.com>

../lib/rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.c(101): warning C4334: '<<': result of 32-bit
 shift implicitly converted to 64 bits (was 64-bit shift intended?)
../lib/rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.c(107): warning C4334: '<<': result of 32-bit
 shift implicitly converted to 64 bits (was 64-bit shift intended?)
../lib/rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.c(145): warning C4334: '<<': result of 32-bit
 shift implicitly converted to 64 bits (was 64-bit shift intended?)

These warnings are being issued by the MSVC compiler. Since the result is
being stored in a variable of type uint64_t, it makes sense to shift a
64-bit number instead of shifting a 32-bit number and then having the
compiler to convert the result implicitly to 64 bits.
UINT64_C was used in the fix as it is the portable way to define a 64-bit
constant (ULL suffix is architecture dependent).

From reading the code this is also a bugfix:
(1 << id), where id = thread_id & 0x3f, was wrong when thread_id > 0x1f.

Fixes: 64994b56cfd7 ("rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism")

Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
---
 lib/rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.c b/lib/rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.c
index 40d7c566c8..dbf31501a6 100644
--- a/lib/rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.c
+++ b/lib/rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.c
@@ -99,12 +99,12 @@ rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_register(struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v, unsigned int thread_id)
 
 	/* Add the thread to the bitmap of registered threads */
 	old_bmap = rte_atomic_fetch_or_explicit(__RTE_QSBR_THRID_ARRAY_ELM(v, i),
-						(1UL << id), rte_memory_order_release);
+						RTE_BIT64(id), rte_memory_order_release);
 
 	/* Increment the number of threads registered only if the thread was not already
 	 * registered
 	 */
-	if (!(old_bmap & (1UL << id)))
+	if (!(old_bmap & RTE_BIT64(id)))
 		rte_atomic_fetch_add_explicit(&v->num_threads, 1, rte_memory_order_relaxed);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -137,12 +137,12 @@ rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_unregister(struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v, unsigned int thread_id)
 	 * reporting threads.
 	 */
 	old_bmap = rte_atomic_fetch_and_explicit(__RTE_QSBR_THRID_ARRAY_ELM(v, i),
-						 ~(1UL << id), rte_memory_order_release);
+						 ~RTE_BIT64(id), rte_memory_order_release);
 
 	/* Decrement the number of threads unregistered only if the thread was not already
 	 * unregistered
 	 */
-	if (old_bmap & (1UL << id))
+	if (old_bmap & RTE_BIT64(id))
 		rte_atomic_fetch_sub_explicit(&v->num_threads, 1, rte_memory_order_relaxed);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ rte_rcu_qsbr_dump(FILE *f, struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v)
 			t = rte_ctz64(bmap);
 			fprintf(f, "%u ", id + t);
 
-			bmap &= ~(1UL << t);
+			bmap &= ~RTE_BIT64(t);
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ rte_rcu_qsbr_dump(FILE *f, struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v)
 				rte_atomic_load_explicit(
 					&v->qsbr_cnt[id + t].lock_cnt,
 					rte_memory_order_relaxed));
-			bmap &= ~(1UL << t);
+			bmap &= ~RTE_BIT64(t);
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-15 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-12 22:02 [PATCH] " Andre Muezerie
2024-11-13  3:12 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2024-11-13  3:31 ` Morten Brørup
2024-11-13 16:23 ` [PATCH v2] " Andre Muezerie
2024-11-15 14:21   ` David Marchand
2024-11-15 14:45     ` Andre Muezerie
2024-11-15 15:25 ` Andre Muezerie [this message]
2024-11-15 16:18   ` [PATCH v3] " Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1731684330-5735-1-git-send-email-andremue@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=andremue@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=doug.foster@arm.com \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).